SHOWING THE RIGHT WAY CALLED ISLAM
(Latest 20 entries) (Calendar) (Friends) (User info) Navigate: (Previous 20 entries)
Sunday, December 31, 2006

January 28, 2006
Western women are turning to Islam in rapidly increasing numbers. KAY JARDINE discovers why they are so keen to become Muslims.
Bullying, depression, and insomnia made Kimberley McCrindle’s teenage years particularly difficult. Taunts
from classmates about her weight and how she looked left the
19-year-old student feeling like she didn’t really fit in, and always
searching for something that would make her feel happy, that would make
her feel she belonged.
McCrindle, from a family of atheists, did not encounter religion
until she began religious studies at high school in Penicuik, when her
new interest prompted her to start going to her local church on
Sundays. But the peace and happiness McCrindle was looking for eluded
her until she started college in Edinburgh, where she made friends with
some Muslim people and discovered Islam.
“I was looking for peace,” she says. “I’d had a rough past. My
teenage years weren’t great: I was bullied at school, people called me
fat and ugly, and I was looking for something to make me happy. I tried
to go to church once a week but I wouldn’t class myself a Christian; I
was just interested. But it wasn’t for me, I didn’t feel in place there.
“When you walk into a mosque you feel really peaceful. Praying five
times a day is really focused. It gives you a purpose in your life. The
Koran is like a guide to help you: when you read it, it makes you feel
better.”
McCrindle became a Muslim three years ago and is now known by her
married Arabic name, Tasnim Salih. She is one of a rapidly increasing
number of British women turning to Islam, thought to be the fastest
growing religion in the world. Although there are no official figures
on the subject, there is no doubt that the number of converts is on the
rise and the majority are women, according to Nicole Bourque, a senior
lecturer in social anthropology at Glasgow University and an expert in
conversion to Islam in Britain.
“There are people converting all the time,” she says. “I would
estimate that there are probably around 200 converts to Islam in
Glasgow alone, but that’s just a rough estimate. The data is difficult
to acquire.” Other estimates put the Glasgow figure closer to 500.
Mohammad Faroghul-Quadri, imam at the Khazra mosque in Glasgow, says
that whichever religion people choose to reach God, whether it’s
Christianity or Islam or something else, the important thing is that
they are getting peace of mind and heart, and proper guidance from God.
The appeal of Islam to liberated western women is difficult for many
to understand, largely because of the widespread perception in the west
that it treats women badly. A forthcoming documentary, Mum I’m a
Muslim, addresses this very issue by talking to converts in Sheffield
about their experiences.
At a preview in Glasgow, I asked a group of converts from Glasgow
and Edinburgh what motivated them to change every aspect of their
lives, including their names, to become Muslim.
For 27-year-old Bahiya Malik, or Lucy Norris to her parents, it’s
difficult to xplain. Bahiya, who lives in Edinburgh, her twin sister,
Victoria, and their brother, atthew, grew up as practising Christians
in a rural area in the West Midlands, where they attended Sunday school
in the little church at the top of their road. As they got older, the
three stopped going to church and seven years ago, at the age of 20,
both Bahiya and her sister converted to Islam - six months after their
brother.
“Maybe all through our teenage years we hadn’t been that happy. I
can’t really say what it was. I don’t know if we felt there was
something missing or that we didn’t fit in. We were a little bit shy
and we weren’t really outgoing sort of people,” she says. At the time,
Bahiya was two years into a media and television course in Edinburgh
but was feeling uninspired.
After around six months of learning about Islam, Bahiya realised
that living her life according to the rules of Islam was what would
make her happy and, during an emotional visit to a mosque in London,
made her declaration of faith.
“I think it’s something you feel in your heart, this pull,” she
says. “You can’t really put it into words. It’s like your heart
speaking, something you feel inside and you know it’s for you. Allah
has chosen this for you, it’s out of your power.”
Women who turn to Islam are aware of the widespread western
perception that they are oppressed and discriminated against, but
insist that the depiction is a false image. For many it is a spiritual
journey, which, far from repressing them, improves their social status
and gives them new rights.
“You seem to be really looked after,” says Tasnim. “As a Muslim
woman, Muslim men really respect you; they do everything for you.
You’re highly thought of and protected.” Bahiya says: “I feel that
because you cover yourself up you’re not seen as a sex symbol, and
because people can’t judge you on your appearance, they have to judge
you as a human being. That’s quite liberating.”
As an act of modesty, many Muslim women don’t wear make up outside
the home and it is often a part of their old life that new female
converts are happy to discard because of the liberating feeling that
comes from knowing their appearance doesn’t matter. They resist being
shown as they were before their conversion.
Hafsa Hashmi, who lives in Glasgow, converted to Islam 24 years ago
and felt > life outside Islam was like having to “keep up with the
Joneses”. Under Islam, however, she says: “Your aim is not for this
life, your aim is for the afterlife. To some people that sounds pretty
horrific: they can’t think about death, but in Islam belief in the
afterlife is one of its main features, because you know if you’re doing
the right thing you’ve got a better life to come. So why go for all the
material things?”
Converting to Islam usually means a complete change of lifestyle for
those who take the plunge, including a different diet, often a new
Arabic name, and your time revolving around the five daily Islamic
prayers. In the workplace, some people organise with their employer a
room where they can have some peace and quiet to pray. Wherever they
are in the world, all Muslims face in the direction of the Kab’aa, or
the Holy House in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, during prayer.
For female converts, the experience can also involve a quite
dramatic change in appearance. Muslim law provides that women must
dress modestly. The hijab, or the head scarf, is a particular focal
point and can be a tricky area for new Muslim women to deal with. Dr
Bourque suggests this is because it is such a visible symbol of the
faith.
Tasnim wore the hijab straight away, although she found wearing it
in public scary at first because she felt people were looking at her.
She was then forced to take it off when she was out because of some of
the comments directed at her.
“People would shout, ‘Go back home to your own country’. I had
someone spit at me once when I was standing at the bus stop at
college.” Now, though, she wears it all the time and says: “People
don’t say anything to me now and I feel more confident about wearing
it.” Bahiya was happy wearing the hijab from the beginning, but her
parents found it quite difficult.
She says her sister, her brother, and herself were lucky because
their parents were “quite good” about their conversion. For others,
however, families are not always so accepting, often because they know
little about the religion and why their loved ones want to follow it.
For Tasnim, telling her parents, who are atheist, was
nerve-wracking. “They thought I was going through a phase at first but
they realised when I started wearing the hijab that I was serious. They
started getting angry when I began to talk about getting married. They
weren’t too pleased that I’d met someone older than me, who was Muslim
as well, and a different nationality.”
While Tasnim and her mother are still close and enjoy a good
relationship, they tend not to talk about her faith much. She and her
father no longer speak. For Hafsa, telling her parents 24 years ago was
perhaps even more difficult because converting to Islam then was
anything but a common occurrence.
The reactions of her parents were totally opposite. “I think my
mother felt that I was only becoming a Muslim because of who I was
marrying, but that wasn’t the case because I had been introduced to
Islam about four years previously although I didn’t convert until I got
married. It took her practically her whole life to get over it. When we
got married, my mum said, ‘If you’re happy, I’m happy’, but obviously
she wasn’t. My dad said it and he meant it, that was the difference
between them.”
Tasnim has been married to Sabir, who is Sudanese, for two years,
and says she has never been happier. “I met my husband at college and
it seemed like the right thing to do. I was teaching him English and he
was talking to me about Islam, and we just fell in love,” she says.
Bahiya’s husband, Sharafuddin, is also is also a convert, formerly
known as Cameron. They have two children, aged two and four.
For Tasnim, Bahiya, and Hafsa, life revolves around the five daily
prayers, they cannot eat certain foods, or drink alcohol. But the women
say they miss nothing from the days before they converted to Islam.
“Islam is enough for me,” says Bahiya. “You don’t need anything else
once you’ve found it.”
Becoming Muslim has provided Tasnim with the happiness and belonging
she was looking for. “It’s a complete change in your attitude,
behaviour, and the way you think,” she says. “I’m now more confident,
happy and satisfied. I’ve achieved the fulfilment I was looking for.”
Source: The Herald
TESTIMONIES OF JEWISH CONVERTS TO ISLAM
These are True Stories
of Jewish People who followed Judaism and became Muslim, despite the Israeli Arab
political conflict, more and more Jews are realizing
that Judaism and
Christianity are light houses leading to Islam, whether you were a Messianic Jew, a Jew
for Jesus, or an Orthodox Jew, any Jew can be for Allah. Because Everyone
is born a Muslim (in Submission to Allah) Everyday Jews are Returning
(Reverting) to their Religion of Birth and the Religion of Abraham, Moses, and
all the past Prophets, Islam.
Interview with Maryam Jameelah
Q: Would you kindly tell us how your interest in Islam
began?
A: I was Margaret (Peggy) Marcus. As a small child I
possessed a keen interest in music and was particularly fond of the classical operas and
symphonies considered high culture in the West. Music was my favorite subject in school in
which I always earned the highest grades. By sheer chance, I happened to hear Arabic music
over the radio which so much pleased me that I was determined to hear more. I would not
leave my parents in peace until my father finally took me to the Syrian section in New
York City where I bought a stack of Arabic recordings. My parents, relatives and neighbors
thought Arabic and its music dreadfully weird and so distressing to their ears that
whenever I put on my recordings, they demanded that I close all the doors and windows in
my room lest they be disturbed! After I embraced Islam in 1961, I used to sit enthralled
by the hour at the mosque in New York, listening to tape-recordings of Tilawat chanted by
the celebrated Egyptian Qari, Abdul Basit. But on Jumha Salat (Friday Prayers), the Imam
did not play the tapes. We had a special guest that day. A short, very thin and
poorly-dressed black youth, who introduced himself to us as a student from Zanzibar,
recited Surah ar-Rahman. I never heard such glorious Tilawat even from Abdul Basit! He
possessed such a voice of gold; surely Hazrat Bilal must have sounded much like him!
I traced the beginning of my interest in Islam to the age
of ten. While attending a reformed Jewish Sunday school, I became fascinated with the
historical relationship between the Jews and the Arabs. From my Jewish textbooks, I
learned that Abraham was the father of the Arabs as well as the Jews. I read how centuries
later when, in medieval Europe, Christian persecution made their lives intolerable, the
Jews were welcomed in Muslim Spain and that it was the magnanimity of this same Arabic
Islamic civilization which stimulated Hebrew culture to reach its highest peak of
achievement.
Totally unaware of the true nature of Zionism, I naively
thought that the Jews were returning to Palestine to strengthen their close ties of
kinship in religion and culture with their Semitic cousins. Together I believed that the
Jews and the Arabs would cooperate to attain another Golden Age of culture in the Middle
East.
Despite my fascination with the study of Jewish history, I
was extremely unhappy at the Sunday school. At this time I identified myself strongly with
the Jewish people in Europe, then suffering a horrible fate under the Nazis and I was
shocked that none of my fellow classmates nor their parents took their religion seriously.
During the services at the synagogue, the children used to read comic strips hidden in
their prayer books and laugh to scorn at the rituals. The children were so noisy and
disorderly that the teachers could not discipline them and found it very difficult to
conduct the classes.
At home the atmosphere for religious observance was
scarcely more congenial. My elder sister detested the Sunday school so much that my mother
literally had to drag her out of bed in the mornings and it never went without the
struggle of tears and hot words. Finally my parents were exhausted and let her quit. On
the Jewish High Holy Days instead of attending synagogue and fasting on Yom Kippur, my
sister and I were taken out of school to attend family picnics and parties in fine
restaurants. When my sister and I convinced our parents how miserable we both were at the
Sunday school they joined an agnostic, humanist organization known as the Ethical Culture
Movement.
The Ethical Culture Movement was founded late in the 19th
century by Felix Alder. While studying for rabbinate, Felix Alder grew convinced that
devotion to ethical values as relative and man-made, regarding any supernaturalism or
theology as irrelevant, constituted the only religion fit for the modern world. I attended
the Ethical Culture Sunday School each week from the age of eleven until I graduated at
fifteen. Here I grew into complete accord with the ideas of the movement and regarded all
traditional, organized religions with scorn.
When I was eighteen years old I became a member of the
local Zionist youth movement known as the Mizrachi Hatzair. But when I found out what the
nature of Zionism was, which made the hostility between Jews and Arabs irreconcilable, I
left several months later in disgust. When I was twenty and a student at New York
University, one of my elective courses was entitled Judaism in Islam. My professor, Rabbi
Abraham Isaac Katsh, the head of the department of Hebrew Studies there, spared no efforts
to convince his students--all Jews, many of whom aspired to become rabbis--that Islam was
derived from Judaism. Our textbook, written by him, took each verse from the Quran,
painstakingly tracing it to its allegedly Jewish source. Although his real aim was to
prove to his students the superiority of Judaism over Islam, he convinced me diametrically
of the opposite.
I soon discovered that Zionism was merely a combination of
the racist, tribalistic aspects of Judaism. Modern secular nationalistic Zionism was
further discredited in my eyes when I learned that few, if any, of the leaders of Zionism
were observant Jews and that perhaps nowhere is Orthodox, traditional Judaism regarded
with such intense contempt as in Israel. When I found nearly all important Jewish leaders
in America supporters for Zionism, who felt not the slightest twinge of conscience because
of the terrible injustice inflicted upon the Palestinian Arabs, I could no longer consider
myself a Jew at heart.
One morning in November 1954, Professor Katsh, during his
lecture, argued with irrefutable logic that the monotheism taught by Moses (peace be upon
him) and the Divine Laws reveled to him were indispensable as the basis for all higher
ethical values. If morals were purely man-made, as the Ethical Culture and other agnostic
and atheistic philosophies taught, then they could be changed at will, according to mere
whim, convenience or circumstance. The result would be utter chaos leading to individual
and collective ruin. Belief in the Hereafter, as the Rabbis in the Talmud taught, argued
Professor Katsh, was not mere wishful thinking but a moral necessity. Only those, he said,
who firmly believed that each of us will be summoned by God on Judgement Day to render a
complete account of our life on earth and rewarded or punished accordingly, will possess
the self-discipline to sacrifice transitory pleasure and endure hardships and sacrifice to
attain lasting good.
It was in Professor Katsh's class that I met Zenita, the
most unusual and fascinating girl I have ever met. The first time I entered Professor
Katsh's class, as I looked around the room for an empty desk in which to sit, I spied two
empty seats, on the arm of one, three big beautifully bound volumes of Yusuf Ali's English
translation and commentary of the Holy Quran. I sat down right there, burning with
curiosity to find out to whom these volumes belonged. Just before Rabbi Katsh's lecture
was to begin, a tall, very slim girl with pale complexion framed by thick auburn hair, sat
next to me. Her appearance was so distinctive, I thought she must be a foreign student
from Turkey, Syria or some other Near Eastern country. Most of the other students were
young men wearing the black cap of Orthodox Jewry, who wanted to become rabbis. We two
were the only girls in the class. As we were leaving the library late that afternoon, she
introduced herself to me. Born into an Orthodox Jewish family, her parents had migrated to
America from Russia only a few years prior to the October Revolution in 1917 to escape
persecution. I noted that my new friend spoke English with the precise care of a
foreigner. She confirmed these speculations, telling me that since her family and their
friends speak only Yiddish among themselves, she did not learn any English until after
attending public school. She told me that her name was Zenita Liebermann but recently, in
an attempt to Americanize themselves, her parents had changed their name from
"Liebermann" to "Lane." Besides being thoroughly instructed in Hebrew
by her father while growing up and also in school, she said she was now spending all her
spare time studying Arabic. However, with no previous warning, Zenita dropped out of class
and although I continued to attend all of his lectures to the conclusion of the course,
Zenita never returned. Months passed and I had almost forgotten about Zenita when suddenly
she called and begged me to meet her at the Metropolitan Museum and go with her to look at
the special exhibition of exquisite Arabic calligraphy and ancient illuminated manuscripts
of the Quran. During our tour of the museum, Zenita told me how she had embraced Islam
with two of her Palestinian friends as witnesses.
I inquired, "Why did you decide to become a
Muslim?" She then told me that she had left Professor Katsh's class when she fell ill
with a severe kidney infection. Her condition was so critical, she told me, her mother and
father had not expected her to survive. "One afternoon while burning with fever, I
reached for my Holy Quran on the table beside by bed and began to read and while I recited
the verses, it touched me so deeply that I began to weep and then I knew I would recover.
As soon as I was strong enough to leave my bed, I summoned two of my Muslim friends and
took the oath of the "Shahadah" or Confession of Faith."
Zenita and I would eat our meals in Syrian restaurants
where I acquired a keen taste for this tasty cooking. When we had money to spend, we would
order Couscous, roast lamb with rice or a whole soup plate of delicious little meatballs
swimming in gravy scooped up with loaves of unleavened Arabic bread. And when we had
little to spend, we would eat lentils and rice, Arabic style, or the Egyptian national
dish of black broad beans with plenty of garlic and onions called "Ful".
While Professor Katsh was lecturing thus, I was comparing
in my mind what I had read in the Old Testament and the Talmud with what was taught in the
Quran and Hadith and finding Judaism so defective, I was converted to Islam.
Q: Were you scared that you might not be accepted by the
Muslims?
A: My increasing sympathy for Islam and Islamic ideals
enraged the other Jews I knew, who regarded me as having betrayed them in the worst
possible way. They used to tell me that such a reputation could only result from shame of
my ancestral heritage and an intense hatred for my people. They warned me that even if I
tried to become a Muslim, I would never be accepted. These fears proved totally unfounded
as I have never been stigmatized by any Muslim because of my Jewish origin. As soon as I
became a Muslim myself, I was welcomed most enthusiastically by all the Muslims as one of
them.
I did not embrace Islam out of hatred for my ancestral
heritage or my people. It was not a desire so much to reject as to fulfill. To me, it
meant a transition from parochial to a dynamic and revolutionary faith.
Q: Did your family object to your studying Islam?
A: Although I wanted to become a Muslim as far back as
1954, my family managed to argue me out of it. I was warned that Islam would complicate my
life because it is not, like Judaism and Christianity, part of the American scene. I was
told that Islam would alienate me from my family and isolate me from the community. At
that time my faith was not sufficiently strong to withstand these pressures. Partly as the
result of this inner turmoil, I became so ill that I had to discontinue college long
before it was time for me to graduate. For the next two years I remained at home under
private medical care, steadily growing worse. In desperation from 1957 - 1959 my parents
confined me both to private and public hospitals where I vowed that if ever I recovered
sufficiently to be discharged, I would embrace Islam.
After I was allowed to return home, I investigated all the
opportunities for meeting Muslims in New York City. It was my good fortune to meet some of
the finest men and women anyone could ever hope to meet. I also began to write articles
for Muslim magazines.
Q: What was the attitude of your parents and friends after
you became Muslim?
A: When I embraced Islam, my parents, relatives and
their friends regarded me almost as a fanatic, because I could think and talk of nothing
else. To them, religion is a purely private concern which at the most perhaps could be
cultivated like an amateur hobby among other hobbies. But as soon as I read the Holy
Quran, I knew that Islam was no hobby but life itself!
Q: In what ways did the Holy Quran have an impact on your
life?
A: One evening I was feeling particularly exhausted and
sleepless, Mother came into my room and said she was about to go to the Larchmont Public
Library and asked me if there was any book that I wanted? I asked her to look and see if
the library had a copy of an English translation of the Holy Quran. Just think, years of
passionate interest in the Arabs and reading every book in the library about them I could
lay my hands on but until now, I never thought to see what was in the Holy Quran! Mother
returned with a copy for me. I was so eager, I literally grabbed it from her hands and
read it the whole night. There I also found all the familiar Bible stories of my
childhood.
In my eight years of primary school, four years of
secondary school and one year of college, I learned about English grammar and composition,
French, Spanish, Latin and Greek in current use, Arithmetic, Geometry, Algebra, European
and American history, elementary science, Biology, music and art--but I had never learned
anything about God! Can you imagine I was so ignorant of God that I wrote to my
pen-friend, a Pakistani lawyer, and confessed to him the reason why I was an atheist was
because I couldn't believe that God was really an old man with a long white beard who sat
up on His throne in Heaven. When he asked me where I had learned this outrageous thing, I
told him of the reproductions from the Sistine Chapel I had seen in "Life"
Magazine of Michelangelo's "Creation" and "Original Sin." I described
all the representations of God as an old man with a long white beard and the numerous
crucifixions of Christ I had seen with Paula at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. But in the
Holy Quran, I read:
"Allah! There is no god but He,-the Living, The
Self-subsisting, Supporter of all. No slumber can seize Him nor sleep. His are all things
in the heavens and on earth. Who is thee can intercede in His presence except as He
permiteth? He knoweth what (appeareth to His creatures as) before or after or behind them.
Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His Throne doth extend
over the heavens and the earth, and He feeleth no fatigue in guarding and preserving them
for He is the Most High, the Supreme (in glory)." (Quran S.2:255)
"But the Unbelievers,-their deeds are like a mirage
in sandy deserts, which the man parched with thirst mistakes for water; until when he
comes up to it, he finds Allah there, and Allah will pay him his account: and Allah is
swift in taking account. Or (the unbelievers' state) is like the depths of darkness in a
vast deep ocean, overwhelmed with billow topped by billow, topped by (dark) clouds: depth
of darkness, one above another: if a man stretches out his hand, he can hardly see it! for
any to whom Allah giveth not light, there is no light!" (Quran S.24: 39-40)
My first thought when reading the Holy Quran - this is the
only true religion - absolutely sincere, honest, not allowing cheap compromises or
hypocrisy.
In 1959, I spent much of my leisure time reading books
about Islam in the New York Public Library. It was there I discovered four bulky volumes
of an English translation of Mishkat ul- Masabih. It was then that I learned that a proper
and detailed understanding of the Holy Quran is not possible without some knowledge of the
relevant Hadith. For how can the holy text correctly be interpreted except by the Prophet
to whom it was revealed?
Once I had studied the Mishkat, I began to accept the Holy
Quran as Divine revelation. What persuaded me that the Quran must be from God and not
composed by Muhammad (PBUH) was its satisfying and convincing answers to all the most
important questions of life which I could not find elsewhere.
As a child, I was so mortally afraid of death, particularly
the thought of my own death, that after nightmares about it, sometimes I would awaken my
parents crying in the middle of the night. When I asked them why I had to die and what
would happen to me after death, all they could say was that I had to accept the
inevitable; but that was a long way off and because medical science was constantly
advancing, perhaps I would live to be a hundred years old! My parents, family, and all our
friends rejected as superstition any thought of the Hereafter, regarding Judgment Day,
reward in Paradise or punishment in Hell as outmoded concepts of by-gone ages. In vain I
searched all the chapters of the Old Testament for any clear and unambiguous concept of
the Hereafter. The prophets, patriarchs and sages of the Bible all receive their rewards
or punishments in this world. Typical is the story of Job (Hazrat Ayub). God destroyed all
his loved-ones, his possessions, and afflicted him with a loathsome disease in order to
test his faith. Job plaintively laments to God why He should make a righteous man suffer.
At the end of the story, God restores all his earthly losses but nothing is even mentioned
about any possible consequences in the Hereafter.
Although I did find the Hereafter mentioned in the New
Testament, compared with that of the Holy Quran, it is vague and ambiguous. I found no
answer to the question of death in Orthodox Judaism, for the Talmud preaches that even the
worst life is better than death. My parents' philosophy was that one must avoid
contemplating the thought of death and just enjoy as best one can, the pleasures life has
to offer at the moment. According to them, the purpose of life is enjoyment and pleasure
achieved through self-expression of one's talents, the love of family, the congenial
company of friends combined with the comfortable living and indulgence in the variety of
amusements that affluent America makes available in such abundance. They deliberately
cultivated this superficial approach to life as if it were the guarantee for their
continued happiness and good-fortune. Through bitter experience I discovered that
self-indulgence leads only to misery and that nothing great or even worthwhile is ever
accomplished without struggle through adversity and self-sacrifice. From my earliest
childhood, I have always wanted to accomplish important and significant things. Above all
else, before my death I wanted the assurance that I have not wasted life in sinful deeds
or worthless pursuits. All my life I have been intensely serious-minded. I have always
detested the frivolity which is the dominant characteristic of contemporary culture. My
father once disturbed me with his unsettling conviction that there is nothing of permanent
value and because everything in this modern age accept the present trends inevitable and
adjust ourselves to them. I, however, was thirsty to attain something that would endure
forever. It was from the Holy Quran where I learned that this aspiration was possible. No
good deed for the sake of seeking the pleasure of God is ever wasted or lost. Even if the
person concerned never achieves any worldly recognition, his reward is certain in the
Hereafter. Conversely, the Quran tells us that those who are guided by no moral
considerations other than expediency or social conformity and crave the freedom to do as
they please, no matter how much worldly success and prosperity they attain or how keenly
they are able to relish the short span of their earthly life, will be doomed as the losers
on Judgement Day. Islam teaches us that in order to devote our exclusive attention to
fulfilling our duties to God and to our fellow-beings, we must abandon all vain and
useless activities which distract us from this end. These teachings of the Holy Quran,
made even more explicit by Hadith, were thoroughly compatible with my temperament.
Q: What is your opinion of the Arabs after you became a
Muslim?
A: As the years passed, the realization gradually
dawned upon me that it was not the Arabs who made Islam great but rather Islam had made
the Arabs great. Were it not for the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), the Arabs would be an
obscure people today. And were it not for the Holy Quran, the Arabic language would be
equally insignificant, if not extinct.
Q: Did you see any similarities between Judaism and
Islam?
A: The kinship between Judaism and Islam is even
stronger than Islam and Christianity. Both Judaism and Islam share in common the same
uncompromising monotheism, the crucial importance of strict obedience to Divine Law as
proof of our submission to and love of the Creator, the rejection of the priesthood,
celibacy and monasticism and the striking similarity of the Hebrew and Arabic language.
In Judaism, religion is so confused with nationalism, one
can scarcely distinguish between the two. The name "Judaism" is derived from
Judah-a tribe. A Jew is a member of the tribe of Judah. Even the name of this religion
connotes no universal spiritual message. A Jew is not a Jew by virtue of his belief in the
unity of God, but merely because he happened to be born of Jewish parentage. Should he
become an outspoken atheist, he is no less "Jewish" in the eyes of his fellow
Jews.
Such a thorough corruption with nationalism has spiritually
impoverished this religion in all its aspects. God is not the God of all mankind but the
God of Israel. The scriptures are not God's revelation to the entire human race but
primarily a Jewish history book. David and Solomon (peace be upon them) are not
full-fledged prophets of God but merely Jewish kings. With the single exception of Yom
Kippur (the Jewish Day of Atonement), the holidays and festivals celebrated by Jews, such
as Hanukkah, Purim and Pesach, are of far greater national than religious significance.
Q: Have you ever had the opportunity to talk about Islam to
the other Jews?
A: There is one particular incident which really stands
out in my mind when I had the opportunity to discuss Islam with a Jewish gentleman. Dr.
Shoreibah, of the Islamic Center in New York, introduced me to a very special guest. After
one Jumha Salat, I went into his office to ask him some questions about Islam but before I
could even greet him with "Assalamu Alaikum", I was completely astonished and
surprised to see seated before him an ultra-orthodox Chassidic Jew, complete with
earlocks, broad-brimmed black hat, long black silken caftan and a full flowing beard.
Under his arm was a copy of the Yiddish newspaper, "The Daily Forward". He told
us that his name was Samuel Kostelwitz and that he worked in New York City as a diamond
cutter. Most of his family, he said, lived in the Chassidic community of Williamsburg in
Brooklyn, but he also had many relatives and friends in Israel. Born in a small Rumanian
town, he had fled from the Nazi terror with his parents to America just prior to the
outbreak of the second world-war. I asked him what had brought him to the mosque? He told
us that he had been stricken with intolerable grief ever since his mother died 5 years
ago. He had tried to find solace and consolation for his grief in the synagogue but could
not when he discovered that many of the Jews, even in the ultra-orthodox community of
Williamsburg, were shameless hypocrites. His recent trip to Israel had left him more
bitterly disillusioned than ever. He was shocked by the irreligiousness he found in Israel
and he told us that nearly all the young sabras or native-born Israelis are militant
atheists. When he saw large herds of swine on one of the kibbutzim (collective farms) he
visited, he could only exclaim in horror: "Pigs in a Jewish state! I never thought
that was possible until I came here! Then when I witnessed the brutal treatment meted out
to innocent Arabs in Israel, I know then that there is no difference between the Israelis
and the Nazis. Never, never in the name of God, could I justify such terrible
crimes!" Then he turned to Dr. Shoreibah and told him that he wanted to become a
Muslim but before he took the irrevocable steps to formal conversion, he needed to have
more knowledge about Islam. He said that he had purchased from Orientalia Bookshop, some
books on Arabic grammar and was trying to teach himself Arabic. He apologized to us for
his broken English: Yiddish was his native tongue and Hebrew, his second language. Among
themselves, his family and friends spoke only Yiddish. Since his reading knowledge of
English was extremely poor, he had no access to good Islamic literature. However, with the
aid of an English dictionary, he painfully read "Introduction to Islam" by
Muhammad Hamidullah of Paris and praised this as the best book he had ever read. In the
presence of Dr. Shoreibah, I spent another hour with Mr. Kostelwitz, comparing the Bible
stories of the patriarchs and prophets with their counterparts in the Holy Quran. I
pointed out the inconsistencies and interpolations of the Bible, illustrating my point
with Noah's alleged drunkenness, accusing David of adultery and Solomon of idolatry (Allah
Forbid) and how the Holy Quran raises all these patriarchs to the status of genuine
prophets of God and absolves them from all these crimes. I also pointed out why it was
Ismail and not Isaac who God commanded Abraham to offer as sacrifice. In the Bible, God
tells Abraham: "Take thine son, thine only son whom thou lovest and offer him up to
Me as burnt offering." Now Ismail was born 13 years before Isaac but the Jewish
biblical commentators explain that away be belittling Ismail's mother, Hagar, as only a
concubine and not Abraham's real wife so they say Isaac was the only legitimate son.
Islamic traditions, however, raise Hagar to the status of a full-fledged wife equal in
every respect to Sarah. Mr. Kostelwitz expressed his deepest gratitude to me for spending
so much time, explaining those truths to him. To express this gratitude, he insisted on
inviting Dr. Shoreibah and me to lunch at the Kosher Jewish delicatessen where he always
goes to eat his lunch. Mr. Kostelwitz told us that he wished more than anything else to
embrace Islam but he feared he could not withstand the persecution he would have to face
from his family and friends. I told him to pray to God for help and strength and he
promised that he would. When he left us, I felt privileged to have spoken with such a
gentle and kind person.
Q: What Impact did Islam have on your life ?
A: In Islam, my quest for absolute values was
satisfied. In Islam I found all that was true, good and beautiful and that which gives
meaning and direction to human life (and death); while in other religions, the Truth is
deformed, distorted, restricted and fragmentary. If any one chooses to ask me how I came
to know this, I can only reply my personal life experience was sufficient to convince me.
My adherence to the Islamic faith is thus a calm, cool but very intense conviction. I
have, I believe, always been a Muslim at heart by temperament, even before I knew there
was such a thing as Islam. My conversion was mainly a formality, involving no radical
change in my heart at all but rather only making official what I had been thinking and
yearning for many years.
Also read Maryam Jameelah's Open
Letter to Her Parents in which she invites her mother and father to embrace the
one true religion.
Interview with Maryam Jameelah
Q: Would you kindly tell us how your interest in Islam
began?
A: I was Margaret (Peggy) Marcus. As a small child I
possessed a keen interest in music and was particularly fond of the classical operas and
symphonies considered high culture in the West. Music was my favorite subject in school in
which I always earned the highest grades. By sheer chance, I happened to hear Arabic music
over the radio which so much pleased me that I was determined to hear more. I would not
leave my parents in peace until my father finally took me to the Syrian section in New
York City where I bought a stack of Arabic recordings. My parents, relatives and neighbors
thought Arabic and its music dreadfully weird and so distressing to their ears that
whenever I put on my recordings, they demanded that I close all the doors and windows in
my room lest they be disturbed! After I embraced Islam in 1961, I used to sit enthralled
by the hour at the mosque in New York, listening to tape-recordings of Tilawat chanted by
the celebrated Egyptian Qari, Abdul Basit. But on Jumha Salat (Friday Prayers), the Imam
did not play the tapes. We had a special guest that day. A short, very thin and
poorly-dressed black youth, who introduced himself to us as a student from Zanzibar,
recited Surah ar-Rahman. I never heard such glorious Tilawat even from Abdul Basit! He
possessed such a voice of gold; surely Hazrat Bilal must have sounded much like him!
I traced the beginning of my interest in Islam to the age
of ten. While attending a reformed Jewish Sunday school, I became fascinated with the
historical relationship between the Jews and the Arabs. From my Jewish textbooks, I
learned that Abraham was the father of the Arabs as well as the Jews. I read how centuries
later when, in medieval Europe, Christian persecution made their lives intolerable, the
Jews were welcomed in Muslim Spain and that it was the magnanimity of this same Arabic
Islamic civilization which stimulated Hebrew culture to reach its highest peak of
achievement.
Totally unaware of the true nature of Zionism, I naively
thought that the Jews were returning to Palestine to strengthen their close ties of
kinship in religion and culture with their Semitic cousins. Together I believed that the
Jews and the Arabs would cooperate to attain another Golden Age of culture in the Middle
East.
Despite my fascination with the study of Jewish history, I
was extremely unhappy at the Sunday school. At this time I identified myself strongly with
the Jewish people in Europe, then suffering a horrible fate under the Nazis and I was
shocked that none of my fellow classmates nor their parents took their religion seriously.
During the services at the synagogue, the children used to read comic strips hidden in
their prayer books and laugh to scorn at the rituals. The children were so noisy and
disorderly that the teachers could not discipline them and found it very difficult to
conduct the classes.
At home the atmosphere for religious observance was
scarcely more congenial. My elder sister detested the Sunday school so much that my mother
literally had to drag her out of bed in the mornings and it never went without the
struggle of tears and hot words. Finally my parents were exhausted and let her quit. On
the Jewish High Holy Days instead of attending synagogue and fasting on Yom Kippur, my
sister and I were taken out of school to attend family picnics and parties in fine
restaurants. When my sister and I convinced our parents how miserable we both were at the
Sunday school they joined an agnostic, humanist organization known as the Ethical Culture
Movement.
The Ethical Culture Movement was founded late in the 19th
century by Felix Alder. While studying for rabbinate, Felix Alder grew convinced that
devotion to ethical values as relative and man-made, regarding any supernaturalism or
theology as irrelevant, constituted the only religion fit for the modern world. I attended
the Ethical Culture Sunday School each week from the age of eleven until I graduated at
fifteen. Here I grew into complete accord with the ideas of the movement and regarded all
traditional, organized religions with scorn.
When I was eighteen years old I became a member of the
local Zionist youth movement known as the Mizrachi Hatzair. But when I found out what the
nature of Zionism was, which made the hostility between Jews and Arabs irreconcilable, I
left several months later in disgust. When I was twenty and a student at New York
University, one of my elective courses was entitled Judaism in Islam. My professor, Rabbi
Abraham Isaac Katsh, the head of the department of Hebrew Studies there, spared no efforts
to convince his students--all Jews, many of whom aspired to become rabbis--that Islam was
derived from Judaism. Our textbook, written by him, took each verse from the Quran,
painstakingly tracing it to its allegedly Jewish source. Although his real aim was to
prove to his students the superiority of Judaism over Islam, he convinced me diametrically
of the opposite.
I soon discovered that Zionism was merely a combination of
the racist, tribalistic aspects of Judaism. Modern secular nationalistic Zionism was
further discredited in my eyes when I learned that few, if any, of the leaders of Zionism
were observant Jews and that perhaps nowhere is Orthodox, traditional Judaism regarded
with such intense contempt as in Israel. When I found nearly all important Jewish leaders
in America supporters for Zionism, who felt not the slightest twinge of conscience because
of the terrible injustice inflicted upon the Palestinian Arabs, I could no longer consider
myself a Jew at heart.
One morning in November 1954, Professor Katsh, during his
lecture, argued with irrefutable logic that the monotheism taught by Moses (peace be upon
him) and the Divine Laws reveled to him were indispensable as the basis for all higher
ethical values. If morals were purely man-made, as the Ethical Culture and other agnostic
and atheistic philosophies taught, then they could be changed at will, according to mere
whim, convenience or circumstance. The result would be utter chaos leading to individual
and collective ruin. Belief in the Hereafter, as the Rabbis in the Talmud taught, argued
Professor Katsh, was not mere wishful thinking but a moral necessity. Only those, he said,
who firmly believed that each of us will be summoned by God on Judgement Day to render a
complete account of our life on earth and rewarded or punished accordingly, will possess
the self-discipline to sacrifice transitory pleasure and endure hardships and sacrifice to
attain lasting good.
It was in Professor Katsh's class that I met Zenita, the
most unusual and fascinating girl I have ever met. The first time I entered Professor
Katsh's class, as I looked around the room for an empty desk in which to sit, I spied two
empty seats, on the arm of one, three big beautifully bound volumes of Yusuf Ali's English
translation and commentary of the Holy Quran. I sat down right there, burning with
curiosity to find out to whom these volumes belonged. Just before Rabbi Katsh's lecture
was to begin, a tall, very slim girl with pale complexion framed by thick auburn hair, sat
next to me. Her appearance was so distinctive, I thought she must be a foreign student
from Turkey, Syria or some other Near Eastern country. Most of the other students were
young men wearing the black cap of Orthodox Jewry, who wanted to become rabbis. We two
were the only girls in the class. As we were leaving the library late that afternoon, she
introduced herself to me. Born into an Orthodox Jewish family, her parents had migrated to
America from Russia only a few years prior to the October Revolution in 1917 to escape
persecution. I noted that my new friend spoke English with the precise care of a
foreigner. She confirmed these speculations, telling me that since her family and their
friends speak only Yiddish among themselves, she did not learn any English until after
attending public school. She told me that her name was Zenita Liebermann but recently, in
an attempt to Americanize themselves, her parents had changed their name from
"Liebermann" to "Lane." Besides being thoroughly instructed in Hebrew
by her father while growing up and also in school, she said she was now spending all her
spare time studying Arabic. However, with no previous warning, Zenita dropped out of class
and although I continued to attend all of his lectures to the conclusion of the course,
Zenita never returned. Months passed and I had almost forgotten about Zenita when suddenly
she called and begged me to meet her at the Metropolitan Museum and go with her to look at
the special exhibition of exquisite Arabic calligraphy and ancient illuminated manuscripts
of the Quran. During our tour of the museum, Zenita told me how she had embraced Islam
with two of her Palestinian friends as witnesses.
I inquired, "Why did you decide to become a
Muslim?" She then told me that she had left Professor Katsh's class when she fell ill
with a severe kidney infection. Her condition was so critical, she told me, her mother and
father had not expected her to survive. "One afternoon while burning with fever, I
reached for my Holy Quran on the table beside by bed and began to read and while I recited
the verses, it touched me so deeply that I began to weep and then I knew I would recover.
As soon as I was strong enough to leave my bed, I summoned two of my Muslim friends and
took the oath of the "Shahadah" or Confession of Faith."
Zenita and I would eat our meals in Syrian restaurants
where I acquired a keen taste for this tasty cooking. When we had money to spend, we would
order Couscous, roast lamb with rice or a whole soup plate of delicious little meatballs
swimming in gravy scooped up with loaves of unleavened Arabic bread. And when we had
little to spend, we would eat lentils and rice, Arabic style, or the Egyptian national
dish of black broad beans with plenty of garlic and onions called "Ful".
While Professor Katsh was lecturing thus, I was comparing
in my mind what I had read in the Old Testament and the Talmud with what was taught in the
Quran and Hadith and finding Judaism so defective, I was converted to Islam.
Q: Were you scared that you might not be accepted by the
Muslims?
A: My increasing sympathy for Islam and Islamic ideals
enraged the other Jews I knew, who regarded me as having betrayed them in the worst
possible way. They used to tell me that such a reputation could only result from shame of
my ancestral heritage and an intense hatred for my people. They warned me that even if I
tried to become a Muslim, I would never be accepted. These fears proved totally unfounded
as I have never been stigmatized by any Muslim because of my Jewish origin. As soon as I
became a Muslim myself, I was welcomed most enthusiastically by all the Muslims as one of
them.
I did not embrace Islam out of hatred for my ancestral
heritage or my people. It was not a desire so much to reject as to fulfill. To me, it
meant a transition from parochial to a dynamic and revolutionary faith.
Q: Did your family object to your studying Islam?
A: Although I wanted to become a Muslim as far back as
1954, my family managed to argue me out of it. I was warned that Islam would complicate my
life because it is not, like Judaism and Christianity, part of the American scene. I was
told that Islam would alienate me from my family and isolate me from the community. At
that time my faith was not sufficiently strong to withstand these pressures. Partly as the
result of this inner turmoil, I became so ill that I had to discontinue college long
before it was time for me to graduate. For the next two years I remained at home under
private medical care, steadily growing worse. In desperation from 1957 - 1959 my parents
confined me both to private and public hospitals where I vowed that if ever I recovered
sufficiently to be discharged, I would embrace Islam.
After I was allowed to return home, I investigated all the
opportunities for meeting Muslims in New York City. It was my good fortune to meet some of
the finest men and women anyone could ever hope to meet. I also began to write articles
for Muslim magazines.
Q: What was the attitude of your parents and friends after
you became Muslim?
A: When I embraced Islam, my parents, relatives and
their friends regarded me almost as a fanatic, because I could think and talk of nothing
else. To them, religion is a purely private concern which at the most perhaps could be
cultivated like an amateur hobby among other hobbies. But as soon as I read the Holy
Quran, I knew that Islam was no hobby but life itself!
Q: In what ways did the Holy Quran have an impact on your
life?
A: One evening I was feeling particularly exhausted and
sleepless, Mother came into my room and said she was about to go to the Larchmont Public
Library and asked me if there was any book that I wanted? I asked her to look and see if
the library had a copy of an English translation of the Holy Quran. Just think, years of
passionate interest in the Arabs and reading every book in the library about them I could
lay my hands on but until now, I never thought to see what was in the Holy Quran! Mother
returned with a copy for me. I was so eager, I literally grabbed it from her hands and
read it the whole night. There I also found all the familiar Bible stories of my
childhood.
In my eight years of primary school, four years of
secondary school and one year of college, I learned about English grammar and composition,
French, Spanish, Latin and Greek in current use, Arithmetic, Geometry, Algebra, European
and American history, elementary science, Biology, music and art--but I had never learned
anything about God! Can you imagine I was so ignorant of God that I wrote to my
pen-friend, a Pakistani lawyer, and confessed to him the reason why I was an atheist was
because I couldn't believe that God was really an old man with a long white beard who sat
up on His throne in Heaven. When he asked me where I had learned this outrageous thing, I
told him of the reproductions from the Sistine Chapel I had seen in "Life"
Magazine of Michelangelo's "Creation" and "Original Sin." I described
all the representations of God as an old man with a long white beard and the numerous
crucifixions of Christ I had seen with Paula at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. But in the
Holy Quran, I read:
"Allah! There is no god but He,-the Living, The
Self-subsisting, Supporter of all. No slumber can seize Him nor sleep. His are all things
in the heavens and on earth. Who is thee can intercede in His presence except as He
permiteth? He knoweth what (appeareth to His creatures as) before or after or behind them.
Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His Throne doth extend
over the heavens and the earth, and He feeleth no fatigue in guarding and preserving them
for He is the Most High, the Supreme (in glory)." (Quran S.2:255)
"But the Unbelievers,-their deeds are like a mirage
in sandy deserts, which the man parched with thirst mistakes for water; until when he
comes up to it, he finds Allah there, and Allah will pay him his account: and Allah is
swift in taking account. Or (the unbelievers' state) is like the depths of darkness in a
vast deep ocean, overwhelmed with billow topped by billow, topped by (dark) clouds: depth
of darkness, one above another: if a man stretches out his hand, he can hardly see it! for
any to whom Allah giveth not light, there is no light!" (Quran S.24: 39-40)
My first thought when reading the Holy Quran - this is the
only true religion - absolutely sincere, honest, not allowing cheap compromises or
hypocrisy.
In 1959, I spent much of my leisure time reading books
about Islam in the New York Public Library. It was there I discovered four bulky volumes
of an English translation of Mishkat ul- Masabih. It was then that I learned that a proper
and detailed understanding of the Holy Quran is not possible without some knowledge of the
relevant Hadith. For how can the holy text correctly be interpreted except by the Prophet
to whom it was revealed?
Once I had studied the Mishkat, I began to accept the Holy
Quran as Divine revelation. What persuaded me that the Quran must be from God and not
composed by Muhammad (PBUH) was its satisfying and convincing answers to all the most
important questions of life which I could not find elsewhere.
As a child, I was so mortally afraid of death, particularly
the thought of my own death, that after nightmares about it, sometimes I would awaken my
parents crying in the middle of the night. When I asked them why I had to die and what
would happen to me after death, all they could say was that I had to accept the
inevitable; but that was a long way off and because medical science was constantly
advancing, perhaps I would live to be a hundred years old! My parents, family, and all our
friends rejected as superstition any thought of the Hereafter, regarding Judgment Day,
reward in Paradise or punishment in Hell as outmoded concepts of by-gone ages. In vain I
searched all the chapters of the Old Testament for any clear and unambiguous concept of
the Hereafter. The prophets, patriarchs and sages of the Bible all receive their rewards
or punishments in this world. Typical is the story of Job (Hazrat Ayub). God destroyed all
his loved-ones, his possessions, and afflicted him with a loathsome disease in order to
test his faith. Job plaintively laments to God why He should make a righteous man suffer.
At the end of the story, God restores all his earthly losses but nothing is even mentioned
about any possible consequences in the Hereafter.
Although I did find the Hereafter mentioned in the New
Testament, compared with that of the Holy Quran, it is vague and ambiguous. I found no
answer to the question of death in Orthodox Judaism, for the Talmud preaches that even the
worst life is better than death. My parents' philosophy was that one must avoid
contemplating the thought of death and just enjoy as best one can, the pleasures life has
to offer at the moment. According to them, the purpose of life is enjoyment and pleasure
achieved through self-expression of one's talents, the love of family, the congenial
company of friends combined with the comfortable living and indulgence in the variety of
amusements that affluent America makes available in such abundance. They deliberately
cultivated this superficial approach to life as if it were the guarantee for their
continued happiness and good-fortune. Through bitter experience I discovered that
self-indulgence leads only to misery and that nothing great or even worthwhile is ever
accomplished without struggle through adversity and self-sacrifice. From my earliest
childhood, I have always wanted to accomplish important and significant things. Above all
else, before my death I wanted the assurance that I have not wasted life in sinful deeds
or worthless pursuits. All my life I have been intensely serious-minded. I have always
detested the frivolity which is the dominant characteristic of contemporary culture. My
father once disturbed me with his unsettling conviction that there is nothing of permanent
value and because everything in this modern age accept the present trends inevitable and
adjust ourselves to them. I, however, was thirsty to attain something that would endure
forever. It was from the Holy Quran where I learned that this aspiration was possible. No
good deed for the sake of seeking the pleasure of God is ever wasted or lost. Even if the
person concerned never achieves any worldly recognition, his reward is certain in the
Hereafter. Conversely, the Quran tells us that those who are guided by no moral
considerations other than expediency or social conformity and crave the freedom to do as
they please, no matter how much worldly success and prosperity they attain or how keenly
they are able to relish the short span of their earthly life, will be doomed as the losers
on Judgement Day. Islam teaches us that in order to devote our exclusive attention to
fulfilling our duties to God and to our fellow-beings, we must abandon all vain and
useless activities which distract us from this end. These teachings of the Holy Quran,
made even more explicit by Hadith, were thoroughly compatible with my temperament.
Q: What is your opinion of the Arabs after you became a
Muslim?
A: As the years passed, the realization gradually
dawned upon me that it was not the Arabs who made Islam great but rather Islam had made
the Arabs great. Were it not for the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), the Arabs would be an
obscure people today. And were it not for the Holy Quran, the Arabic language would be
equally insignificant, if not extinct.
Q: Did you see any similarities between Judaism and
Islam?
A: The kinship between Judaism and Islam is even
stronger than Islam and Christianity. Both Judaism and Islam share in common the same
uncompromising monotheism, the crucial importance of strict obedience to Divine Law as
proof of our submission to and love of the Creator, the rejection of the priesthood,
celibacy and monasticism and the striking similarity of the Hebrew and Arabic language.
In Judaism, religion is so confused with nationalism, one
can scarcely distinguish between the two. The name "Judaism" is derived from
Judah-a tribe. A Jew is a member of the tribe of Judah. Even the name of this religion
connotes no universal spiritual message. A Jew is not a Jew by virtue of his belief in the
unity of God, but merely because he happened to be born of Jewish parentage. Should he
become an outspoken atheist, he is no less "Jewish" in the eyes of his fellow
Jews.
Such a thorough corruption with nationalism has spiritually
impoverished this religion in all its aspects. God is not the God of all mankind but the
God of Israel. The scriptures are not God's revelation to the entire human race but
primarily a Jewish history book. David and Solomon (peace be upon them) are not
full-fledged prophets of God but merely Jewish kings. With the single exception of Yom
Kippur (the Jewish Day of Atonement), the holidays and festivals celebrated by Jews, such
as Hanukkah, Purim and Pesach, are of far greater national than religious significance.
Q: Have you ever had the opportunity to talk about Islam to
the other Jews?
A: There is one particular incident which really stands
out in my mind when I had the opportunity to discuss Islam with a Jewish gentleman. Dr.
Shoreibah, of the Islamic Center in New York, introduced me to a very special guest. After
one Jumha Salat, I went into his office to ask him some questions about Islam but before I
could even greet him with "Assalamu Alaikum", I was completely astonished and
surprised to see seated before him an ultra-orthodox Chassidic Jew, complete with
earlocks, broad-brimmed black hat, long black silken caftan and a full flowing beard.
Under his arm was a copy of the Yiddish newspaper, "The Daily Forward". He told
us that his name was Samuel Kostelwitz and that he worked in New York City as a diamond
cutter. Most of his family, he said, lived in the Chassidic community of Williamsburg in
Brooklyn, but he also had many relatives and friends in Israel. Born in a small Rumanian
town, he had fled from the Nazi terror with his parents to America just prior to the
outbreak of the second world-war. I asked him what had brought him to the mosque? He told
us that he had been stricken with intolerable grief ever since his mother died 5 years
ago. He had tried to find solace and consolation for his grief in the synagogue but could
not when he discovered that many of the Jews, even in the ultra-orthodox community of
Williamsburg, were shameless hypocrites. His recent trip to Israel had left him more
bitterly disillusioned than ever. He was shocked by the irreligiousness he found in Israel
and he told us that nearly all the young sabras or native-born Israelis are militant
atheists. When he saw large herds of swine on one of the kibbutzim (collective farms) he
visited, he could only exclaim in horror: "Pigs in a Jewish state! I never thought
that was possible until I came here! Then when I witnessed the brutal treatment meted out
to innocent Arabs in Israel, I know then that there is no difference between the Israelis
and the Nazis. Never, never in the name of God, could I justify such terrible
crimes!" Then he turned to Dr. Shoreibah and told him that he wanted to become a
Muslim but before he took the irrevocable steps to formal conversion, he needed to have
more knowledge about Islam. He said that he had purchased from Orientalia Bookshop, some
books on Arabic grammar and was trying to teach himself Arabic. He apologized to us for
his broken English: Yiddish was his native tongue and Hebrew, his second language. Among
themselves, his family and friends spoke only Yiddish. Since his reading knowledge of
English was extremely poor, he had no access to good Islamic literature. However, with the
aid of an English dictionary, he painfully read "Introduction to Islam" by
Muhammad Hamidullah of Paris and praised this as the best book he had ever read. In the
presence of Dr. Shoreibah, I spent another hour with Mr. Kostelwitz, comparing the Bible
stories of the patriarchs and prophets with their counterparts in the Holy Quran. I
pointed out the inconsistencies and interpolations of the Bible, illustrating my point
with Noah's alleged drunkenness, accusing David of adultery and Solomon of idolatry (Allah
Forbid) and how the Holy Quran raises all these patriarchs to the status of genuine
prophets of God and absolves them from all these crimes. I also pointed out why it was
Ismail and not Isaac who God commanded Abraham to offer as sacrifice. In the Bible, God
tells Abraham: "Take thine son, thine only son whom thou lovest and offer him up to
Me as burnt offering." Now Ismail was born 13 years before Isaac but the Jewish
biblical commentators explain that away be belittling Ismail's mother, Hagar, as only a
concubine and not Abraham's real wife so they say Isaac was the only legitimate son.
Islamic traditions, however, raise Hagar to the status of a full-fledged wife equal in
every respect to Sarah. Mr. Kostelwitz expressed his deepest gratitude to me for spending
so much time, explaining those truths to him. To express this gratitude, he insisted on
inviting Dr. Shoreibah and me to lunch at the Kosher Jewish delicatessen where he always
goes to eat his lunch. Mr. Kostelwitz told us that he wished more than anything else to
embrace Islam but he feared he could not withstand the persecution he would have to face
from his family and friends. I told him to pray to God for help and strength and he
promised that he would. When he left us, I felt privileged to have spoken with such a
gentle and kind person.
Q: What Impact did Islam have on your life ?
A: In Islam, my quest for absolute values was
satisfied. In Islam I found all that was true, good and beautiful and that which gives
meaning and direction to human life (and death); while in other religions, the Truth is
deformed, distorted, restricted and fragmentary. If any one chooses to ask me how I came
to know this, I can only reply my personal life experience was sufficient to convince me.
My adherence to the Islamic faith is thus a calm, cool but very intense conviction. I
have, I believe, always been a Muslim at heart by temperament, even before I knew there
was such a thing as Islam. My conversion was mainly a formality, involving no radical
change in my heart at all but rather only making official what I had been thinking and
yearning for many years.
Also read Maryam Jameelah's Open
Letter to Her Parents in which she invites her mother and father to embrace the
one true religion.
Saturday, December 30, 2006
TESTIMONIES OF JEWISH CONVERTS TO ISLAM
These are True Stories
of Jewish People who followed Judaism and became Muslim, despite the Israeli Arab
political conflict, more and more Jews are realizing
that Judaism and
Christianity are light houses leading to Islam, whether you were a Messianic Jew, a Jew
for Jesus, or an Orthodox Jew, any Jew can be for Allah. Because Everyone
is born a Muslim (in Submission to Allah) Everyday Jews are Returning
(Reverting) to their Religion of Birth and the Religion of Abraham, Moses, and
all the past Prophets, Islam.
Abdullah Ibn Sailam
Al-Husayn ibn Sailam was a Jewish rabbi in Yathrib who was
widely respected and honored by the people of the city even by those who were
not Jewish. He was known for his piety and goodness, his upright conduct and
his truthfulness.
Al-Husayn lived a peaceful and gentle life but he was serious, purposeful and
organized in the way he spent his time. For a fixed period each day, he would
worship, teach and preach in the temple. Then he would spend some time in his
orchard, looking after date palms, pruning and pollinating. Thereafter, to
increase his understanding and knowledge of his religion, he would devote
himself to the study of the Torah.
In this study, it is said. he was particularly struck by some verses of the
Torah which dealt with the coming of a Prophet who would complete the message
of previous Prophets. Al-Husayn therefore took an immediate and keen interest
when he heard reports of the appearance of a Prophet in Makkah. He said:
"W hen I heard of the appearance of the Messenger of God, peace be on
him, I began to make enquiries about his name, his genealogy, his
characteristics, his time and place and I began to compare this information
with what is contained m our books. From these enquiries, I became convinced
about the authenticity of his prophethood and I affirmed the truth of his
mission. However, I concealed my conclusions from the Jews. I held my
tongue...
Then came the day when the Prophet, peace be on him, left Makkah and headed
for Yathrib. When he reached Yathrib and stopped at Quba, a man came rushing
into the city, calling out to people and announcing the arrival of the
Prophet. At that moment, I was at the top of a palm tree doing some work. My
aunt, Khalidah bint al-Harith, was sitting under the tree. On hearing the
news, I shouted:
'Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! (God is Great! God is Great!' When my aunt heard
my takbir, she remonstrated with me: 'May God frustrate you...By God, if you
had heard that Moses was coming you would not have been more enthusiastic.'
'Auntie, he is really, by God, the 'brother' of Moses and follows his
religion. He was sent with the same mission as Moses.' She was silent for a
while and then said: 'Is he the Prophet about whom you spoke to us who would
be sent to confirm the truth preached by previous (Prophets) and complete the
message of his Lord?' 'Yes,' I replied.
Without any delay or hesitation, I went out to meet the Prophet. I saw crowds
of people at his door. I moved about in the crowds until I reached close to
him. The first words I heard him say were:
'O people! Spread peace...Share food...Pray during the night
while people (normally) sleep... and you will enter Paradise in peace...'
I looked at him closely. I scrutinized him and was convinced that his face was
not that of an imposter. I went closer to him and made the declaration of
faith that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of
Allah.
The Prophet turned to me and asked: 'What is your name?' 'Al-Husayn ibn Sailam,'
I replied.
'Instead, it is (now) Abdullah ibn Sallam,' he said (giving me a new name).
'Yes,' I agreed. 'Abdullah ibn Sailam (it shall be). By Him who has sent you
with the Truth, I do not wish to have another name after this day.'
I returned home and introduced Islam to my wife, my children and the rest of
my household. They all accepted Islam including my aunt Khalidah who was then
an old lady. However, I advised them then to conceal our acceptance of Islam
from the Jews until I gave them permission. They agreed.
Subsequently, I went back to the Prophet, peace be on him, and said: 'O
Messenger of God! The Jews are a people (inclined to) slander and falsehood. I
want you to invite their most prominent men to meet you. (During the meeting
however), you should keep me concealed from them in one of your rooms. Ask
them then about my status among them before they find out of my acceptance of
Islam. Then invite them to Islam. If they were to know that I have become a
Muslim, they would denounce me and accuse me of everything base and slander
me.'
The Prophet kept me in one of his rooms and invited the prominent Jewish
personalities to visit him. He introduced Islam to them and urged them to have
faith in God...They began to dispute and argue with him about the Truth. When
he realized that they were not inclined to accept Islam, he put the question
to them:
'What is the status of Al-Husayn ibn Sailam among you?'
'He is our sayyid (leader) and the son of our sayyid. He is our rabbi and our
alim (scholar), the son of our rabbi and alim.'
'If you come to know that he has accepted Islam, would you accept Islam also?'
asked the Prophet.
'God forbid! He would not accept Islam. May God protect him from accepting
Islam,' they said (horrified).
At this point I came out in full view of them and announced: 'O assembly of
Jews! Be conscious of God and accept what Muhammad has brought. By God, you
certainly know that he is the Messenger of God and you can find prophecies
about him and mention of his name and characteristics in your Torah. I for my
part declare that he is the Messenger of God. I have faith in him and believe
that he is true. I know him.'
'You are a liar,' they shouted. 'By God, you are evil and ignorant, the son of
an evil and ignorant person.' And they continued to heap every conceivable
abuse on me..."
Abdullah ibn Sailam approached Islam with a soul thirsty for knowledge. He was
passionately devoted to the Quran and spent much time reciting and studying
its beautiful and sublime verses. He was deeply attached to the noble Prophet
and was constantly in his company.
Much of his time he spent in the masjid, engaged in worship, in learning and
in teaching. He was known for his sweet, moving and effective way of teaching
study circles of Sahabah who assembled regularly in the Prophet's mosque.
Abdullah ibn Sallam was known among the Sahabah as a man from ahl-al-Jannah
"- the people of Paradise. This was because of his determination on the
advice of the Prophet to hold steadfastly to the "most trustworthy
handhold" that is belief in and total submission to God.

Michael Wolfe
“I did not want to ‘trade in’ my culture. I wanted access to new
meanings.” - How an American writer born of a Jewish father and a
Christian mother found spiritual fulfillment in Islam.
After
twenty-five years a writer in America, I wanted something to soften my
cynicism. I was searching for new terms by which to see. The way one is
raised establishes certain needs in this department. From a pluralist
background, I naturally placed great stress on the matters of racism
and freedom. Then, in my early twenties, I had gone to live in Africa
for three years. During this time, which was formative for me, I did
rubbed shoulders with blacks of many different tribes, with Arabs,
Berbers, and even Europeans, who were Muslims. By and large these
people did not share the Western obsession with race as a social
category. In our encounters being oddly colored rarely mattered. I was
welcomed first and judged on merit later. By contrast, Europeans and
Americans, including many who are free of racist notions, automatically
class people racially. Muslims classified people by their faith and
their actions. I found this transcendent and refreshing. Malcolm X saw
his nation’s salvation in it. “America needs to understand Islam,” he
wrote, “because this is the one religion that erases from its society
the race problem”.
I was looking for an escape route, too,
from the isolating terms of a materialistic culture. I wanted access to
a spiritual dimension, but the conventional paths I had known as a boy
were closed. My father had been a Jew; my mother Christian. Because of
my mongrel background, I had a foot in two religious camps. Both faiths
were undoubtedly profound. Yet the one that emphasizes a chosen people
I found insupportable; while the other, based in a mystery, repelled
me. A century before, my maternal great-great-grandmother’s name had
been set in stained glass at the high street Church of Christ in
Hamilton, Ohio. By the time I was twenty, this meant nothing to me.
These
were the terms my early life provided. The more I thought about it now,
the more I returned to my experiences in Muslim Africa. After two
return trips to Morocco, in 1981 and 1985, I came to feel that Africa,
the continent, had little to do with the balanced life I found there.
It was not, that is, a continent I was after, nor an institution,
either. I was looking for a framework I could live with, a vocabulary
of spiritual concepts applicable to the life I was living now. I did
not want to “trade in” my culture. I wanted access to new meanings.
After
a mid-Atlantic dinner I went to wash up in the bathroom. During my
absence a quorum of Hasidim lined up to pray outside the door. By the
time I had finished, they were too immersed to notice me. Emerging from
the bathroom, I could barely work the handle. Stepping into the aisle
was out of the question.
I could only stand with my head
thrust into the hallway, staring at the congregation’s backs. Holding
palm-size prayer books, they cut an impressive figure, tapping the
texts on their breastbones as they divined. Little by little the
movements grew erratic, like a mild, bobbing form of rock and roll. I
watched from the bathroom door until they were finished, then slipped
back down the aisle to my seat.
We landed together later that
night in Brussels. Reboarding, I found a discarded Yiddish newspaper on
a food tray. When the plane took off for Morocco, they were gone.
I
do not mean to imply here that my life during this period conformed to
any grand design. In the beginning, around 1981, I was driven by
curiosity and an appetite for travel. My favorite place to go, when I
had the money, was Morocco. When I could not travel, there were books.
This fascination brought me into contact with a handful of writers
driven to the exotic, authors capable of sentences like this, by Freya
Stark:
The perpetual charm of Arabia is that the traveller
finds his level there simply as a human being; the people’s directness,
deadly to the sentimental or the pedantic, like the less complicated
virtues; and the pleasantness of being liked for oneself might, I
think, be added to the five reasons for travel given me by Sayyid
Abdulla, the watchmaker; “to leave one’s troubles behind one; to earn a
living; to acquire learning; to practice good manners; and to meet
honorable men”.
I could not have drawn up a list of demands,
but I had a fair idea of what I was after. The religion I wanted should
be to metaphysics as metaphysics is to science. It would not be
confined by a narrow rationalism or traffic in mystery to please its
priests. There would be no priests, no separation between nature and
things sacred. There would be no war with the flesh, if I could help
it. Sex would be natural, not the seat of a curse upon the species.
Finally, I did want a ritual component, daily routine to sharpen the
senses and discipline my mind. Above all, I wanted clarity and freedom.
I did not want to trade away reason simply to be saddled with a dogma.
The more I learned about Islam, the more it appeared to conform to what I was after.
Most
of the educated Westerners I knew around this time regarded any strong
religious climate with suspicion. They classified religion as political
manipulation, or they dismissed it as a medieval concept, projecting
upon it notions from their European past.
It was not hard to
find a source for their opinions. A thousand years of Western history
had left us plenty of fine reasons to regret a path that led through so
much ignorance and slaughter. From the Children’s Crusade and the
Inquisition to the transmogrified faiths of nazism and communism during
our century, whole countries have been exhausted by belief. Nietzsche’s
fear, that the modern nation-state would become a substitute religion,
have proved tragically accurate. Our century, it seemed to me, was
ending in an age beyond belief, which believers inhabited as much as
agnostics.
Regardless of church affiliation, secular humanism
is the air westerners breathe, the lens we gaze through. Like any world
view, this outlook is pervasive and transparent. It forms the basis of
our broad identification with democracy and with the pursuit of freedom
in all its countless and beguiling forms. Immersed in our shared
preoccupations, one may easily forget that other ways of life exist on
the same planet.
At the time of my trip, for instance, 650
million Muslims with a majority representation in forty-four countries
adhered to the formal teachings of Islam. In addition, about 400
million more were living as minorities in Europe, Asia and the
Americas. Assisted by postcolonial economics, Islam has become in a
matter of thirty years a major faith in Western Europe. Of the world’s
great religions, Islam alone was adding to its fold.
My
politicized friends were dismayed by my new interest. They all but
universally confused Islam with the machinations of half a dozen middle
eastern tyrants. The books they read, the new broadcasts they viewed
depicted the faith as a set of political functions. Almost nothing was
said of its spiritual practice. I liked to quote Mae West to them:
“Anytime you take religion for a joke, the laugh’s on you”.
Historically
a Muslim sees Islam as the final, matured expression of an original
religion reaching back to Adam. It is as resolutely monotheistic as
Judaism, whose major Prophets Islam reveres as links in a progressive
chain, culminating in Jesus and Muhammad. Essentially a message of
renewal, Islam has done its part on the world stage to return the
forgotten taste of life’s lost sweetness to millions of people. Its
book, the Qur’an, caused Goethe to remark, “You see, this teaching
never fails; with all our systems, we cannot go, and generally speaking
no man can go, further”.
Traditional Islam is expressed
through the practice of five pillars. Declaring one’s faith, prayer,
charity, and fasting are activities pursued repeatedly throughout one’s
life. Conditions permitting, each Muslim is additionally charged with
undertaking a pilgrimage to Mecca once in a lifetime. The Arabic term
for this fifth rite is Hadj. Scholars relate the word to the concept of
kasd, “aspiration,” and to the notion of men and women as travelers on
earth. In Western religions pilgrimage is a vestigial tradition, a
quaint, folkloric concept commonly reduced to metaphor. Among Muslims,
on the other hand, the hadj embodies a vital experience for millions of
new pilgrims every year. In spite of the modern content of their lives,
it remains an act of obedience, a profession of belief, and the visible
expression of a spiritual community. For a majority of Muslims the hadj
is an ultimate goal, the trip of a lifetime.
As a convert I felt obliged to go to Makkah. As an addict to travel I could not imagine a more compelling goal.
The
annual, month-long fast of Ramadan precedes the hadj by about one
hundred days. These two rites form a period of intensified awareness in
Muslim society. I wanted to put this period to use. I had read about
Islam; I had joined a Mosque near my home in California; I had started
a practice. Now I hoped to deepen what I was learning by submerging
myself in a religion where Islam infuses every aspect of existence.
I
planned to begin in Morocco, because I knew that country well and
because it followed traditional Islam and was fairly stable. The last
place I wanted to start was in a backwater full of uproarious
sectarians. I wanted to paddle the mainstream, the broad, calm water.
About Michael Wolfe
Michael Wolfe is the author of books of
poetry, fiction, travel, and history. His most recent works are a pair
of books from Grove Press on the pilgrimage to Mecca: “The Hajj”
(1993), a first-person travel account, and “One Thousand Roads to
Mecca” (1997), an anthology of 10 centuries of travelers writing about
the Muslim pilgrimage. In April 1997, he hosted a televised account of
the Hajj from Mecca for Ted Koppel’s “Nightline” on ABC. He is
currently at work on a four-hour television documentary on the life and
times of the Prophet Muhammad.
Read Michael Wolfe’s articles on Beliefnet.com
Michael Wolfe’s books on Amazon

  The
Hajj: One American's Pilgrimage to Mecca
Dear members of Love Your
Lord group welcome and As-Salaam-Alaikum .
As the season of Hajj (Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca for visiting and praying at
the [ Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<span [...] ,>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.] <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><span class="insertedphoto"><center><span class="insertedphoto"><img class="alignleft" src="http://images.sufi786.multiply.com/image/1/photos/upload/300x300/RZbfAAoKCkcAAB1FZgI1/wolfe.jpg?et=CTtvBNc%2CJKreHp5TewNuHw" border="0"></span><img class="alignmiddle" src="http://images.sufi786.multiply.com/image/1/photos/upload/300x300/RZbcSwoKCkcAAHMCeJw1/ABC%20HAJJ.jpg?et=OhpDt7TdM8iCRCpSnrR%2CkA" border="0"></center><br></span><span class="detailtitle"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">The
Hajj: One American's Pilgrimage to Mecca</span></span></p><br><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><br><span class="detailtitle"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"></span></span><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p> </o:p></span><span style="font-size: 16pt; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);">Dear members of Love Your
Lord group welcome and As-Salaam-Alaikum .</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt;">
As the season of Hajj (Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca for visiting and praying at
the </span><span id="spckbody"><span style="font-size: 16pt;" times="" new="" roman="" ,="" serif="" ;="">Ka'abah </span></span><span style="font-size: 16pt;">house of Allah, one of the Five Pillars of Islam) is underway at Mecca now,
I have the pleasure to announce that the video made by ABC -"The Hajj: One American's Pilgrimage to Mecca"</span><span style="font-size: 16pt;"> will be available for the viewing of
Members in this group video section side by side with </span><span style="font-size: 16pt;">documentary Inside
Mecca made by National Geographic</span><span style="font-size: 16pt;"> in couple of days (if Allah wills).<o:p></o:p></span>
</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt;">Thank You<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt;">Sufi786</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p> </o:p></span><span style="color: rgb(153, 51, 0);" class="detailtitle"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">The
Hajj: One American's Pilgrimage to Mecca</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal; color: rgb(153, 51, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">Description<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal; color: rgb(153, 51, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; color: rgb(153, 51, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">For over 1,400 years, Muslims have
been performing the pilgrimage, or Hajj, to the sacred site of Mecca. In modern
times, approximately two million Muslims make the pilgrimage to Mecca each
year, a trip required of all Muslims at least once in lifetime if they are
financially and physically able. During the Hajj, Muslims from all over the
world come together for a few days to participate in common rituals, joined together
by their shared faith in the most holy places of Islam, the city and
surrounding areas of Mecca. As the birthplace of the Prophet Muhammad and the
site where he first received Qur’anic revelation, Mecca is a place of great
spirituality and tradition. <br>
<br>
Since only Muslims may enter Mecca, it is a place that few Americans will get
to see, which makes this piece especially interesting. Following
writer/producer Michael Wolfe, the film documents his second trip or Hajj for
ABC News’ Nightline. One of the more than seven million Muslims in the United
States, Wolfe is a convert to Islam, born to a Christian mother and a Jewish
father. Speaking live from the Ka’ba, the Great Mosque in Mecca, in an
interview with ABC News’ Ted Koppel, Wolfe takes viewers step-by-step through
both the physical and spiritual aspects of the pilgrimage, explaining the
origins and meanings of the various rituals.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="color: rgb(153, 51, 0);" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 16pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<!-- multiply:no_crosspost --><p class='multiply:no_crosspost'></p>
Question:
If God is Benevolent and Omnipotent, then why is there existence of
evil in the world? If God allows evil to exist, then He is not
all-good. If God cannot help but allow evil to exist, then he is not
all-powerful.
Answer:
The word ‘Evil’ is generally used in two separate connotations.
Firstly, it is used for reference to the bad deeds of people; for
instance lying, injustice, oppression etc. Secondly, it is used for
circumstances and conditions, which people consider as ‘not good’; for
instance poverty, earthquakes, natural calamities, drought etc. The
above question is generally asked from both perspectives, i.e. ‘if God
is All-good, then why does He allow people to do evil?’ and ‘if God is
All-good, then why is there is so much suffering in this world?’.
As far as the first question is concerned, evil deeds are, in fact,
a result of the freewill that God has bestowed upon man, for the
particular purpose of the test, during the life of this world. This
‘test’ would not have been possible without granting man the freewill
to deviate from the right path, if man so desired. Thus, the Qur’an
(Al-Maaidah 5: 48) says:
And had God so desired, He would have made you a single people [and
not given you the freedom to deviate], but for the purpose of testing
you in what He has bestowed upon you [He granted you freedom].
At another instance, the Qur’an also tells us that God created man
on the path of ‘good’, evil came into existence only because of man’s
deviation from that ‘good’. The Quran says:
“And [in the beginning,] people were but a single nation
[on the path of piety], but then they started creating differences [and
thus, deviated from the right path]. And had it not been for God’s
decision, which had preceded [regarding testing man and allowing him
time], the matter would have been [immediately] decided between them,
regarding what they differed in.” (Yunus 10:19)
It is clear from the cited verses that ‘evil deeds’ are only a
product of man’s deviation from the right path, which, in turn, is the
result of the freewill, which God has bestowed upon man. One may,
however, say that when man commits a sin - deviates from the right path
- God should restrict his freedom.
Even though, it was possible for God to do so, yet doing so would
effectively have meant taking away man’s freewill and, thereby,
terminating his test.
This is precisely what is referred in the above-cited verse in the
words: “had it not been for God’s decision, which had preceded
[regarding testing man and allowing him time], the matter would have
been [immediately] decided between them, regarding what they differed
in.”
Hence, for the purpose of making the test possible, it was necessary
to allow man to deviate from the prescribed path, if he so desired,
without following such deviation with any immediate punishment: as an
immediate punishment for doing ‘evil’ and an immediate reward for doing
‘good’ would also have rendered the ‘test’ ineffective and impossible.
The Qur’an says:
And had God [immediately] punished people for their
deeds, He would not have left any moving creature on the face of the
earth. But He allows them [to do their deeds] till an appointed time.
Then, when that time comes… Indeed, God is fully watchful over His
people. (Faatir 35: 45)
As should be obvious, there is nothing in the concept of ‘test’,
which refutes God’s benevolence, mercy or His being all-good.
Nevertheless, if all were to end with man’s death, if ‘good’ and ‘evil’
were not to meet their separate ends, if the test, during the life of
this world, were abandoned without its logical results - this would
then, indeed, refute all benevolence, mercy, justice and goodness of
the Creator.
It is because of this reason that the Qur’an has emphatically
declared that it would not be all over at man’s death and that at the
end of the ‘test’, man shall be rewarded or punished for his
performance during this ‘test’. Thus, the verse of Al-Maaidah cited
above, goes further to say:
Therefore, excel in good deeds, to your Lord shall be the return of
all of you, then He shall inform you regarding that, in which you
differed.
Now, let us turn to the second question. The Qur’an tells us that
the ‘good’ and the ‘bad’ times are also a part of the ‘test’ of man. It
tells us that ‘good’ times are a test of man’s gratitude, while ‘bad’
times are a test of man’s perseverance and steadfastness in God’s ways.
The Qur’an says:
We shall try you with good and bad times, as a test. And to Us shall you return. (Al-Anbiyaa 21: 35)
The Qur’an also tells us that the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ times for a
particular individual or a people is not merely a test for that
particular individual or people alone. It is also a test for all
others, who directly or indirectly come in contact with those
individuals or people.
For instance, loss of wealth of an individual is a ‘test’ of
perseverance and steadfastness for that particular individual, on the
one hand, while on the other, it is a ‘test’ for those living around
that individual, insofar as how they behave and help out that
particular individual in his hard times.
Similarly, a famine, for instance, is not merely a ‘test’ for those
directly affected by the calamity; on the contrary, it is also a ‘test’
for those whom God has bestowed with surplus food.
If one were to analyze the events taking place around him, one would
realize the immaculate setup that the All-Wise has created for
comprehensively testing the humankind. This realization would, in turn,
significantly affect one’s behavior and response to the ‘good’ and the
‘bad’ that comes one’s ways. After this realization, one would consider
the ‘good’ that comes his ways, as much a test, as the ‘bad’ that he is
made to face.
Ignoring this fact, man is prone to becoming arrogant, whenever good
comes his ways and to losing all hope, when faced with a difficulty.
This attitude is only the result of ignoring the concept of ‘test’ that
is inherent in all events that happen around us or upon us.
The Qur’an comments on this attitude of man in the following words:
As for man, when his Lord tests him by exalting him and
bestowing favors upon him, he says: ‘My Lord is bountiful to me.’ But
when He tests him restricting his subsistence, he says: ‘My Lord has
humiliated me’. (Al-Fajar 89: 15 - 16)
Thus, as a general principle, an individual, according to the
Qur’an, may be faced with extreme ‘hard times’ for any of the following
reasons:
1. The person faced with the particular situation
is tested with such a situation while others are made to realize the
blessings of God and the privileges that they enjoy in life. Such a
situation normally is to point out to others the great blessings of God
that we tend to take for granted. A normal person suddenly loses his
eyesight and is turned into a blind.
This extra-ordinary event in the life of one person may point out to
others the great blessing of “eyes that see”, which we normally tend to
ignore in our lives and may also help us realize the duties that are
incumbent upon us for enjoying this extra-ordinary privilege in life.
On the other hand, the particular individual faced with such a
situation is tested for his steadfastness and perseverance in the God’s
ways.
Our hardships, normally, fall into this category. The ideal attitude
that we all must aspire to develop is that every time a hardship comes
our way, we should consider it an opportunity of success in our
ultimate life and pray to God to help us succeed in this test.
2. Sometimes God selects a person, on the basis of
His absolute knowledge, to behave as an epitome of gratitude toward God
for all those around him. In such cases, the primary objective of
putting an individual through an extremely severe situation is to teach
others of the correct attitude of thankfulness and gratitude toward
their Lord.
In this situation, others are made to see the individual’s faithful
and thankful behavior toward his Creator in a very severe situation and
thereby realize the importance of the good things God has given them
and also to compare their own behavior with that of the person put in
such a severe situation.
The basic difference between this situation and the one described in
number 1 above is from the particular individual’s perspective that is
taken through such extra-ordinary situation. In number 1, it is
primarily a test for the individual, while in number 2, it is a
privilege for the particular individual that he is selected by God for
the purpose of teaching others of the right attitude and to act as an
example for them. An example of this may be seen in the life of Hadhrat
Ayyub (pbuh) [2].
3. To cleanse an individual of the bad deeds that
he might - knowingly or unknowingly - have committed in the past. If
the person remains steadfast and faithful to his Lord in this cleansing
process, all his bad deeds are washed away in the life of this world,
which guarantees his success in the life hereafter.
4. To punish an individual for his general attitude
of transgression against God in life In such a situation the severe
condition is only a preamble for the real punishment that the person
shall face in the life hereafter.
Guidance is in the hand of Allaah Question: How can we reconcile between the aayahs (interpretation of the meanings):
“Verily, you (O Muhammad) guide not whom you like”
[al-Qasas 28:56] and “And verily, you (O Muhammad) are indeed guiding (mankind) to the Straight Path”[al-Shooraa 42:52]?
Answer:
Praise
be to Allaah.
Allaah
has created man and given him reason, and He has sent down to him Revelation
and sent to him Messengers to call him to the truth and warn him against
falsehood. Then He has left him to make his own choice.
“And
say: ‘The truth is from your Lord.’ Then whosoever wills, let him believe;
and whosoever wills, let him disbelieve
[al-Kahf
18:29 – interpretation of the meaning]
Allaah
commanded His Messenger Muhammad
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) to convey the truth to all
of mankind. Then they have the choice to do as they wish. If a person
obeys, he benefits himself, and if he disobeys, he harms himself, as
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Say:
‘O you mankind! Now truth (i.e. the Qur’aan and Prophet Muhammad), has
come to you from your Lord. So whosoever receives guidance, he does
so for the good of his own self; and whosoever goes astray, he does
so to his own loss; and I am not (set) over you as a Wakeel (disposer
of affairs to oblige you for guidance)’”[Yoonus 10:108]
Islam
is the religion of the natural state of man (fitrah), the religion
of reason and thought. Allaah has distinguished the truth from falsehood.
He has enjoined all that is good and forbidden all that is evil. He
has permitted good things and forbidden evil things. There is no compulsion
in religion because the benefits or harms come back upon the created
being, not upon the Creator. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“There
is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct
from the wrong path. Whoever disbelieves in Taaghoot (false gods) and
believes in Allaah, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold
that will never break”
[al-Baqarah
2:256]
And
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Whosoever
does righteous good deed, it is for (the benefit of) his ownself; and
whosoever does evil, it is against his ownself. And your Lord is not
at all unjust to (His) slaves”[Fussilat 41:46]
Guidance
is in the hand of Allaah. If Allaah willed, He could guide all of mankind,
for there is nothing that He cannot do on this earth or in the heavens.
Nothing happens in His Dominion except that which He wills.
“Say:
‘With Allaah is the perfect proof and argument, (i.e. the Oneness of
Allaah, the sending of His Messengers and His Holy Books, to mankind);
had He so willed, He would indeed have guided you all’”[al-An’aam 6:149
– interpretation of the meaning]
But
in His Wisdom, Allaah has created us with the ability to choose, and
He has sent down to us guidance and the Criterion. So whoever obeys
Allaah and His Messenger will enter Paradise and whoever disobeys Allaah
and His Messenger will enter Hell, as Allaah says (interpretation of
the meaning):
“Verily,
proofs have come to you from your Lord, so whosoever sees, will do so
for (the good of) his ownself, and whosoever blinds himself, will do
so to his own harm, and I (Muhammad) am not a watcher over you”[al-An’aam
6:104]
The
Messenger (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) has no part in guidance; all that he and the
Muslims have to do is to explain and convey the message, and show them
guidance but they cannot force people to follow it, as Allaah said to
His Messenger (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) (interpretation of the meaning):
“And
had your Lord willed, those on earth would have believed, all of them
together. So, will you (O Muhammad) then compel mankind, until they
become believers”[Yoonus 10:99]
And
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And
the duty of the Messenger is only to convey (the Message) plainly”[al-‘Ankaboot
29:18]
Guidance
to the truth is in the hand of Allaah alone and no human being has any
share in that, as Allaah said to His Messenger
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) (interpretation of the meaning):
“Verily,
you (O Muhammad) guide not whom you like, but Allaah guides whom He
wills. And He knows best those who are the guided[al-Qasas 28:56]
Allaah
guides whomsoever He wills and sends astray whomsoever He wills. He
has told us that He guides those who obey Him and turn to Him, as He
says (interpretation of the meaning):
“While
as for those who accept guidance, He increases their guidance and bestows
on them their piety”[Muhammad 47:17]
But
whoever disobeys Allaah and turns away from Him, Allaah will not guide
him, as He says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Truly,
Allaah guides not him who is a liar, and a disbeliever”
[al-Zumar
39:3]
Allaah
is Omniscient and knows what has happened and is happening and what
is yet to come. Allaah knows the believers and the disbelievers, and
what they will do, and He knows what their fate will be in the Hereafter.
He has written all that in al-Lawh al-Mahfooz (the Preserved
Tablet), as He says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And
all things We have recorded in a Book”[al-Naba’ 78:29]
Allaah
has created man with the ability to choose, and He has created him able
to do both, either believer or disbelieve, as He says (interpretation
of the meaning):
“Verily,
We showed him the way, whether he be grateful or ungrateful”[al-Insaan
76:3]
Man
has the choice in terms of his reason only; if he loses his reason by
which he is able to distinguish between the alternatives of good and
evil, truth and falsehood, then he is not accountable. Hence according
to Islamic sharee’ah, the pen is lifted from the insane person (i.e.,
he is not accountable) until he recovers his senses, and from the child
until he reaches the age of understanding, and from the sleeper until
he wakes up. None of these people are accountable until they gain or
recover the reason by which they may distinguish between the alternatives
of faith and disbelief, truth and falsehood, and so on.
Whatever
direction a person takes, there will be reward and punishment, If he
obeys, there will be Paradise:
“Indeed
he succeeds who purifies his ownself (i.e. obeys and performs all that
Allaah ordered, by following the true Faith of Islamic Monotheism and
by doing righteous good deeds”
[al-Shams
91:9 – interpretation of the meaning]
and
if he disobeys, there will be Hell:
“And
indeed he fails who corrupts his ownself (i.e. disobeys what Allaah
has ordered by rejecting the true Faith of Islamic Monotheism or by
following polytheism, or by doing every kind of evil wicked deeds” [al-Shams
91:10 – interpretation of the meaning]
The
choice of one of these two ways is something about which a person will
be questioned by the Lord of the Worlds. Hence it is clear that faith
or disbelief, obedience or disobedience, is the matter of personal choice.
Allaah has made reward and punishment dependent upon this choice:
“Whosoever
does righteous good deed, it is for (the benefit of) his ownself; and
whosoever does evil, it is against his ownself. And your Lord is not
at all unjust to (His) slaves”[Fussilat 41:46]
Whoever
loves Allaah and His Messenger and desires good in this world and in
the Hereafter, let him enter Islam, and whoever turns away from that
and is content with this world and has no interest in the Hereafter
and does not submit, then his abode will be Hell. The individual is
the one who will benefit or harm himself. There is no compulsion to
choose either. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Verily,
this (Verses of the Qur’aan) is an admonition, so whosoever wills, let
him take a Path to his Lord (Allaah)”
[al-Insaan
76:29]
From Usool al-Deen al-Islami by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem al-Tuwayjri

The difference
between punishments and trials Question: Allah menitions in the Quran that when an
evil befalls us it is due to what our own hands have earned. Also our beloved Messenger,
Muhammad (sallalahu 'alayhi wassallam) said in a hadith that the most tried are the
Prophets, then those in piety after those. So therefore in our day to daylife when things
go wrong in our lives how do we decide whether it is due to our sinfulness or that Allah
loves us . and therefore sends a trial upon us Jazakallahu khairun
Answer:
Praise be to Allaah.
Punishments are what happen to people in return for their evil deeds.
Trials are tests which are sent to try people, and people may be tested by good things or
by bad.
Concerning punishments, Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Whatever
of good reaches you, is from Allaah, but whatever of evil befalls you, is from
yourself…” [al-Nisa’ 4:79]
Concerning the phrase “is from yourself”, Qutaadah
said: “[It means] the punishment is for you, O son of Adam, because of your
sin.” Abu Saalih said that “whatever of evil befalls you, is from
yourself” means “because of your sin, and I [Allaah] am the One Who decreed
it for you.” (Tafseer Ibn Katheer).
Allaah also says (interpretation of the meaning): “And whatever
of misfortune befalls you, it is because of what your hands have earned. And He pardons
much.” [al-Shoora 42:30]
Ibn Katheer, may Allaah have mercy on him, said: “[It means]
whatever misfortune happens to you, O people, is because of evil deeds that you have
already done, and ‘He pardons much’ refers to evil deeds – He does
not punish you for them but He pardons them. ‘And if Allaah were to punish men for
that which they earned, he would not leave a moving (living) creature on the surface of
the earth…’ [Faatir 35:45 – interpretation of the meaning].”
Concerning trials, the Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) said: “If Allaah loves a people, He tries them, and whoever has patience
will have patience, and whoever is anxious will be anxious.” (Reported by
Imaam Ahmad; Saheeh al-Jaami’, 1706).
The Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) also said: “The extent of the reward will be in accordance with the extent of
the trial. If Allaah loves a people, He tries them, and whoever is content will have
contentment, and whoever is angry will have anger.” (Reported by al-Tirmidhi,
2320; Saheeh al-Jaami’, 2210).
The following outlines how one may tell whether a given
event is a punishment or a trial:
If the misfortune results from doing an act of obedience to Allaah,
such as being wounded in jihaad, or losing money when migrating for the sake of Allaah, or
losing a job because of becoming Muslim or increasing one’s commitment to Islam, then
this is a trial. Whoever bears it with patience will be rewarded, but if one reacts
angrily then one will earn the wrath of Allaah. If the misfortune results from sin, such
as sexually-transmitted diseases or illnesses caused by drinking alcohol and taking drugs,
and so on, then this is the kind of punishment that comes in this world (as opposed to
being deferred until the Hereafter). If the misfortune is connected neither to a good deed
nor a sin – such as other kinds of disease and sickness, losing a child, or failing
in business – then it depends on the person’s situation. If he is good and
devout, it is a trial, and if he is sinful, it is a punishment.
The misfortune may be a punishment to atone for sins, or it may be a
trial aimed at raising a person’s status and increasing his hasanaat (good
deeds/rewards) – this may be determined by whether a person is obedient or
disobedient. A person should not praise himself, rather he should criticize himself for
his shortcomings and strive to attain perfection. He will benefit from misfortunes in any
case, if he has patience and hopes for reward. And Allaah knows best.
Islam Q&A Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid
http://lexicorient.com/e.o/ill/niqab01.jpg"</a> align="left">Voices on the Veil: Is the Veil Oppressive or a Celebration of Identity?
When the Taliban lost control of Kabul last November, the world
waited for Afghan women to immediately shed their burqas, or
all-encompassing robes. But it didn’t quite happen that way.
Most women in Afghanistan today still cover their heads as they have
done for centuries. And many women across the Islamic world say the
hijab, or traditional headscarf worn with loose clothes, should not be
seen as a sign of women’s oppression, but a statement of their identity
and religion.
Is the hijab just a matter of identity? Or do you think the
underlying reason for the hijab is to restrict a woman’s mobility and
participation in society? Do you think women opt for the hijab to feel
secure? And should they?
The Veil Is Not Oppression, It’s Chic, Say Muslim Women
By Leela Jacinto
March 7 — It was a well-meaning post-Sept. 11 art
project aimed at drawing attention to issues of violence and oppression
in these tumultuous times.
But when Sunita Mehta, co-founder of the New York-based Women for
Afghan Women (WAW), got a phone call from the artist asking for a
burqa, the all-encompassing robe worn by women in Afghanistan, she was
at once suspicious.
“I asked him why he needed a burqa,” says Mehta. And when she heard
that the artist, Robert Galinsky, wanted a male rape victim to take off
a burqa in the course of a multi-media art project in New York City to
symbolize a stripping of layers of captivity, she inwardly groaned.
But the co-founder of the women’s rights group did take the time to
explain to Galinsky just why all this symbolism surrounding the veil
quiet frankly, gave her a headache.
“I told him that as a group we have unanimously decided that we just
don’t want to talk about the burqa. But when it is brought up — usually
by American women — we explain that it is not an issue for Afghan
women. The issue is war, disease, hunger, famine and the Afghan women
in our group do not want to talk about the veil or make it the focus of
our work.”
While women across the world will celebrate International Women’s
Day on Friday with a nod to the achievements made by the women’s
movement and a reminder of the work yet to be done, many Muslim women
in the United States gripe about the excessive attention the media has
been paying to what they call “behind the veil” stories.
What’s even more galling, they say, is that the West just can’t seem to get the picture right.
Waiting for Signs of ‘Liberation’
Last November, when Kabul, the city where she was born, fell from
Taliban control, Homaira Mamoor watched in dismay as newscasters
eagerly waited for Kabuli women to shed their burqas in a sort of
symbolic personal celebration of their socio-political liberation.
“I was frustrated with the Western media’s misconception about the
burqa and women in Afghanistan,” says the 33-year-old WAW member. “They
see it as a symbol of oppression, but the burqa has been part of Afghan
tradition for centuries. And as long as women wear it as a matter of
personal preference, how can you say it’s a symbol of women’s
oppression?”
Oppression was not a word that sprang to mind outside the Islamic
Cultural Center of New York mosque in Manhattan on a recent Friday
shortly before noon prayers. Women sporting a range of headscarves —
from colorful, elaborately draped African veils to austere gray Turkish
scarves — haggled unremittingly with hawkers outside the mosque
peddling veils of every conceivable hue, shape and texture.
“I’ve gone through two fashion phases,” says Lina Omara, a
31-year-old Muslim from Bolivia whose dusky lavender eye-shadow
perfectly matches her smartly draped veil. “I would make my own hijab
[veil] with textiles that I bought from garment stores and would drape
it really long and flowing at the back. These days, I buy hijabs from
stores, but I never use pins. No pins for me,” she says.
For this particular chilly Friday afternoon, Omara, who converted to
Islam a year ago when she married a Muslim, has elected to wear her
hijab low over her forehead and tucked behind her ears in what she
calls her “Tutenkhamen style” after the Egyptian pharaoh.
Veils Across the World
Across the Muslim world, from high-end fashion stores in Dubai to
more economic ones in working-class Cairo, women shop for a range of
Islamic garb from stark black abayas in feather-light chiffon or heavy
cotton, to exquisitely embroidered gallabeyas — or long flowing gowns —
and ornately beaded and sequined hijabs.
The diversity ranges from the gallabeyas and abayas with scarves of
the Arab world to the chador or manteau (coat) and russari (scarf) of
the Persian world to the chuni or wispy fabric accompanying the shalwar
kameez in the Indian subcontinent to an assortment of veils and burqas
worn in Muslim Southeast Asia and Africa.
They all fall under the rubric of the hijab, a term loosely, if not
always accurately, employed to denote loose clothing topped by a
headscarf.
The Islamic imperative for veiling stems from a passage in the Koran
that states: “Say to the believing women that they should lower their
gaze and guard their modesty. They should draw their veils over their
bosoms and not display their ornaments.”
But within Islam, the issue of veiling is a subject for considerable
debate. Some Islamic experts say the text is open to interpretations,
which has accounted for the diversity of veiling traditions across the
Islamic world.
“Although the Koran does call upon women to cover their heads, the
measures change from tradition to tradition,” says Ibrahim Kalin, an
Islamic scholar and fellow at George Washington University. “The burqa
in particular, is part of local traditions in different parts of the
world. While the Koran does not obliterate the need for hijab, Muslim
women have a choice based on their circumstances. But Koranic
injunctions definitely call for modesty in dressing.”
Pushing the Fashion Envelope
But while most Muslim women say the hijab signifies iffa (modesty),
tahara (purity) and taqwa (righteousness), in a globalized world where
tradition and modernity meet at street corners across the globe, hijab
styles seem to be pushing the envelope.
Even while the West watched footage of women in Kabul begging for
bread in shoddy, bulbous burqas during the Taliban years, many veiled
women in Dubai wore Liz Clairborne jeans below their abayas, Egyptian
college girls strolled through Cairo’s Khan Khalili market in
skin-tight jeans and clinging lycra tops with sedate headscarves on,
and Turkish women in Istanbul sported the latest cuts in clothing and
footwear teamed with Gucci look-alike modern silk scarves casually
draped over their heads.
Said Samir, a photographer from Cairo whose wife is not a mohajaba —
the Egyptian slang for a woman who wears the veil — believes the new
hijab chic is not just a meeting of tradition and modernity. He
believes it’s a sign that modern Muslim women want it both ways.
“I think young girls in Cairo with jeans and makeup wear hijab
because they think it’s a better approach to attract husbands,” says
Samir. “This is how it is here. Boys want modern girls who aren’t
“loose.” So the hijab gives out the message that she has traditional
values while the makeup and tight jeans proves her modernity.”
‘American Muslims Are Good Muslims’
But Yumna Malik, a student at Hunter College, New York, who started
wearing the hijab when she was in seventh grade, is dismissive of her
world Muslim sisters’ sartorial displays.
“They don’t understand Islam,” scoffs the 20-year-old biology major.
“I wear hijab because God wants it. Islam calls for modesty and
moderation. I don’t know about other people, but I think American
Muslims are good Muslims because we have so much temptation around us,
that we respect it more.”
While many Muslim women see the hijab as a religious and cultural
bulwark against what they call the excessive sexualization of the
female body by market forces in the West, some women’s scholars say
there are problems on both sides of the East-West divide.
“I think we need to respect women’s choices to don any garb they
want,” says Valentine Moghadam, director of Women’s Studies at Illinois
State University and a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International
Center. “But when donning the hijab by choice, it gets more problematic
because the idea that a woman has to cover her body to protect herself
from men — or that men have to be protected — sends a wrong message. As
wrong a message as women’s bodies being sexualized in the West by the
MTV and Hollywood industry.”
A Contentious Issue
Within the women’s movement, the hijab continues to be a contentious
issue that threatens to split the movement on ideological grounds.
Leftist women’s rights groups in the developing world continue to
condemn the hijab. And last year, when Lt. Col. Martha McSally, the
highest-ranking female fighter pilot in the U.S. Air Force, sued the
Defense Department challenging its regulations making it mandatory for
female military personnel in Saudi Arabia to wear the abaya outside the
base, she was supported by the Washington-based National Coalition of
Women’s Organizations.
In January, in an apparent nod to McSally’s case, the Defense
Department announced that some of the restrictions for female military
personnel in Saudi Arabia had been eased. Military women are now no
longer required to wear the abaya, but are “strongly encouraged” to
wear it. While McSally’s case is still in the courts, some women’s
rights groups say this apparent “victory” in reality means nothing.
The message, when it comes to hijab, might be a complex one, but at
the heart of the issue, experts and ordinary women say, is a matter of
choice.
“There’s a difference if Muslim women choose to wear the hijab or
they are forced to wear it,” says Jean Abinader, managing director of
the Washington-based Arab American Institute. “It’s a matter of
religious freedom and women and men should be allowed to express
themselves.”
And it’s a message Galinsky finally learned after a long phone
conversation with Mehta barely a week before his show goes up in
Manhattan on Friday. In fact, he was so illuminated, that although it
was too late to do away with the burqa in his multi-media ensemble, he
invited WAW to do a write-up on the burqa for the art project and to
distribute literature about the issue at the event.
“All I wanted was to convey the sense that as an American, I too
feel trapped by my government’s decisions,” he says.”But after
listening to them, I felt like a very naïve American. I do feel
enlightened now though, and I realize that the burqa has been very
misrepresented here.”
“Oppression”
“They have to walk 10 steps behind their husband”
“They can’t even work”
Yeah yeah, heard it all before and probably a lot more. What is it
with people thinking Islam treats women as second class citizens? Don’t
tell me, you sometimes wonder that too? Well STOP THERE, because you’ll
be surprised just how many rights women are given in Islam.
Not Convinced ? Read on ! You will soon realise that its not the Spice Girls who introduced ‘Girl Power’ but it was Islam.
Next time you think Islam oppresses women, a woman is worth half a
man and that Islam treats them like second class citizens then never
forget this:
What does Islam give to women? Islam elevated the status of women
1,400 years ago by declaring them equal to men, giving them the right
to work, right to education to the highest level, right to vote, right
to take public office, right to join the army, right to divorce (God
forbid), right to inheritance, right to marry who she wishes (yippie!!)
and so on and so forth, the list is endless….you got all day?
Are Muslim women allowed to work?
There is NO legal provision in either the Qur’an or the Sunnah
(sayings & way of life, of the Prophet ( blessings and peace be
upon him)) which prevents a woman from seeking a career or a job. Women
are permitted to take up such important professions as teaching,
medicine, lawyers, accountants, MP, journalist – just to name a few!
In British and other western countries women don’t even get paid equally for doing the same job as a man!(1)
The money a Muslim woman earns is her own. In the Western world, on
the other hand, any property a woman possessed, belonged exclusively to
her husband. WHAT? It’s true.(2)
So I hope that’s made things crystal clear!
Are Muslim women allowed to seek Education?
You bet they are! Acquiring knowledge in Islam, is a duty binding
both males and females. In a hadith (saying) of the Prophet (Blessing
and peace be upon him) it states: “It is a duty on both men and women
to seek knowledge (religious and secular)”. (Ibn Maajah)
Yet, it was not until the beginning of the 20th Century that Western women were allowed to attend University. Shocking!(3)
So girls, get yourselves down to college/University!
STATUS OF THE MOTHER
Do you want to know something that will make you fall of your seat?
Around that time the child was only recognised to have one parent – the
father! In Islam, however, the status of the mother is so high, that
the Prophet (Pbuh) said – “Jannah ( Paradise) is at the feet of the
Mother”.(Bukhari & Muslim )
POLITICAL RIGHTS
Islam gave women political rights including voting and taking part
in political activities such as sitting in parliament and becoming MPs.
Lets not forget that women only got the right to vote in Britain in the
beginning of the 20th century!
It took three generations for the British woman to win the most
basic rights. Outrageous!Women underwent arrest, humiliation, hunger
strikes, protest marches – JUST TO GET THE RIGHT TO VOTE!
Voting was secured as late as 1918. Society was very hostile towards
women, regarding them as, wait for it – Deviants. Yet Islam gave women
these rights 1400 years ago without them even asking for it!
What rights does a Muslim woman have over her husband?
If there’s one thing that the West believe to be true – is that a
Muslim woman has to walk 10 steps behind her husband, she has no say in
any matter and she’s there to cook, clean and look beautiful for her
‘Purpose in life’ (husband) to appear. YEAH RIGHT!
Just get your head around some of the rights Islam has provided for women and realise what real GIRL POWER is all about:-
Any money she earns or inherits is her own and her husband still has to provide for her….now we’re talking about girl power!
On Marriage, she is entitled to receive a gift, Mahr, (which is usually in the form of money) and this is her own property.
Under Islamic Law a woman cannot be married off without her consent.
She has final approval on a marriage partner and she can refuse and
cancel a marriage arranged without her consent.
She is not required to change her maiden name upon marriage, as Islam recognizes her independent legal personality.
A great number of Jurists, say that the wife is not required to
perform the household chores! ( Malik & Shafi – schools of thought).
Although the Prophet(saw) was such a great leader, he assisted in
the house cleaning and mended his own clothes. SO HUSBANDS DO SOME
HOUSEWORK PLEASE!
It is the husbands duty and full responsibility to provide expenses
for: food, clothing, recreation etc, even if his wife is filthy rich!
Contrary to common belief – in the Islamic law a husband cannot, I repeat cannot, beat his wife or even mistreat his wife.
There is a saying of the Prophet ( Blessings and peace be upon him)
“ ….The best of those are those that are best to their wives”. (Tirmidi)
She also has the right to initiate a separation from marriage if her
rights under marriage are not being granted. SO A WOMAN DOES HAVE THE
RIGHT TO DIVORCE.
Widows have the right to remarry, and they are in fact encouraged to do so.
The Customs of dowry, is a practice which has never been sanctioned by Islam.
I’ve got to stop or I’ll end up writing a book. Believe me this list is endless!
“Why do Muslim women have to cover? This is oppression surely!”
Nowadays, topless and mini skirts are OK but covering yourself is
‘oppression’…. Who you trying to fool? Take a good look around, be
honest – do you think women are being degraded? Yep, so do I.
Women wearing next to nothing selling cars, plastered upon bill
boards, upon magazines, the internet and just about anywhere and
everywhere. Blimey, if that’s not degrading, what is? Islam emphasizes
on modesty. No person should be seen as a sex object. Men also have to
dress modestly.
What are the benefits in covering?
When a woman puts on her hijab, dresses moderately and steps out.
She’s sending out a message LOUD & CLEAR – “Deal with my mind and
not my body”. What will happen:-
Men will stop flirting with you, they’ll start talking to you.
You’ll be taken seriously, because they won’t be looking elsewhere.
There will be no arm around the shoulder or waist, they’ll stand almost a yard apart.
Ask any sister who dresses Islamically, and she’ll tell you, that by
behaving like a Muslimah, she attracts a GREAT AMOUNT OF RESPECT.
BLAME MEN NOT ISLAM
Not Islam, but sadly some Muslim men, do oppress women today. This
is because of their cultural habits or their ignorance about Islam.
So what we find is that Islam gives women wonderful rights and has
done for over 1400 years. Women are by no means seen as second class
citizens in Islam….actually it looks like women have more rights in
Islam than men do!
THE LARGEST GROUP OF CONVERTS TO ISLAM IS WOMEN BETWEEN THE AGES 16 AND 24!(4)
References:
- Equal Opportunities Commission
- Channel 4 History
- ibid
- Muslim converts Association
By Sajid Iqbal
A
month after ex-foreign secretary Jack Straw suggested that Muslim women
who wear veils over their face can make community relations harder,
what do people within the Muslim community in the UK think of his
remarks? Jack Straw’s comments on veils have been good news for the
owner of The Hijab Centre in the MP’s constituency of Blackburn.
Nadeem Siddiqui tells me he is selling more veils than he did before his local MP made his controversial remarks.
Mr Siddiqui is the largest seller of veils in the area.
“I used to sell two or three a week but now I am selling five to
six. They are mainly being bought by young, British-born Muslim women,”
he said.
“These women are experimenting with the wearing of the niqab. Their
mothers often do not cover themselves but they seem to want to do it.”
It is probably not the impact that Mr Straw intended when he wrote
in his local newspapers that he felt uncomfortable when dealing face to
face with veiled women.
Future fears
The majority of Muslims condemned Mr Straw over his comments. One month later, they are still upset.
“I voted for Mr Straw at the last election” says Mr Siddiqui.
“I’m now reconsidering my support for him. Most of the people around
here are doing the same because of what he said about the veil”.
British Muslims do not accept the argument that veiled women contribute to segregation or are a barrier to integration.
Instead they feel they are being deliberately stigmatised as a problem community and are fearful of the future.
The author Na’ima B Roberts has written about her experiences as a veiled woman in her book From My Sister’s Lips.
“I fear that this could change everything in Britain and this country will become like France and ban the veil,” she said.
“The woman who covers her face is the most harmless individual in
society. She doesn’t drink; she doesn’t smoke and does not cause
society any problems.”
Muslim unity
The wearing of the veil has always been a controversial practice and there is no consensus amongst Islamic scholars.
There are roughly two schools of thought, one which says that it is
obligatory and another that believes it is highly recommended but
ultimately a matter of personal choice.
Mr Straw’s intervention and the ensuing political storm have changed all that.
It now appears that British Muslims are less willing to publicly criticise those tiny minority of women who wear it.
A recent statement issued by nearly 30 Islamic groups, including one
of the largest Muslim organisations - the Muslim Council of Britain,
tells Muslims to “remain united, regardless of their differences of
opinion in the wearing of the veil … and to defend the veil with all
their ability”.
It also asks them to “avoid seeking to capitalise on this debate to further political or personal interests”.
This statement has annoyed some Muslims but they are now choosing to remain silent.
They think it is open season on Muslims and do not want to be seen
damaging the community anymore by offering support to the anti-veil
lobby.
Veil encouragement
The case of Aishah Azmi, the Dewsbury teacher who was suspended
after refusing to take her veil off in the classroom, resulted in an
even more ambivalent response from British Muslims.
Even if they disagree with Jack Straw they are unwilling to offer their wholehearted support to Mrs Azmi.
“If I couldn’t wear the niqab and teach then I wouldn’t do that job” says Na’ima B Roberts.
“I don’t go into a line of work where I have to uncover. I wouldn’t,
for example go for the title of Miss Great Britain,” she said.
At the Hijab Centre in Blackburn they recently had a visit from an eight-year-old girl, Mr Siddiqui recalls.
“She wanted to buy a veil and she was arguing with me for 15
minutes. I told her she was too young to be wearing one and in the end
we convinced her to wear the hijab.
“The girl’s mother didn’t even wear a hijab and she told me that she
had spent three days convincing her that she doesn’t need one”.
It seems that rather then discouraging women from wearing the veil
Mr Straw has elevated its importance. We can probably expect to see
more women in veils, not fewer.
By Nasreen Suleaman
Source: BBC News
Thursday, December 28, 2006
The
Attributes and Names
of the Ranks and Stations of the Nafs
in its Striving and Elevation
A
Translation of a Classic Text
by
Mahmoud Mostafa
As
has been made clear to us previously, there are three primary enemies
and causes of destruction and misguidance for humanity:
1.
The desires of the ego (Hawa Al Nafs). Also known as the hidden lust.
This is the first and most dangerous of the enemies for through its
existence the other two enemies exist and without it there is no existence
to the inner enemies of the Nafs. This enemy is inside the very essence
of the human being, i.e. in his nafs, in the left half and is inspired
to transgression (Fujur). It is the opposite of the right side of the
soul that is inspired to consciousness (Taqwah).
The
transgression of the nafs is contained in its desires and its desires
mean its lust for immortality (Me!) and sovereignty (boundless greed
and covetousness). This enemy is the main cause of the self-oppression
of humanity. This oppression leads to either denial and polytheism or
to misguidance, disobedience, and sins. There is no remedy for these
two desires except through constantly reminding the nafs of its mortality
and the certainty of death.
"Verily,
the Nafs commands to harm except for those upon whom my Lord has mercy"
(Yusuf-53)
2.
The desire for the ornaments of the world (Shahwat Al Dunia). This is
the second enemy but it is outside of the human being's essence. It
is the weapon of Iblis that he displays before the lustful eyes of the
ego's desire. Thus he makes it like a mirror that attracts the nafs
and seduces it so that it stirs and moves toward inequity and attachment
to its desires and the love of the material world that leads it to drown
in the world's false and perishing ocean.
The
only remedy for this desire is to become aware and certain of the fleeting
nature of this world and of the necessity of losing one's attachment
to it. It is to know the world for the temporary abode and place of
trial and test that it is. It is to understand that this world is part
of a continuum; before it was the abode of the atom (Dar Al Zhar) and
after it will come other stages that are the world of the Isthmus (Alam
Al Barzakh). The desires of the world are five as explained in the Quran:
"The
love of desires has been made beautiful to people; for women, offspring,
gold and silver, beautiful horses and cattle, and cultivation."
(Al Imran-14)
3.
Satan is the third enemy (Shaytan Al Rajeem). He is also external to
the human being's essence. His role is to seduce, mislead, and make
beautiful all that is false and forbidden and repugnant in this world
in order to cause the nafs to become attached to these things through
its desires. He has no means other than to embellish and tempt the ego
and no weapon except to energize and stir the two inner desires of the
ego, the "Me" and "Greed" so that the human being
will inflate himself and in turn increase his separation. In this way
Satan leads the human being to either denial and polytheism or to disobedience
and sins. There is no remedy or prevention for this other than the constant
remembrance and seeking refuge in Allah and in putting one's trust in
Him.
"Verily,
Satan is your enemy so take him as your enemy." (Fatir-6)
The
ascent or descent of the Nafs depends on the degree of remedy and protection
from these three enemies. So the Nafs either ascends to the station
of "…the most beautiful station." Or it may descend to the
station of "…the lowest of the low."
The
Quran mentions five levels for the human soul. The basic level is the
one in which we are born which is called the Blaming Self (Nafs Al Lawwama).
If it is neglected and left to its whims and desires it will descend
to the station of the Commanding Self (Nafs Al Ammara). And if it is
developed and cared for through effort and resistance to its desires
it will, God willing, ascend to the highest levels of closeness, contentment,
and love for Allah and His Prophet. These higher levels are three, the
first one above the Blaming Self is the Secure Self (Nafs Al Muttma'ina),
followed by the Content Self (Nafs Al Radiyah), and finally to the Gratified
Self (Nafs Al Mardiyyah) and that is the self that reaches its natural
place and station which is "…the most beautiful station."
The
Gnostics (Arifun) have detailed and explained this matter and made it
easy for the Muslim to know it and act upon it thus making immunity
and remedy easy. They made the levels seven in number within the scope
of the five mentioned in the Quran.
1.
The Commanding Self (Nafs Al Ammara).
The
remembrance that is appropriate for its treatment is La Illah Illa Allah
(There is no god except God). It is the lowest level of the self and
the worst. In it is found extreme desire and lust for immortality and
sovereignty. Thus it is attached to the worst of characteristics from
which we have been warned by Allah and His Prophet. For example self-admiration,
arrogance and pride, hardness of the heart, oppression of creatures,
love for exposing the faults of others, lying, gossip, back-biting,
envy, jealousy, criticism, undeserved self-praise, bitterness, attachment
to what belongs to others even if it possesses what is better, lack
of contentment, constant complaining, lack of gratitude, blindness to
its blessings, wishing for increase without effort, extreme selfishness,
greed and covetousness that knows no limit, love of control, and love
of self and its desires, hatred for those who criticize it even if it
is for its own good and love for those who praise it even if it is in
hypocrisy, rejection of advice and counsel, and only talking about itself.
This
Commanding Self is generally divided into two levels:
The
Animal Self (Nafs Al Hayawaniyyah); this is the self that runs after
sensual desires and material possessions without regard for right or
wrong, justice or inequity, lawful or unlawful. It is drowned in the
pleasures of possessions, sex, and adornments. It is characterized by
lewdness, evil, and lack of humanity. It abhors religion and loves itself
selfishly. It knows neither fullness, nor humility, nor thankfulness,
nor honor, nor manners.
The
Satanic Self (Nafs Al Iblissiyyah); is even lower than the Animal Self
because its love for itself has taken it to the stage where it competes
with Allah in His divinity and lordship. "I am your lord supreme…"
as Pharaoh proclaimed, and "I am better than him…" as Iblis
contended.
The
Commanding Self is the one with the ill heart. If the heart is not healed,
the nafs continues in its ways until the heart is blinded and then it
is finally sealed.
The
root of this level of the self is that it's convinced that it is perfect
and that others are flawed and that everyone will die but it will remain
immortal. It got its name because of its constant demands and its numerous
calls to satisfy its desires. So it demands a thing and before it attains
it, it demands another thing and so on without end. The human in this
state is the friend and beloved of Satan and the enemy of the Merciful.
"Except those upon whom Allah shows mercy."
2.
The Blaming Self (Nafs Al Lawwama)
Its
healing remembrance is Allah (God). This is the self in its original
state of birth into the world as Allah says, "By the One who brought
the self to equilibrium inspiring it with its transgression and its
consciousness." (Shams-7:8)
This
is the self that has been touched by Allah's Mercy so that when it commits
a sin or falls into disobedience, it blames itself and turns to forgiveness
and repents to its Sustainer. Then it holds on to obedience until it
slips back into sin then it turns to forgiveness and repentance and
so on.
It
has grasped what the Prophet said, "All humans are prone to sin
and the best sinners are those who repent."
It
is a self that is in constant fluctuation between obedience and disobedience.
One time it is heedless and falls and another it is aware and resists.
This
is the natural station which we start from at birth and from there we
descend or ascend. Its sign is the fluctuation between the characteristics
of the people of this world and the people of the next world. It is
not in the same evil condition as the Commanding Self but the two desires
of immortality and sovereignty are still active in it although in a
much reduced or weakened condition. This is the first stage of salvation
for the self and the first step toward its purification and success.
3.
The Inspired Self (Nafs Al Mulhamah).
Its
remembrance is Hu (The Divine Pronoun HE). This is the self that has
ascended through effort and commitment to its true way from the station
of the Blaming Self to the station of the self that is constantly seeking
forgiveness and repentance regardless of its guilt or innocence. This
is due to its certainty that the root of its attributes is imperfection,
fault, weakness and incompletion.
At
this level the self is inspired with the early stages of love for good
wholesome deeds (Amal Saleh), and for the Quran and Traditions of the
Prophet. It is also inspired with love of remembrance (Zhikr) and to
seeking forgiveness (Istighfar) and to correcting its intentions (Niyyah)
and renewing its repentance (Tawbah).
This
is the last level of danger for the self for it is still vulnerable
to descending to the lower stages of Blame and Commanding. At this stage
the two desires for immortality and sovereignty are dormant except in
passing thoughts.
4.
The Secure Self ((Nafs Al Muttma'ina)
Its
remembrance is Haqq (Truth). It is the self that has ascended to the
first station of development and the ladders of light toward intimacy,
contentment and love for Allah. Its refinement is attained through increasing
commitment and honest and sincere fulfillment of its obligations with
respect to the true way in all its aspects particularly with respect
to human relationships and conduct before acts of worship as the Prophet
said, "The Way (Deen) is in conduct," and, "The best
of you in character is the best in faith."
The
Secure Self has entered the pathways, methods and means of protection
and healing through self-accounting, resistance, striving, and devotion.
These efforts bear the fruit of certainty in the truth that Allah alone
is the Actor. He is the cause and motivator of everything for there
is no god but Him and no Lord but Him. And that Allah in all of his
actions is merciful and generous. He knows the best interests of the
self. This certainty leads to confidence in Allah. It leads to confidence
in His mercy and generosity. The self becomes confident that what is
with Allah is better and more enduring than whatever is in its possession
or in the possession of others. In this way it reaches complete confidence
in its Lord; He is the one who knows what is best for it and He is the
best of Sustainers (Rabb) and the best of Trustees (Wakeel). So the
self becomes secure and ceases to occupy itself with anything other
than what it has reached confidence in, that is its Lord Allah.
The
self in this station expands in its capacity beyond efforts and devotions
toward repentance. Once it is secure with Allah it occupies itself with
additional stations such as hope (Rajaa') and fear (Khawf) and trust
in Him (Tawwakul). In this station the Secure Self is in constant remembrance
of Allah both on the tongue and in the heart.
"Is
it not through remembrance of Allah that hearts become secure?"
(Raad-28)
This
is the first level of completion (Kamal) of the self. The heart begins
to shine with the light of consciousness. The ego's power begins to
shrink so that purity, refinement, clarity, and light dominate the heart
so that it becomes the Secure Self. In this station the desires of immortality
and sovereignty become completely veiled and they are returned to their
true owner who is Allah. Now the self begins to show its true attributes
that were previously hidden; these are the attributes of servanthood
(Ubudiyyah), helplessness ('Ajz), humility (Zhull), poverty (Faqr),
need (Ihtiyaj), and annihilation (Fana').
5.
The Content Self (Nafs Al Radiyah).
"Return
to your Lord content…" (Fajr-28)
Its
remembrance is Hayy (Living). As the Secure Self ascends to its Lord
the lights of the heart increase and fill the entire body transforming
the sensual desires of the ego to the desire for what the Prophet brought
in the Quran and Traditions. Its desires are now solely for these things
and it is totally content with its Lord. Now hardship and ease are the
same to it as are harm and benefit, and withholding and giving because
it has become certain after becoming secure that every action and deed
is from Allah alone; He is its Master, Sovereign, and Creator. He is
the one who grants it Mercy and Compassion. He is the one who is Tender
and Benevolent toward it. Everything that is from its Beloved is accepted
by it and it is content with it. It is content with whatever Allah wishes
to do with it.
At
this level the self's creed is that if it is tried it is patient, and
if it is given it is thankful, and if it is deprived it is accepting,
and if it is wronged it is forgiving. It has now become the self with
a wholesome and sound heart. It fluctuates in all its states between
trust (Tawwakul) and relegation (Tafweed), and contentment (Ridah) and
surrender (Tassleem) to Allah. The characteristic of this self is constant
cheerfulness, gratitude, and thankfulness no matter what happens.
This
is the second stage of the Complete Self (Nafs Al Kamilah), which is
the station of servanthood. By ascending to this level the Content Self
has entered into the first stage of "…the most beautiful station."
This station is connected to the station above it.
6.
The Gratified Self (Nafs Al Mardiyyah).
"Return
to your Lord Content and Gratified." (Fajr-28)
Its
remembrance is Qayyum (Self-Subsistent). At this stage the self is not
only content with its Lord it is also gratified by Him.
"Allah
is content with them and they are content with Him." (Bayyinah-8)
The
Prophet was asked "When shall we attain Allah's contentment with
us?" he replied, "When you are content with your Lord."
At
this stage the light of the heart is completed. The heart advances from
wholesomeness (Qalb Saleem) to a heart that is in total awe (Khashiyah)
of Allah, constantly inclined (Muneeb) toward Him, imbued with modesty
(Hayaa') toward Him in every condition.
"Whoever
is secretly in awe of the Merciful and comes to Him with a sound heart.
Enter it in peace! This is the day of immortality. In it they shall
have whatever they wish, and with Us is more." (Qaf-33:35)
The
folk of this station are the people of witnessing of the manifestations
of the actions of the names of Allah (Mushahadat Tajalliyyat Afa'al
Allah). Their witnessing in their hearts to the manifestations of Allah's
power results in their awe in the face of Allah's greatness and majesty
in all of His actions that are essentially the manifestations of His
names. The folk of this station are also gifted with unveiling and miracles
to enable them to call people to the love of Allah. These miracles are
essentially for those who deny and reject the truth but who are at the
same time called to Allah. So He sends to them miracles through the
folk of this station so that the egos of these people will submit to
these miracles and thus return through Allah back to the path of Allah.
For when Allah loves one of His servants He seeks Him and calls him
to Him. If once called the servant responds then he is brought near
otherwise Allah seeks him through trials, or through miracles. For Allah's
command must come to be and is utterly irresistible.
This
station is the last of the stations of faith (Iman) and through it the
self enters the presence of the station of "…the most beautiful
station" (Ihsan) which is the goal and desire of the heart of every
servant.
7.
The Complete Self (Nafs Al Kamilah).
Also
known as the Self of Light (Nafs Al Nuraniyyah), the Muhammadan Self
(Nafs Al Muhammadiyyah), and the Loving Self (Nafs Al Muhibbah).
"Allah
will bring folk whom He loves and who love Him; they will be humble
towards the faithful and stern toward the deniers. They shall strive
in the way of Allah and will not fear any blame from the blamers. This
is the favor of Allah that He grants whomever He wishes among His servants.
Allah is All-Encompassing and All-Knowing." (Maa'idah-54)
"Then
follow me and Allah will love you and forgive your sins. Allah is the
Forgiving and Merciful." (Al Imran-31)
Its
outer remembrance is Qahhar (Compelling) and its inner remembrance is
Wadud (Loving). This is the station of the completeness of servanthood
to Allah through the completeness of following the teachings of His
beloved, Muhammad, peace be upon him. The one who reaches this station
is blessed with knowing the complete love of Allah for him and for His
Prophet.
This
is the Station of Beauty (Maqam Al Ihsan) and it is above all the stations
of faith that preceded it. In this station the servant has completely
attained the level of "…the most beautiful station." And so
enters into the light of His beloved, the Chosen, in the station of
"Two bow's lengths or nearer." in the footsteps of the beloved,
Muhammad, peace be upon him.
It
is the final level in the stations of the self. This station has no
end to its ascension and refinement. The people of this station have
nothing in their hearts but the love of Allah and His Messenger and
those who are loved by Allah and His Messenger. At this level the Completed
Self becomes the mirror of the light of the essential Prophetic Muhammadan
self so that it attains the complete attributes of love and servanthood.
In this station the self enjoys the lights of manifestation of the Attributes
and Essence of Allah (Tajaliyat Al Siffat wa Al Zhat Al Illahiyyah)
so that it fluctuates in the lights of bliss in all its stations and
states. It is an angelic self of light inside human bodies. The truth
is that it is selfless; it has no choice and if given a choice it would
chose only what Allah loves and is pleased with. If it is asked whether
it is receiving or deprived it would not know because love has overpowered
it and so it is totally unoccupied with causes. It is annihilated through
love (Hubb), fascination (Walah), and passion (Ishq) into the light
of the beauty of the essence of the Lord of causes who is its Beloved
and Protector. The people of this station are the people of Divine Love
and Passion. They are the people who follow the true footsteps of Muhammad.
They
are busy with their love and worship of the Truth and are not distracted
by creation except to fulfill their obligations. And since they have
become a mirror of the Muhammadan light they are constantly in the Prophetic
Presence. All their motions, stillness, words, and deeds are from Allah,
through Him, to Him. All of their hearts follow the Beloved and Elect,
peace be upon him because they have come to know through Allah that
he (the Prophet) is the first beloved, the first light that prostrates,
worships, and serves Him. Whoever of the lovers obeys him, and loves
him, and models his example in character, deeds, and worship, gains
the love of Allah.
The
likes of these folk are the servants of Allah who have been brought
near (Muqarrabun) and have been selected and have gained certainty that
their first obligation, after servanthood, is to love Allah and His
Messenger. This is while keeping the Law, and upholding its tenets.
They are leaders of religious knowledge and they are lights of gnosis
in Truth. Through the lights of their hearts the hearts of those around
them are illuminated, and through their remembrance mercy descends.
They have all they desire and they only desire love of Allah and His
Messenger. They do not seek this world, nor are they occupied by the
next world. All their concern is intimacy with Allah, to hear from Him,
to be near Him for they regard even a moment of separation as torment
greater than Hell.
"Truly,
the God-conscious ones are in gardens and rivers, in a place of truth
in the presence of an Able Sovereign" (Qamar 54:55)
Tuesday, December 26, 2006
An Idiots Guide To The
Prophet Muhammad 
“Mohammed is the guy Muslims worship ?”
No. Muslims do not worship Muhammad (peace be upon him) or any other
prophets. Muslims believe in all prophets including Adam, Noah,
Abraham, David, Solomon, Moses and Jesus. Muslims believe that
Muhammad(pbuh) was the last of the prophets. They believe that God
alone is to be worshipped, not any human being.
“So then... who was he?”
In brief, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was born in Mecca in Arabia in the
year 570 AD. His ancestry goes back to Prophet Ishmael, son of Prophet
Abraham.. His father died before his birth and his mother died when he
was six. He was raised first by a nurse as it was the custom in those
days, and then by his grandfather and uncle.
As a young man, he was known as a righteous person who used to
meditate in a cave. At the age of 40 he was given the first revelation,
when the angel Gabriel appeared in the cave. Subsequently, the
revelations came over 23 years and were eventually compiled in the form
of a book called the Quran.
“Didn't Mohammed write the Quran?”
No. The Quran was revealed to the Prophet (pbuh) through the Angel
Gabriel. It is the record of the exact words revealed by God to the
Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). The revelations were memorised by the Prophet
(pbuh) and then dictated to his companions. The Quran has been
preserved, unchanged, in its original form and confirms the truth in
the Torah, the Psalms and the Gospel. The Quran is also proven
scientifically because it contains hundreds of scientific facts and
statements which have only been discovered in the last 100 years or so.
This clearly proves that the Quran is work of NO man!
“Why do Muslims always bang on about Mohammed?”
The prophet (pbuh) is the most important figure in the lives of
Muslims. Muslims respect him and follow the example he left behind. The
prophet (pbuh) is the person who brought to us the religion we follow.
He taught us the purpose of life, how to live our lives, and how to
treat ourselves and others. He is our role model and we follow his
example, known as “Sunnah”, which is documented in books of “Hadith”.
“Sunnah? Hadith? Is that the latest fashion man or what, like Gucci and Armani?'”
No, it's not. 'Sunnah' is what the Prophet (pbuh) did, said or
approved of. Hadith are recorded traditions relating to the sayings and
doings of the Prophet(pbuh) which are available today in book form in
almost every language.
“But what’s so special about him? What did he do that was so special?”
You see, the Prophet (pbuh) liberated the slaves and protected the
weak. He gave equal rights to women and gave the world the concept of
the equality of mankind. The Prophet (pbuh) was the first human in
history to give universal suffrage (votes to every adult). He gave the
first written constitution to mankind, consisting of 60 articles.
Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was the first person in history to give rights
to prisoners of wars (PoWs). These were revolutionary and historical
actions, which gave rights to each person in every society for all time.
You know why he's so special? Coz he wasn’t only a teacher, preacher
and propagator of moral values but he practised them in his own life as
well. He provided us with moral values, moral behaviour, human values
and etiquette which are practised world-wide to this day. He was a
Prophet, a political leader, a military leader, a judge, a religious
and spiritual leader, a teacher and a perfect personality for all to
follow.
“Ain't the teachings of Mohammed out of date? Come on man, 1400 years is ancient!”
When you study his life you get practical guidance and an ideal role
model on how to act as a husband, father, brother, neighbour, teacher,
ruler, reformer, judge and as a human being... I would say very up to
date! Anybody and everybody can get light from following the lifestyle
of the holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).
The Prophet (pbuh) gives clear teachings to resolve modern day
problems such as racism, tribalism, sectarianism, hunger, homelessness,
poverty, teenage pregnancies, single parent families, rape. child
abuse, drugs and alcohol abuse, world peace, environmental health and
many more. So NO, the teachings of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) are
definitely relevant today and most certainly NOT out of date.
“Didn't Mohammed hate non Muslims?”
He acted with mercy and compassion even to those who came to attack
him. Many attempts were made to kill the Prophet (pbuh). His followers
and supporters were tortured and killed. He and his supporters had
sanctions put on them and were boycotted by the rest of Mecca. He had
animal excrement thrown on him whilst in prayer. He was stoned by
children in Mecca and was badly injured. He went through many periods
of bitter starvation. He had to leave his homeland and migrate to
Medina to escape the persecutions in Mecca. The Prophet was called a
madman and ridiculed. BUT HE NEVER INSULTED ANYONE. HE NEVER SHOWED
HATE TOWARDS ANY OF HIS ENEMIES. HE SIMPLY FORGAVE THEM AND HE OFFERED
THEM LOVE AND COMPASSION.
“Didn't Mohammed hate Christians and Jews?”
Again, he taught the exact opposite. Islam tells us that Jews and
Christians are "people of the Book". By the book it means those that
also received divine scriptures. Muslims are told to treat them with
respect and justice and not to fight with them. Let's look at the
classic example from the life of the Prophet (pbuh):
Once a group of Christian priests were in Medina. They needed a
place to stay so they went to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). He said you can
stay at my house. He cooked them dinner and made them welcome. Soon it
was the time for the Christians to pray, the Prophet (pbuh) took them
to the Mosque of the Prophet and said you can do your worship here.
“Didn't Mohammed teach violence and terrorism?”
Now that's a joke. He taught the absolute opposite of this. Just listen to some of his teachings:
"The faithful is he in whom people place their confidence about their property and life'. (Tirmizi)
"A perfect Muslim is one from whose tongue and hands mankind is safe.'
'It is unworthy of a Muslim to injure people's reputations:
and it is unworthy to curse any one: and it is unworthy to abuse any
one: and it is unworthy of a Muslim to talk arrogantly.'
Faith is a restraint against all violence, let no Muslim commit violence.'
The Prophet Muhammad was asked;
<>'what actions are most excellent in Islam?' He replied: 'To
gladden the heart of a human being, to feed the hungry, to help the
afflicted, to lighten the sorrow of the sorrowful, and to remove the
wrongs of the injured.'
Some people asked Allah's messenger : 'who is a very good Muslim?'
He replied: ' one who avoids harming the people with his tongue and
hands.' 'A believer remains within the scope of his religion as long as
he doesn't kill another person illegally.'
Now does that sound like a man of violence and terrorism or a great
man of peace? Terrorism goes against every principle in Islam. If a
Muslim engages in terrorism he is not following Islam and is
contradicting the teachings of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). They may be
using the name of Islam for political or financial gain.
“I ain't heard no big non-Muslim 'big up' Mohammed?”
Michael H Hart in 'The 100: A Ranking of the most influential
Persons in History' (New York: Hart Publishing Company, Inc. 1978):
'My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world's most
influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by
others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful
on both the religious and secular level.'
Lamartine, a French historian writes in his book, History of Turkey, p. 276:
'…Philosopher, orator, apostle, legislator, warrior,
conqueror of ideas, restorer of rational beliefs, of a cult without
images; the founder of twenty terrestrial empires and of one spiritual
empire, that is Muhammad. As regards all standards by which human
greatness may be measured, we may well ask, is there any man greater
than he'?
Mahatma Ghandi
'When I closed the second volume (of the Prophets
biography) I was sorry that there was not more for me to read of a
great life.'
George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950)
I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion
far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Saviour of
Humanity."
“If Mohammed was really a top Prophet and that... then why don't Christians, Jews and others mention him in their books?”
Well.... actually they do. The Prophet (pbuh) is mentioned in Hindu
scriptures, Buddhist scriptures, Torah and the Bible.(See The Revival
website for further details)
“Did Prophet Mohammed perform miracles like Prophet Jesus did?”
Yes he did. He performed hundreds of miracles which was one of the
proofs that he was a true Prophet of God. (See The Revival website for
further details)
“Why did Muslims make a big deal of some stupid cartoons?”
Muslims see the Prophet (pbuh) as a role model and follow his every
teaching. The cartoons insulted the prophet and portrayed him as a
terrorist. So obviously Muslims were upset and angry. But it should be
crystal clear that those Muslims who protested with violence, shooting,
killing, hijacking and threatening to kill others have totally
contradicted the exact teachings of the prophet they were protesting
for.
By http://www.therevival.co.uk/magazine/june2006/idiots_guide_to_prophet_saw.php
The prophet Muhammad Pattern of
Communication Toward Women
By: Ali Zohery
Islam
came at a time when women all over the world were being oppressed and
exploited.
The
most any society would accord the woman was to admit that she was part of the
human race. They never admitted her dignity or gave her rights and
responsibilities equal to those of men. The Greeks considered her to be an
object of pleasure and amusement. This view was articulated in the text of
Deemo Stayn:
He said: “We take prostitutes for pleasure, lovers to care for our daily
health, and wives to give us legitimate children.”
The Romans gave the father and husband the right to sell her to whomever they
pleased.
The Arabs gave the son the right to inherit the wife of his father (not his own
mother) just like he would inherit his father’s wealth and his steed! That is
if she were lucky enough not to have been buried alive at birth.
This was the case with the rest of the world’s societies, like the Persians and
the Hindus.
Women remained in this horrible state without protesting or rebelling against
it. No one else was to do so either. Nor were there any social or economic
developments that would require a betterment of her status.
Then Prophet Muhammad came, proclaiming her rights and her equality with men.
He established for her all of her rights to bring her out of the
miserable state that she was in and elevate her to the noble status that she
deserves.
In
Islam there is absolutely no difference between men and women as far as their
relationship to God is concerned, as both are promised the same reward for good
conduct and the same punishment for evil conduct. The Qur'an says:
And
for women are rights over men similar to those of men over women. (2:226)
The
Qur'an, in addressing the believers, often uses the expression,'believing men
and women' to emphasize the equality of men and women in regard to their
respective duties, rights, virtues and merits. It says:
For
Muslim men and women, for believing men and women, for devout men and women,
for true men and women, for men and women who are patient and constant, for men
and women who humble themselves, for men and women who give in charity, for men
and women who fast, for men and women who guard their chastity, and for men and
women who engage much in God's praise, for them has God prepared forgiveness
and great reward. (33:35)
This
clearly contradicts the assertion of some the Christian Fathers that women do
not possess souls and that they will exist as sexless beings in the next life.
The Qur'an says that women have souls in exactly the same way as men and will
enter Paradise if they do good :
Enter into Paradise,
you and your wives, with delight. (43:70) Who so does that which is right, and
believes, whether male
or female, him or her
will We quicken to happy life. (16:97) (Abdur Rahman,Women in the Qur'an and
the
Sunnah -Ahmadu Bello
University, Zaire.)
Research Questions:
How Does Islam Elevate The Status Of Women?
Why The Western Media Has Negative Stereotypes Of Muslim Women?
Why Are SO Many Women Converting To Islam?
Significance
of the Study
The
religion of Islam is misunderstood in the western world. The Muslim Women
images in the west are stereotyped with backwardness and being oppressed
by men. Understanding the Religion of Islam would correct the wrong ideas and
introduce the religion of Islam with its valuable values and principles to the
non-Muslims. The values of Islam, if applied, would be a public, private policy
and a way of life. The western media show the Muslim women in a negative image.
This study is to introduce the real status of the Muslim women from the two
main sources of Islam: The Quran and the tradition of the prophet Muhammad.
Theoretical Framework:
Stereotypes Theory
(Infante
at all, 1997) define Stereotypes that they are are mental categories shared by
group members about other groups based on learned opinions rather than
information about a specific individual.
Ford
and Stangor (1992) tested the hypotheses that when forming stereotypes of
social groups, the attribute dimensions which are most differentiated will most
likely become stereotypical. They suggest that stereotypes may be best viewed
as the characteristics that are most strongly associated with a group in
memory. Therefore, stereotypes of a group are the attributes that are most
likely to come to mind when thinking about a particular group.
(http://www.student.richmond.edu/~sjohnso2/stereotypes.html)
In
the past, when so many attacks were launched against Islam under an open and
unabashed crusader flag, various popes used to encourage some fanatics to write
booklets containing lies against Islam, distorting the message and reviling the
religion. Many of the strongest stereotypes are from this era.
After
the church withdrew from this activity, the number of these attacks was
obviously reduced. Yet they did not stop altogether. They took another form
under a different banner, the pretext of freedom of expression. Only the approach
has changed. It is a fact that Islam receives a most Hostile media coverage. It
is not difficult to see that Muslim's are being stereotyped as a threat to the
"New World Order". (About Al-Islam and Muslims v1.9)
Literature
Review, interpretation and analysis:
During
the time of the Prophet, Islam diminished the excessive practices of Jahiliyyah
by imposing new laws using the principle of gradualism. Islam granted women
their dignity and allowed them to claim equal rights with men in all spheres of
life. The Qur'an teaches Muslims that God created both men and women from the
same soul:
“O mankind! reverence
Your Guardian-Lord, Who created you From a single Person, Created, of like
nature, His mate, and from them twain Scattered (like seeds) Countless men and
women.”
In
the period of nascent Islam, women played prominent roles in all realms of
life: religious, political, educational, legal, moral, economic, and
military. A few examples will show what Islam accomplished in raising the
educational level of women and will highlight Muslim women's contributions to
the growth of knowledge in Islamic society.
The
Prophet gradually but persistently allowed women to assume important positions
in society. He designated his wife A'isha as a religious authority by stating
"take half of your religion from this ruddy-complexioned
woman." Through the Prophet's encouragement, A'isha played a visible
and active role in the political, legal, and scholastic activities of the
Muslim community. The Prophet chose her as one of the people who would
pass on knowledge of the Qur'an and his practices to later generations of
Muslims. A'isha herself taught famous scholars about the Qur'an and
Hadith. In addition, she narrated 2,210 Hadith of the Prophet, and scholars
have noted that one-fourth of the norms of Shari'ah law were also narrated by
her. 70 In
almost every respect, A'isha appears to have been not only one of the
Companions of the Prophet, but also an exceptional person.
Other
women played prominent roles in the growth and enrichment of Islamic
civilization. Imam Nawawi stated that Umm al-Mu'minin Hafsa "was one of
the intellectual and intelligent persons." He also spoke about the
mother of Anas, Umm Sulaim, as one of the learned and knowledgeable Companions
of the Prophet. Imam Nawawi expressed a similar opinion about Umm Atiyah,
saying "[s]he is reckoned among those of the Companions who won excellence
and honor and participated in jihad with the Prophet." Imam Bukhari
stated that "Umm Darda' sat in Tashahud [as a witness] as a man sits and
was a jurist (therefore her actions are authoritative)."
Islam
did not prevent women from participating in armed revolutionary resistance or
legal decision-making. Zaynab, Ali's daughter, was a revolutionary, and
Umm Atiyah, Hafsa, Asma' bint Abi Bakr, and Sahla bint Suhail were all
jurists. Women also participated in the bay'ah and, thus, were an integral
part of the political process. In fact, through the bay'ah, they contributed
later on to the election of the third khalifah. In short, women were
equal participants in the growth of the early Islamic state.
The
well-known saying of Omar Ibn al-Khattab, the second Rightly-Guided khalifah,
demonstrated the change in the status of women which had occurred with the
advent of Islam: "By God, we did not pay attention to women in jahiliyyah
until God said about them in the Qur'an what is said, and gave them their share
in matters." (Leila P. Sayeh And Adriaen M. Morse Jr, An Incomplete
Understanding Of Gradualism Islam And The Treatment Of Women, 30 Texas
International Law Journal 311)
when prophet Muhammad died after twenty three
years Islam only spread in Arabia. This religion of Islam was basically spread
by four or five individuals who had the most in teaching. One of them was the
prophet's wife `Aa’isha. She is among the most to have narrated his statements
and likewise she is amongst the three, four, five who have mostly given
religious pronouncements, who have given religious verdicts, explained what
these verses in the Quraan meant or what the words of the prophet meant.
Look
at any other civilization in the history of humanity, you will not find a women
playing a role in its establishment where it can be attributed to her efforts
for its establishment. The Greeks - look at the philosophers Plato, Aristotle
and others - all were men. The early church fathers writings were basically men
and until today the idea of women scholarship is limited in some areas of the
church. The French writers at the French revolution and Voltaire and the
Russians were men. The founding fathers of the United States were men, and also
other civilizations are basically based upon men. Islam is the only
civilization which is known by humanity where a leading input in terms of its
transmission and establishment was based upon the efforts of women. (Ali
Al-Timimi, Elevation of Women's Status)
Equality Between Men and Women in Islam:
Islam establishes the principle of equality between men and women in all
aspects of life that they are equal in, because both of them are equally human.
It distinguishes between them in some areas, taking into consideration the
natural differences between them and the special qualities that each of them
has.
The areas of equality are as follows:
1. Equality in their human origins:
Islam conclusively establishes that all human beings have a common origin. This
fact is mentioned in many verses of the Qur’ân:
“O
Mankind, fear your Lord who created you from a single soul and created from it
its mate and brought forth from the two of them many men and women.”
“O
Mankind, verily we created you from a male and a female and made you into
nations and tribes so you may know one another. Verily the most honorable of
you with Allah are the most righteous.”
2.
Equality in their destiny:
Islam also establishes that all of mankind is going to return to Allah who
created them, and everyone – male and female – is going to be recompensed for
his or her worldly deeds. They will receive well if they did good and they will
be requited with evil if they did evil. Allah says:
“And
every one of you will come to Him alone on the Day of Resurrection.”
Allah
says:
“A
human being will have nothing except for what he does. And his deeds will be
seen. Then he will be recompensed fully.”
Allah
says:
“So
their Lord accepted of them their supplication and answered them: ‘I will never
allow the work of any of you to be lost, male or female. You are from each
other.”
Allah
says:
“Whoever
works righteousness as a believer, whether male or female, we will truly give a
good life and We shall pay them a reward in proportion to the best of what they
used to do.”
According
to the Qur'an, men and women are equal before God; women are not blamed for
violating the "forbidden tree," nor is their suffering in pregnancy
and childbirth a punishment for that act. Islam sees a woman,
whether
single or married, as an individual in her own right, with the right to own and
dispose of her property and earnings. A marital gift is given by the groom to
the bride for her own personal use, and she may keep her own family name rather
than adopting her husband's.
Roles
of men and women are complementary and collaborative. Rights and
responsibilities of both sexes are equitable and balanced in their totality.
In
his Farewell sermon, the Prophet Muhammad declared: "O People it is true
that you have certain rights with regard to your women but they also have
rights over you.
Remember
that you have taken them as your wives only under Allah's trust and with His
permission. If they abide by your right then to them belongs the right to be
fed and
clothed
in kindness. Do treat your women well and be kind to them for they are your
partners and committed helpers. And it is your right that they do not make
friends with any one of whom you do not approve, as well never to be
unchaste."
The
best declaration for women’s rights is spelled out in the farewell speech of
the prophet. He demanded that husbands should treat their wives with kindness
and gentleness. Men are to know that their women are their partners. Islam
recognizes the duties
and
responsibilities of both partners and, hence, emphasizes that man is the HEAD,
while the woman is the HEART of the family. Both are needed and both are
complementary to one
another.
The rights and duties of each spouse toward the other were declared and
explained. (Sakr,1998, p. 26)
Woman enjoys certain
privileges of which man is deprived.
She is exempt from some religious duties,
i.e., prayers and fasting, in her regular periods and at times of confinement.
She is
exempt from all
financial liabilities. As a mother, she enjoys more recognition and higher
honor in the sight of
God (31:14-15;46:15). The Prophet acknowledged this honor when he declared that
Paradise is under the
feet of the mothers.
She is entitled to
three-fourths of the son's love and kindness with one-fourth left for
their father. As a
wife she is entitled to demand of her prospective husband a suitable dowry that
will be her own. She is entitled to
complete provision and
total maintenance by the husband. She does not have to work or share with her
husband the family
expenses. She is free
to retain, after marriage, whatever she possessed before it, and the husband
has no right whatsoever to any of her
belongings. As a
daughter or sister she is entitled to security and provision by the
father and brother
respectively. That is her privilege. If she wishes to work or be
self-supporting and
articipate in handling
the family responsibilities, she is quite free to do so,
provided her integrity
and honor are safeguarded.( Hammuda Abdul-Ati, The Status of Woman in Islam
from "Islam in focus")
Why
are so many Women converting to Islam ?
At
a time when Islam is faced with hostile media coverage particularly where the
status of women in Islam is concerned, it may be quite surprising to learn that
the majority of converts to Islam are WOMEN
According
to "The Almanac Book of Facts", the population increased 137% within
the past decade, Christianity increased 46%, while Islam increased 235%. In a
recent poll in the (US), 100,000 people
per
year in America alone, are converting to Islam. For every 1 male convert to
Islam, 4 females convert to Islam, Why?
1. The Bible
Convicts Women as the originalSinners, (ie. Eve picking from the forbidden
tree){Genesis 2:4-3:24}. The Koran Clarifies it was Adam Not Eve {Qur'an
7:19-25}
2. The
Bible says "The Birth of a Daughter is a loss" {Ecclesiasticus 22:3}.
The Qur'an says both are an Equal Blessing { Qur'an 42:49}
3.
The Bible Forbids Women from Speaking in church {I Corinthians 14:34-35}. The
Qur'an says Women Can argue with the Prophet {58:1}
4. In the Bible, divorced
Women are Labeled as an Adulteress, while men are not {Matthew 5:31-32}. The
Koran does Not have Biblical double standards
{ Qur'an 30:21}
5. In The Bible, Widows and
Sisters do Not Inherit Any Property or Wealth, Only men do{Numbers 27:1-11}The
Koran Abolished this male greediness { Qur'an 4:22} and God Protects All.
6.
The Bible Allows Multiple Wives{I Kings 11:3} In The Koran, God limits the
number to 4 only under certain situations (with the Wife's
permission)and Prefers you Marry Only One Wife{ Qur'an 4:3} The Koran gives the
Woman the Right to Choose who to Marry.
7.
"If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and
rapes her and they are discovered, he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels
of silver. He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never
divorce her as long as he lives" {Deuteronomy 22:28-30} One must ask a
simple question here, who is really punished, the man who raped the woman or
the woman who was raped? According to the Bible, you have to spend the Rest of
Your Life with the man who Raped You. The Prophet Muhammad Says {Volume 9, Book
86, Number 101} Narrated by Aisha:" It is essential to have the consent of
a virgin (for the marriage)".
9.
Women were given rights to Vote less than a 100 years ago in the (US), while
the Quran (42:38) gave Women Voting rights almost 1,500 years ago.
10.
Islam has unconfined Women and has given them the human right to reach for the
sky. There have been Muslim Women Presidents through out the centuries, The
Muslim countries have voted for and elected Female Presidents. (Mohamed Ghounem
& Abdur Rahman, Why are so many Women converting to Islam ?)
Conclusion
Islam
has immensely improved the status of women compared to the Judaeo-Christian
tradition. The Quran has offered women dignity, justice, and protection which
,for long, have remained out of their reach. That's why it is no surprise to
find that most converts to Islam, today, in a country like Britain are women.
In the U.S. women converts to Islam outnumber men converts 4 to 1. The problem
is that the majority of the population in the West do not know these facts.
They easily believe the media's distorted image of Islam. What the Quran has
given to women is unparalleled in the history of religion. ( Sherif Muhammad,
February 10, 1995, Women in Islam Versus Women in The Judaeo-Christian
Tradition:The Myth & The RealityFriday khutbah). Today people think
that women are liberated in the West and that the Women’s liberation movement
began in the 20th century. Actually, the women’s liberation movement
was not begun by women but was revealed by God to The Prophet Muhammad in
the seventh century. The Qur’an and the Traditions of the Prophet (Hadith or
Sunnah) are the sources from which every Muslim woman derives her rights and
duties.( Mary Ali & Anjum Ali, Women's Liberation Through Islam)
References:
1. Holly Qur’an
2. Akbar, M. U. (1991).
The orations of Muhammad the Prophet of Islam. New Delhi: Kitab Bhavan.
3. Ali Al-Timimi,
Elevation of Women's Status
4. Baran, S. J. &
Davis, D. K. (2000) Mass Communication Theory, Wadsworth, p. 236
5. Besant, A.
(1932). The Life And Teachings Of Muhammad, Madras, P. 4.
6. Denzin, N. K
& Lincolin, Y. S. (2000) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage
Publications, inc., Thousand Oaks
7. Encyclopedia
Britannica: (Vol. 12)
8. Faizi, S. F. H.
(1997). Sermons of the prophet. New Delhi, Kitab Bhavan
9. Gibbon, E. And Ockley,
S. (1870). History Of The Saracen Empires, London, P. 54
10.
Glubb, J. B. (1991). The life and Times of Muhammad. Chelsea,
MI: Scarborough House.
11.
Hammuda Abdul-Ati, The Status of Woman in Islam from "Islam
in focus
12.
Infante at all, 1997,
Building Communication Theory, waveland press
13.
Mohamed Ghounem & Abdur Rahman, Why are so many Women
converting to Islam ?)
14.
Sayeh, Leila P. And Morse, Adriaen M. Jr.,
Islam And The Treatment Of Women: An Incomplete Understanding Of Gradualism, 30
Texas International Law Journal 311
15.
Sherif Muhammad, February 10, 1995, Women in Islam Versus
Women in The Judaeo-Christian Tradition:The Myth & The RealityFriday
khutbah)
The
manifestation of forbearance in the life of the Prophet By: Ali Zohery
The manifestations of this forbearance in the life of the
Prophet, were very numerous, the followings are examples:
1.
After the Prophet defeated the Banu’l-Mustaliq, some of the Ansar and
Muhajirun quarreled and ‘Abdullah ibn Ubayayy al-Khazraji said “The Muhajirum
have constricted us and crowded us in our own land. By Allah, when we return to
Madina, the stronger will expel the baser from it!”
The Prophet heard those words. ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab was
with him and said: “Command ‘Ubbad ibn Bishr to kill him!” The Prophet said
“Umar, how will it be when people say that Muhammad kills his companion? No,
announce that we are leaving.”
That was at a time when the Prophet did not normally
travel. The people set out and while they were travelling, Usayd ibn Hudayr
asked him, “Prophet of Allah, by Allah, you are returning at an early hour when
you do not normally travel.” The Messenger said to him, “ Have you heard what
your companion said?” He said, ‘ Which companion?” He said, ‘”Abdullah ibn
Ubayy.” He asked, “And what did he say?” He replied “He stated that when he
returns to Madina the stronger will expel the baser from it.” Usayd said,” So
you, Messenger of Allah, be kind to him. By Allah, when Allah brought you to us
his people were preparing to crown him. He thinks that you have wrested a
kingdom from him.”
Then the Prophet traveled with the people until evening,
then through the night until morning, and then through the beginning of the day
until the sun was too hot for them. Then he camped with them and as soon as
they touched the ground, they fell asleep. He did that to distract them from
what had happened the previous day.
Then the son of ‘ Abdullah ibn Ubayy presented himself
to the Prophet and said that if his father must be killed, then his son should
be the one to kill him. The Prophet said, “ No, we will be kind to him and be a
good companion to him as long as he remains with us.”
Here the Messenger was in a situation where a person
would normally be very angry; he was also in a position to punish ‘Abdullah ibn
Ubayy for the sedition which he was inciting. But he showed forbearance to him
and refused to allow him to be killed, refused to threaten him with expulsion
from Madina, refused to allow his son to kill him and, on top of all this,
promised to be kind to him and be a good companion to him. This is a wonderful
example of forbearance.
2.
Wahshi, the client of Jubayr ibn Mut’im killed Hamza ibn
‘Abdu’l-Muttalib in the Battle of Uhud. When the Prophet conquered Makka,
Wahshi fled to Ta’if. When the delegation of Ta’if went to the Prophet to
submit, all avenues were closed to him.
Wahshi said, “ I said, ‘ I will go to Syria, Yemen or
some other land.’ By Allah, I was in that state of anxiety when a man said to
me, ‘ Woe to you! By Allah, he does not kill anyone who enters his religion and
bears witness.’ When he told me that, I went out to the Messenger of Allah
without fear of him until I was standing face to face with him and then gave
the testimony of truth. When he saw me, he said, ‘ Is it Wahshi?’ I said, ‘
Yes, Messenger of Allah.’ He said, ‘ Sit down and tell me how you killed
Hamza.’
When I finished telling him, he said,’ Bother you! Remove your face from me. I
do not want to see you.’ So I used to avoid the Messenger of Allah wherever he
was so that he would not see me, until Allah Almighty took him.”
What unique restraint of rage! What immense forbearance
the Messenger of Allah showed. He met the killer of his noble uncle, his friend
comrade in jihad, and his brother by suckling! He was angry with his killer and
able to take revenge on him, even if he had been strong and free, let alone a
slave who had been freed by his master after killing Hamza and so without
helper or protector.
3.
A Bedouin came to the Messenger to ask him for something. He gave him
something and then asked him, “ Have I been generous to you?” The Bedouin said,
“ No, and you have not behaved well.” The Muslims became angry and made for
him, but he, indicated to them to hold back.
Then he went inside his house, sent for the Bedouin, and
gave him more. Then he asked the man, “ Have I been good to you?” “Yes, may
Allah repay you well from your family and tribe,” he replied. Then the Prophet
said to him, “ you said what you said and that had an effect on my Companions.
If you like, you can say what you have just said in front of them so that it
will remove what they feel in their hearts against you.” The Bedouin agreed.
Next morning or evening he came and the Prophet, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “ This is the Bedouin who said what
he said. We gave him more and now he states that he is pleased. Is that the
case?” The Bedouin said, “ Yes, may Allah repay you well from your family and
tribe.”
The Messenger “ I and this Bedouin are like a man who has
a she-camel which bolts from him. People pursue it, but they only make it in
shy away more. Then the owner of the camel cries out to them, ‘Leave me with my
camel! I am kinder to it and know it better.’ So he goes to it from in front
and takes some sweepings from the earth and slowly drives it back, until it
comes and kneels and he puts his saddle on it and gets up on it.”
Can you see how the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless
him and grant him peace, was forbearing to this man he gave to in spite of the
fact he was ungrateful for what he had already been given? Do you see how he
gave to him a second time and then heard his pleasure and supplication? Do you
see how he removed the anger of his companions towards this Bedouin so that
none of them would punish him for his incivility and ingratitude?
4.
A young man came to the Prophet, and said, “ Prophet of Allah, will you
give me permission to commit fornication?” The people shouted at him and the
Prophet said, “ Bring him near. Approach.” He came up and sat in front of him.
The Prophet said to him, “ Would like your mother to do it?” The young man
said,” No, may Allah make me your ransom!” The Prophet said, “ So people do
not like it for their mothers. Would you like it for your daughter?” The young
man said,” No, may Allah make me your ransom!” The Prophet said,” So people do
not like it for their daughters. Would you like it for your sister?” and he
went on to mention his aunts. Every time the man said,” No, may Allah make me
you ransom!” and the Prophet would say, “ So people do not like it.”
Then the Prophet put his hand on the breast of the young
man and said, “ O Allah, purify his heart and forgive his sin and protect his
private parts. Make nothing more hateful to him than fornication.”
Here the wisdom of the great teacher is very clear. He
did not rebuke the young man or confront him with his foolishness but was kind
to him and began to make examples for him so that he would see the ugliness and
atrocity of what he proposed. Then he added to that the kindness of a loving
father and prayed for the young man to be healed of his disease from which he
had thought there was no release or cure.
5.
At the Battle of Uhud, his Companions asked him to curse the idolaters
who had wounded his face and broken his tooth so that the blood flowed down his
face. He said, “ I was not sent as a curser. I was sent as a summoner and a
mercy. O Allah, forgive my people. They do not know.”
That day was critical: the Muslims were not victorious
and many of their great men were killed and wounded. Even the Prophet himself
not preserved from injury. But even so, he would not call on Allah to destroy
his people, since he was steadfast and forbearing. He continued to have great
hope that their senses would return to them and they would be guided to the
religion of Allah.
6.
Anas narrated: “ One day I was walking with the Messenger of Allah, when
a badouin caught up with him and pulled him violently. The Prophet was wearing
a Najrani cloak with a thick border and I saw that the neck of the Messenger of
Allah had a mark from the edge of the cloak owing to the strength of the man’s
tugging.
“ The Bedouin said, “ Muhammad! Load up these two camels
of mine with some of the property of Allah which is in your possession. You
will not let me load up from your property nor your father’s property.’ The
Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, was silent and then said, ‘
The property is the property of Allah and I am His slave.’ Then he said, ‘
Shall retaliation be taken from you, Bedouin, for what you did to me?’ The
Bedouin said, ‘ No.’ the Messenger said, ‘ Why not?’ The Bedouin said, ‘
Because you never repay evil with evil.’ The Messenger of Allah, laughed and
then commanded that the Bedouin have one camel loaded with barley and another
with dates.”
The Prophet was forbearing to that Bedouin who was rude
to him, spoke insolently to him, and used inbefitting coarseness. Then he gave
him what he wanted and probably more than he wanted.
7.
Before he was a Muslim, Zayd ibn Sa’na came to demand that the Prophet
repay a loan to him. He pulled his garment from his shoulder, seized hold of
him and behaved coarsely towards him. ‘ Umar chased him off and spoke harshly
to him while the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, merely
smiled. He said, “ I expect something other than this from you, ‘ Umar. You
should command me to repay the man well and command him to ask for his debt
correctly.” Then he said, “ Three days are left till it is due.” He told ‘Umar
to repay him what was owed and to add twenty sa’s because he had alarmed him.
This was the cause through which Zayd became Muslim.
8.
The Messenger of Allah made a division of goods and one of the Muslim
Bedouins said: “ This is a division by which the Face of Allah is not
intended.”
When the Prophet, Messenger of Allah was told that, his
cheeks became red and he said, “ May Allah have mercy on Musa! He suffered more
abuse than this and remained patient.”
The prophet became angry as is proper, because his anger,
as Ali ibn Abi Talib said, was not for this world’s sake. He was angry for the
sake of the truth and nothing could withstand his anger until the Truth had
been vindicated. It is as Aisha (a wife of the prophet) said: the Prophet never
took revenge for himself unless the honor of Allah was violated. Then he took
revenge for the sake of Allah.” Even the anger of the Messenger never
transgressed the limits of fairness in any instance.
Above just a few examples of forbearance characteristic
of the Prophet.
Conclusion
In his political leadership communication, the Prophet demonstrated
extreme self-control made his followers to love him and his enemies either to
give up and join his religion or to fear him and stay away. There was no human
being had his life more scrutinized and documented than the Prophet Muhammad.
His behavior was perfect with companions and fair with his foes.
Muhammad (Pbuh) in the Bible
By Dr. Adel Elsaie, Book
Title: "History of Truth, The Truth about God and Religions"
Throughout the
history, the Jews promoted the following concepts to reject Christianity:
- Abraham was Jewish, although
everyone knows that Judaism came from Judah son of Jacob. The Quran says
in Surah 3, Ayah 65: "Ye People of the Book, why dispute ye about Abraham,
when the Torah and the Gospel were not revealed till after him. Have ye no
understanding."
- Jesus was an illegitimate son
of Joseph or son of a Roman soldier.
- Jesus was crucified, therefore
he is not the expected Messiah.
The Christians fell
in this Jewish trap that Abraham was Jewish and that Jesus was crucified. Some
Jews and Christians reject Islam for many different reasons. Their hate to the
greatest man ever lived is based upon twisting the facts, misreading the
history, and simply wishful illusions. The unbelievers in Mecca called Muhammad
all kind of names, and accused him with many lies. According to the Quran, he
was called crazy, a poet, as well as touched by the devils. He was also accused
of collecting the old stories from the Jews and Christians, and then rewriting
them. Some Jews and Christians say the same things about the messenger of
Allah, and much more. The Jews accuse Jesus as the false Messiah, while the
Jews and the Christians accuse Muhammad as a false prophet. It is the same old
story.
When anyone speaks
kindly about the greatest man that ever lived, the opponents of Islam give an
immediate answer: either he was a fool or the Arabs bribed him!
- Michael H. Hart put Muhammad
No. 1 on his list of the 100 most influential people in history, and his
own Lord and Savior Jesus Christ No. 3.
- William McNeil, US historian,
considers Muhammad as worthy of honor in his list of the first three
names.
- James Gavin, US lieutenant
General, puts Muhammad before Jesus Christ.
- James Masserman, Psychoanalyst
and Professor, judges Muhammad No. 1 and his own Moses a close second.
- Thomas Carlyle said that the
Christian scholars’ lies about Muhammad are disgraceful.
- George Bernard Shaw said: "I
have studied him - the wonderful man - and in my opinion far from being an
anti-Christ, he must be called the savior of humanity."
- Encyclopedia Britannica calls
Muhammad the most successful of all religious personalities.
McNeil, Gavin, and
Masserman statements appeared in the Time magazine, July 15, 1974, in essays as to
"What makes a great leader? Throughout history, who qualifies?"
It is a fact that
Muhammad, like all the Arabs, came from Ismael, the son of Abraham. Just like
the Jews discredit Jesus, both the Jews and the Christians claim that Ismael was
an illegitimate son of Abraham. Another insult added to the prophets of God.
They are talking about Abraham, the father of all the prophets, the prophet
that God honored in the three religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
They maintain that Isaac was superior to Ismael, but that is not what the Bible
states:
Genesis
16:10 "And the angel of the Lord said unto her (Hagar), I will multiply
thy seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude."
Genesis
17:20 "And as for Ismael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed
him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly: twelve
princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation."
We still see some
verses in the Bible that escaped all the alterations and adaptations. The above
verse states clearly that God blessed Ismael. Is it possible that God blessed
an illegitimate child? Can God promise a mother that her illegitimate child
would make a great nation? The Jewish and the Christian rebuttal would be as
such: Yes, it is the will of God! Is it possible that the mighty prophet
Abraham would have an illegal wife and a son out of wedlock? The Bible says:
Genesis
16:3 "...And (Sarah) gave her (Hagar) to her husband to be his wife."
Genesis
20:12 "And yet indeed she (Sarah) is my sister; she is the daughter of
my father, but not the daughter of my mother, and she became my wife."
For the sake of
honesty, the above two verses conclude that Hagar was a legitimate wife, while
Sarah was not, because she was his "half sister"! Then for the sake
of alterations and adaptations, Ismael was the legitimate child because his
mother was his father’s wife, and Isaac was illegitimate, God forbid, because
his mother was his father’s sister! Islam does not advocate this nonsense. Both
Sarah and Hagar were legal righteous wives, and both Ismael and Isaac were
legitimate sons and prophets. This is the noble way to think.
The name Ismael was
chosen by God himself:
Genesis
16:11 "And the angel of the Lord said unto her (Hagar), Behold, thou
art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ismael."
What an honor to be
named by God himself! Different versions of the Bible began adapting the story
of Ismael. The RSV Bible added that Ismael would be a wild man; the Easy To
Read Bible added that Ismael would be wild "like a wild donkey"! HOW
SAD! Where is the reference to a wild donkey? This is a clear example of
the adulteration and alteration of the "Holy Bible." Any Christian
who reads this statement about Ismael, should research the origin of the wild
donkey! Do you think that this is Easy to Read Bible, or Easy to Manipulate
Bible! Please recall the above Genesis 17:20.
Criterion of the Prophet
A criterion of the
prophet is given by Jeremiah 28:9: "The prophet which prophesieth of
peace, when the word of the prophet shall come to pass, then shall the prophet
be known, that the Lord hath truly sent him." The word Islam also
signifies peace. Peace between the Creator and his creatures. This prophecy of
Jeremiah cannot be applied to Jesus, as he himself stated that he did not come
for peace:
Luke
12:51 "Do you suppose that I came to give peace on earth? I tell you,
not at all, but rather division." Why then during Christmas, is
the slogan of "peace on Earth" related to Jesus if he said: Nay to
peace on Earth! Muslims believe that Jesus came for "peace on Earth",
unlike Luke!
Until
Shiloh Come
The message of Jacob
to his sons before he died as in Genesis 49:10:
"The
scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet,
until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be."
Shiloh is also a
name of a town, but its real meaning is peace, i.e. Islam. It could never refer
to a town here. It is referred to a person. It could be an alteration of the
word "Shaluah", which means a messenger of God. So the Israelite
Prophethood in the lineage of Isaac would stop as soon as Shiloh comes. This
corresponds with the Quran:
Surah
2, Ayah 133: "Were ye witnesses when death appeared before Jacob?
Behold, he said to his sons: "What will ye worship after me?" They
said: "We shall worship Thy God and the God of thy fathers, of Abraham,
Ismael and Isaac, - the One (True) God; To Him do we submit."
The shift of the
prophethood to another nation was threatened in Jeremiah 31:36:
"If
those ordinances depart from before me, saith the Lord, then the seed of Israel
also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever."
Also Jesus hinted
about the same threat in Matthew 21:45:
"Therefore
say I unto you, the kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a
nation bringing forth the fruits thereof."
Baca
Is Mecca
According to the
Islamic tradition, Abraham took Ismael and Hagar, and made a new settlement in
Mecca, called Paran (Arabia) in the Bible (Genesis 21:21), because of divine
instruction given to him as part of God’s plan. When Abraham left, Hagar ran
seven times between two hills, Safa and Marwa, looking for water. This became
an Islamic ritual for the annual pilgrimage in Mecca by millions of Muslims
from all over the world. The well of water mentioned in genesis 21:19 is still
present, now called Zamzam, one of the living miracles in Islam. Both Abraham
and Ismael later built the holy house of God in Mecca, called Kaabah. The place
where Abraham used to pray near the Kaabah is still present, now called Maqam
Abrahim, i.e. the station of Abraham. The place where Ismael used to pray near
the Kaabah is still present, now called Maqam Ismael, i.e. the station of
Ismael. During the days of the pilgrimage, Pilgrims in Mecca and Muslims all
over the world commemorate the ultimate test of obedience of Abraham and Ismael
by sacrificing a lamb. The name Mecca is mentioned once in the Quran in Surah
48, Ayah 24. Another name for Mecca is Bakka, depending on the dialect of the
tribe. This name is also mentioned once in the Quran:
Surah
3, Ayah 96 "The first House (of worship) appointed for men was that at
Bakka: Full of blessing and of guidance for all worlds."
Amazingly enough,
this name Bakka is mentioned by prophet David in his Psalm 84:6:
"Who
passing through the valley of Baca make it a well; the rain also filleth the
pools."
The well here is the
well-known well of Zamzam, close to the Kaabah.
Chariot of Asses and Chariot of
Camels
The vision of Isaiah
of the two riders was as follows, in Isaiah 21:7
"And
he saw a chariot with a couple of horsemen, a chariot of asses, and a chariot
of camels."
Who was the rider
upon an ass? Every Sunday school student will know him. That was Jesus, as in John
12:14:
"And
Jesus, when he had found a young ass, sat upon it, as it is written."
Who, then, is the
promised rider on a camel? The readers of the Bible have overlooked this mighty
prophet. This is the prophet Muhammad. If this is not applied to him, then the
prophecy has yet to be fulfilled. That is why Isaiah mentioned further in the
same chapter, in 21:13: "The burden upon Arabia." Which means
the responsibility of the Arab Muslims, and of course now of all the Muslims,
to spread the message of Islam.
Isaiah 21:14: "The
inhabitants of the land of Tema brought water to him that was thirsty, they
prevented with their bread him that fled." Tema is probably Madinah
where the prophet Muhammad and his companions fled. Each immigrant was
brothered by one inhabitant of Madinah and was given food and shelter.
Isaiah 21:15: "For
they fled from the swords, from the drawn sword, and from the bent bow, and
from the grievousness of the war." This was when the prophet Muhammad
and his companions were persecuted and left Mecca to Madinah.
Isaiah 21:16: "For
thus hath the Lord said unto me, within a year according to the years of an
hireling, and all the glory of Kedar shall fail." Exactly in the
second year of immigration, the pagans were defeated in the first battle in
Islam.
Finally Isaiah 21:17
concludes with: "...the mighty men of the children of Kedar, shall be
diminished, for the Lord God of Israel hath spoken it." Kedar is the
second son of Ismael, (Genesis 25:13), from whom ultimately Muhammad came. In
the beginning, the children of Kedar were attacking Islam and Muhammad. But as
many of them accepted Islam, the number of the children of Kedar who resisted
Islam was diminished. In some verses in the Bible, Kedar is synonymous with
Arab in general, as in Ezekiel 27:21: "Arabia, and all the Princes of
Kedar..."
The Prophet Like Unto Moses
God addresses Moses
in Deuteronomy 18:18: "I will raise them up a prophet from among their
brethren, like unto thee (Moses), and will put my words in his mouth, and he
shall speak unto them all that I shall command him."
Brethren
of the Israelites (descendant of Abraham through Isaac) are the Ishmaelite
(descendant of Abraham through Ismael). Jesus should be excluded, as he is an
Israelite; otherwise the above verse should say: "Prophet from among
yourself."
Is
Muhammad not like unto Moses? If not accepted, then the promise has yet to be
fulfilled. The table below is self-explanatory:
|
Area
of comparison
|
Moses
|
Muhammad
|
Jesus
|
|
Birth
|
Usual
|
Usual
|
Unusual
|
|
Family life
|
Married, children
|
Married, children
|
Not married
|
|
Death
|
Usual
|
Usual
|
Unusual
|
|
Career
|
Prophet/Statesman
|
Prophet/Statesman
|
Prophet
|
|
Forced immigration
|
To Median
|
To Madinah
|
None
|
|
Encounter with
enemy
|
Hot pursuit
|
Hot
pursuit/Battles
|
No similar
encounter
|
|
Results of
encounter
|
Moral / physical
victory
|
Moral / physical
victory
|
Moral victory
|
|
Recording
revelation
|
In his life
(Torah)
|
In his life
(Quran)
|
After him
|
|
Nature of
teachings
|
Spiritual / legal
|
Spiritual / legal
|
Spiritual
|
|
Acceptance by his
people
|
Rejected then
accepted
|
Rejected then
accepted
|
Rejected by most
Israelites
|
In
Deuteronomy 18:19: "And it shall come to pass that whosoever will not
hearken my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of
him."
In the Quran 113 of
the 114 chapters starts with "In the name of Allah, most Gracious, most
Merciful." Also, in their daily work, Muslims start with this saying.
Notice "in my name", not in the name of God. God talks about His
Personal Name that is Allah. As it is a Personal Name, it is not subject to
gender, like god or goddess, or to plurality, like god or gods. Christians
start with "In the name of the father, the son, and the holy spirit."
Thus the above verse of Deuteronomy applies only to Muhammad.
Art Thou That Prophet?
The Jews are still
expecting the fulfillment of the prophecy of "unto like Moses." When
Jesus said that he is the Messiah of the Jews, they began to inquire about
Elias and the prophet. The Jews had a parallel prophecy that before the coming
of the Messiah, Elias must come first in his second coming. Jesus confirms this
Jewish belief:
Matthew
17:11-13 "...Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things. But
I say unto you, that Elias is come already, and they knew him not, then the
disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist."
The Jews did not
believe Jesus about Elias, so they sent priests and Levites to John the Baptist
to ask who he really was:
John
1:20-21 "And he (John the Baptist) confessed and denied not; but
confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, what then, Art thou Elias?
And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No."
Jesus said that
Elias came, and it was understood that he was John the Baptist. But John the
Baptist denied that. I will leave this discrepancy between John the Baptist and
Jesus for the Christian scholars to solve!
The Jews were waiting
for the fulfillment of three distinct prophecies:
1.
The coming of Christ.
2.
The coming of Elias.
3.
The coming of that prophet.
And the crucial
question here is "Art thou that prophet?" Who was then the long
awaited prophet after the advent of John the Baptist and Jesus? Was it not the
one like unto Moses, as described above, who was Muhammad?
Another
Comforter
John is the only
apostle to report the story of the last dialogue between Jesus and the
apostles. It happened after the last supper and before Jesus’ arrest. It ends
with a speech of four chapters long; John 14-17. It is interesting to note that
the synoptic do not refer to this very long speech. Did the text initially
exist in synoptic and then removed? If so, why? This adds to the long list of
mysteries of the Bible. Nevertheless, these chapters present a futuristic
outline with very important subject.
This farewell speech
seemed like Jesus was addressing the entire humanity with his vision and
recommendations. His main concern was to specify who would guide humanity after
him. In John 14:16: "And I will pray the father, and he shall give you
another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever." We do not
know exactly the original Aramaic word that Jesus used for the Comforter. Other
Bibles use Consoler, Advocate, Helper, and in Greek Bibles the word is
Baraclete. There are different explanations for the Comforter: the Holy Ghost,
the Word, a person, etc. In John 14:18, Jesus said: "I will not leave
you comfortless." This means that he referred to himself as Comforter.
However, in John 14:26, the Comforter is referred to as the Holy Ghost! And
Christian preachers assure their audience that the comforter is the Holy Ghost,
without any mention to the following references from John 15:26: "...he
shall testify of me."
John
16:7-8 "...It is expedient for you that I go away, for if I go not
away, the comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him
unto you. And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of
righteousness, and of judgment:"
John
16:13-14 "Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide
you into all truth, for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall
hear, that shall he speak, and he will shew you things to come. He shall
glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you."
Does the above
descriptions fit the Holy Ghost, spirit, or a person? The comforter is
described as to be able to hear and speak; does this fit a spirit or a person?
Did a deliberate adaptation of the Bible add a few words here and there to
alter the intended meanings that predicted the advent of a prophet after Jesus?
Was the Holy Ghost absent when Jesus was on Earth, and it was waiting for him
to depart, so it can guide the believers? Without any prejudice, one can
honestly conclude that Jesus was talking about a prophet that will establish
righteousness and Judgment. This is what Muhammad accomplished: righteousness
and Judgment, faith and law.
Whatever the
explanation is for the Comforter, we conclude that Jesus left unfinished work
and that someone was coming to complete his mission.
If one puts together
all the above-mentioned verses of the Bible about Shiloh (Islam), Baca,
chariots of camels, Prophet like unto Moses, Art thou that Prophet, and
Comforter, one should conclude without any doubt that these verses relates to
Islam and Muhammad. These verses escaped the human’s revision of the Bible. And
we can only hope that these verses will not be expunged from the next revised
version of the Bible!

Introduction Name
The Surah takes its name AL-ANFAL (The Bounties) from the first verse.
The Period of Revelation
It was revealed in 2 A. H. after the Battle of Badr, the first battle between Islam and kufr. As it contains a detailed and comprehensive review of the Battle, it appears that most probably it was revealed at one and the same time. But it is also possible that some of the verses concerning the problems arising as a result of this Battle might have been revealed later and incorporated at the proper places to make it a continuous whole. At any rate, in the whole Surah there is nothing that might show that it is a collection of a couple of discourses, that have been patched up together.
Historical Background
Before reviewing the Surah, it is worthwhile to consider the events that led to the Battle of Badr.
During the first decade or so of the Prophethood at Makkah, the Message had proved its firmness, and stability. This was the result of two things. First, the Messenger, who possessed the highest qualities of character, was performing his Mission with wisdom, foresight and magnanimity. He had shown by his conduct that he had made up his mind to carry the movement to a successful end and, therefore, was ready to face all sorts of dangers and obstacles in the way. Secondly, the Message was so charming that it attracted the minds and hearts of the people irresistibly towards itself. So much so that all obstacles of ignorance, superstition and petty prejudices failed to check, its advance. That is why the Arab upholders of the ways of "ignorance,' who looked down upon it in its initial stages, had' begun to reckon it as a serious menace during the last period of the stay of the Holy Prophet at Makkah, and were bent on crushing it with all the force at their command. But in spite of the above-mentioned strength, the movement still lacked certain things to lead it to victory:-
First, it had not yet been fully proved that it had gathered round it a sufficient number of such followers who not only believed in its truth, but also had such an intense devotion to its principles that they were ready to expend all their energies and all that they possessed in the struggle for its success and establishment. So much so that they were ready to sacrifice their lives in the fight against the whole world itself even though they should be their own nearest relative. It is true that the followers of Islam had endured the severest persecutions at the hands of the Quraish of Makkah and had given a good proof of the firmness of their faith and their strong relation with Islam, yet further trials were required to show that Islam had succeeded in acquiring such a band of followers which considered nothing dearer than its ideal and was ready to sacrifice life for it.
Secondly, though the voice of Islam had reached' every part of the country, its effects were yet scattered and its acquired strength was spread here and there: it had not yet gathered sufficient force essential for a decisive conflict with the old established order of "ignorance".
Thirdly, Islam had yet no home of its own and had not established itself firmly anywhere in the land where it could consolidate its power and make it a base for further action. For the Muslims were scattered all over the country and were living among the unbelievers as aliens whom their bloodthirsty enemies wanted to uproot from their own homes.
Fourthly, the Muslims had not yet had an opportunity to demonstrate practically the blessings of the system of life based on Islam. There was neither any Islamic culture, nor any social, economic or political system; nor were there any established principles of war and peace for their guidance. Therefore the Muslims had no opportunity for demonstrating those moral principles on which they intended to build their entire system of life; nor had it been proved on the touchstone of trial that the Muslims as a community were sincere in their proclamation of the Message.
Allah created opportunities for making up these deficiencies.
During the last four years or so of the Prophet's stay at Makkah, the voice of Islam had been proving effective at Yathrab and the people for various reasons had been accepting the message more readily than other clans of Arabia. So much so that in the twelfth year of Prophethood on the occasion of Haj a deputation of 75 people met the Holy Prophet in the darkness of night. These people not only accepted Islam, but also offered to give him and his followers a home. As this was a most epoch making opportunity provided by Allah, the Holy Prophet took advantage of it.
The significance of this offer was quite clear to the people of Yathrab, and they fully realized that this was not an invitation to a mere fugitive, but to the Messenger of Allah so that he should become their leader and ruler. Likewise they knew that they were not inviting the Muslim refugees to give them shelter from persecution but to assemble them from all over the country for their integration with themselves to form an organized community. Thus the offer of the people of Yathrab was to make Yathrab the "City of Islam." Accordingly the Holy Prophet accepted their invitation and made it the first "City of Islam" in Arabia.
And the people of Yathrab were fully aware of the implications of this offer. It was indeed a declaration of war against the whole of Arabia, and an invitation to their own social and economic boycott as well. And when the Ansar from Yathrab declared their allegiance to the Holy Prophet at Aqabah, they knew fully well its consequences. During the course of the formal declaration of allegiance, Asad-bin- Zurarah, the youngest of all the delegates from Yathrab, stood up and said, "0 people of Yathrab! Just listen to me and consider the matter carefully in all its aspects. Though we have come to him, regarding him only as a Messenger of Allah, we should know that we shall be inviting the enmity of the whole of Arabia. For when we take him away to Yathrab, we shall be attacked and our children may be put to the sword. Therefore if you have the courage in your hearts to face it, then and then only, you should declare your allegiance to him and Allah will give you its reward. But if you love your lives more than him and his Message, then leave this matter and frankly excuse yourselves, for at this time Allah may accept your excuses."
Abbas bin Ubadah bin Naalah, another member of the delegation, reiterated the same thing, saying,
Do you understand the implication of the declaration of your allegiance to this person?" (Voices, "Yes, we know it.") "You are challenging the whole world to war by your declaration of allegiance to him. There is every likelihood of a serious menace to your lives and properties. Therefore consider it well. If you have any idea lurking in your minds that you will then hand him over to his enemies, it is much better to leave him alone now, because that conduct shall bring shame and disgrace to you in this world and the next. On the other hand, if you have sincerely resolved that you will endure all kinds of consequences that will follow as a result of this invitation, then it would be the best thing to take the oath of allegiance to him because, by God, this will surely bring good to you in this world as well as in the next world."
At this all the members of the delegation cried with one voice, "We are ready and prepared to risk all our wealth and our noble kith and kin for his sake."
It was then that the famous oath of allegiance, which is known as the "Second Oath of Allegiance at Aqabah" was taken.
On the other side, the people of Makkah also understood fully well the implications of this matter from their own point of view. They realized that Muhammad (Allah's peace be upon him), who, they knew well, had a great personality and possessed extraordinary abilities, was going to gain a strong footing, by this allegiance. For this would help integrate his followers, whose constancy, determination, and unwavering fidelity to the Messenger had been tried, into a disciplined community under his wise leadership and guidance. And they knew that this would spell death for their old ways of life. They also realized the strategic importance of. Al- Madinah to their trade, which was their chief means of livelihood.
Its geographical position was such that the Muslims could strike with advantage at the caravans traveling on the trade route between Yaman and Syria, and thus strike at the root of their economy and that of other pagan clans very effectively. The value of the trade done by the people of Makkah alone on this route, not to count that of raif and other places, amounted to about two hundred thousand dinars annually.
As the Quraish were fully aware of the implications of the oath of allegiance at Aqabah, they were greatly perturbed when they got wind of it the same night. At first they tried to win over the people of Al-Madinah to their side. But when they saw that the Muslims were migrating to Al- Madinah in small groups, they realized that the Holy Prophet was also going to emigrate soon from there. Then they decided to adopt an extreme measure to prevent this danger.
A few days before his migration, the Quraish held a council to consider the matter. After a good deal of argument; they decided that one person should be taken from each of the families of Quraish other than that of Banu Hashim to put an end to the life of the Holy Prophet. This was to make it difficult for the family of the Holy Prophet to fight alone with all the other families of the Quraish and thus to force them to accept blood-money for his murder-instead of taking revenge from them, but by the grace of Allah their plot against the life of the Holy Prophet failed because of his admirable foresight and full trust in Allah, and he reached Al- Madinah safe and sound. When they could not prevent his emigration, it occurred to them to exploit Abdullah bin Ub`ai who had begun to cherish a grievance against the Holy Prophet since his arrival at Al-Madinah. He was an influential chief of Al-Madinah and the people had agreed to make him their king. But when the majority of Aus and Khazraj clan became Muslims and acknowledged the Holy Prophet as their leader, guide and ruler, all his hopes of becoming a king came to an end. Therefore the Quraish wrote to him, "As you have given shelter to our enemy, we tell you plainly that you should either fight with him yourself or exile him from your city otherwise we swear by God that we will invade your city, kill your males and make your females our slave girls." This letter added fuel to the flames of his jealousy and he was inclined to do some mischief, but the Holy Prophet took timely precautions and defeated his evil designs.
The Quraish got another opportunity to hold out a threat. When Sa'ad bin Mu'az, another chief of Al-Madinah, went to Makkah to perform `Umrah, Abu Jahl interrupted him at the very door of the Kabah, saying, "Do you think we will let you perform `Umrah in peace while you give shelter and help to renegades from us? Had you not been a guest of Ummayyah bin Khalf, you would not have gone alive from here." Sa'ad replied, "By Allah, if you prevent me from this, I will retaliate in a worse manner and block your route near Al-Madinah." This incident virtually led to a declaration from the people of Makkah that they would prevent the Muslims from a pilgrimage to the Kabah, and from the people of Al- Madinah that as a retaliation they would block their trade route to Syria against the opponents of Islam. As a matter of fact there was no other alternative for the Muslims than to keep a strong hold on this route so as to force the Quraish, and the other clans, whose interests were vitally bound with this route, to reconsider their inimical and antagonistic attitude towards them. That is why the Holy Prophet attached the greatest importance to this problem. As soon as he was free from making the preliminary arrangements for organizing the newly formed Muslim Community and settling peace terms with the neighboring Jewish habitations, he adopted two measures in this connection:-
First, he entered into negotiations with those clans who lived between the Red Sea and this route so as to make alliances with them or at east to persuade them to make treaties of neutrality with the Muslims. He was successful in this, and he entered into a treaty of non-alignment with Juhainah, which was a very important clan of the hilly tract near the sea coast. Then, at the end of the first year of Hijrah, he made a treaty of defensive alliance with Bani Damrah, who lived near Yanb'u and Zawal Ushairah. In 2 A. H. Bani Mudlij also joined the alliance, as they were the neighbors and allies of Bani Damrah. Then ii so happened that quite a large number of these people were converted to Islam as a result of the missionary work done by the Muslims.
Secondly, he successively sent small bands of his men on this route to serve as a warning to the Quraish, and himself accompanied some of them. In the first year of Hijrah, four expeditions were sent there, that is, the expedition under Hamzah, the expedition under Ubaidah bin Harith, the expedition under Sa'ad bin Abi Waqqas and the Al-Abwa' expedition under the Holy Prophet himself. In the first month of the second year two more incursions were made on the same route. These are known as Buwat Expedition and Zawal Ushairah Expedition. Two things about all these expeditions are noteworthy. First, no blood was shed and no caravans were plundered in any of these expeditions. This proves that the real object of these expeditions was to show to the Quraish which way the wind was blowing. Secondly, not a single man from the people of Al-Madinah was sent by the Holy. Prophet on any of these incursions. All the bands consisted purely of the immigrants from Makkah so that the conflict should remain between the people of the Quraish themselves and should not further spread by the involvement of other clans. On the other side, the Quraish of Makkah tried to involve others also in the conflict. When they sent bands towards Al-Madinah, they did not hesitate to plunder the people. For instance, an expedition under the leadership of Kurz bin Jabir al-Fihrl plundered the cattle of the people of Al-Madinah from the very vicinity of the city to show what their real intentions were.
This was the state of affairs when, in Sha'aban, 2 A. H. (February or March, 623 A. D.) a big trade caravan of the Quraish, carrying goods worth $50,000 or so, with only a guard of thirty to forty men, on its way back from Syria to Makkah, reached the territory from where it could be easily attacked from Al-Madinah. As the caravan was carrying trade goods worth thousands of pounds, and was scantily guarded, naturally Abu Sufyan, who was in charge of it, from his Past experience feared an attach from the Muslims. Accordingly, as soon as he entered the dangerous territory, he despatched a camel rider to Makkah with a frantic appeal for help. When the rider reached Makkah, he, following an old custom of Arabia, tore open the ears of his camel, cut open his nose and overturned the saddle. Then rending his shirt from front and behind, he began to cry aloud at the top of his voice, "O people of Quraish despatch help to protect your caravan from Syria under the charge of Abu Sufyan, for Muhammad with his followers is in pursuit of it; otherwise I don't think you will ever get your goods. Run, run for help." This caused great excitement and anger in the whole of Makkah and all the big chiefs of the Quraish got ready for war. An army, consisting of 600 armored soldiers and cavalry of 100 riders with great pomp and show marched out for a fight. They intended not only to rescue the caravan but also to put to an end, once for all, the new menace from the Muslims who had consolidated themselves at Al-Madinah. They wanted to crush that rising power and overawe the clans surrounding the route so as to make it absolutely secure for future trade.
Now the Holy Prophet, who always kept himself well informed of the state of affairs, felt that the decisive hour has come and that was the right time when he must take a bold step; otherwise the Islamic Movement would become lifeless for ever and no chance would be left for it to rise again. For if the Quraish invaded Al-Madinah, the odds would be against the Muslims. The condition of the Muslim Community was still very shaky because the immigrants (Muhajirin) had not been able to stabilize their economy during the short period (less than
two years) of their stay at Al-Madinah; their helpers, (the Ansar) had
not yet been tried; and the neighboring Jewish clans were antagonistic. Then there was a strong group of hypocrites and mushriks in Al- Madinah itself; above all, the surrounding clans lived in awe of the Quraish and had all their religious sympathies with them. The Holy Prophet, therefore, felt that the consequences of this possible invasion would not be favorable to the Muslims.
The second possibility was that they would not invade Al-Madinah but try only to escort their caravan safely and securely by a mere show of force. In that case, too, if the Muslim remained inactive, it would affect their reputation adversely. Obviously, this weak stand in the conflict would embolden the other Arabs also and make the position of the Muslims very insecure in the country and the surrounding clans would, at the instance of the Quraish, start hostilities against them, and the Jews, the hypocrites and the mushriks of Al- Madinah would openly rise against them and not only endanger their security of life, property and honor but make it difficult for them even to live there.
The Muslims would not be able to inspire the enemy with awe so as to keep safe from them their life, property and honor. A careful study of the situation led the Holy Prophet to make up his mind to take a decisive step and go into the battle with whatever little strength he could muster, for thus and thus only could he show whether the Muslim Community had the right to survive or was doomed to perish.
When he arrived at this momentous decision, he called the Muhajirin and the Ansar together and placed the whole position before them, without any reservation. He said, "Allah has promised that you will confront one of the two, the trade caravan coming from the north or the army of the Quraish marching from the south. Now tell me which of the two you want to attack!" A large majority of the people replied that they wanted to attack the caravan. But the Holy Prophet who had something else before him, repeated the same question. At this Miqdad bin 'Amr, a Muhajir, stood up and said, "0 Messenger of Allah! Please march to the side to which your Lord commands you; we will accompany you wherever you go. We will not say like the Israelites, 'Go and let you and your Lord fight we will wait'. In contrast to them we say, 'Let you and your Lord fight; we will fight by your side to our last breath'." Even then he did not announce any decision but waited for a reply from the Ansar who had not yet taken any part in any battle of Islam. As this was the first opportunity for them to prove that they were ready to fulfill their promise of fighting for the cause of Islam, he repeated the question without directly addressing them. At this, Sa'ad bin Mu'az, an Ansar, stood up and said, "Sir, it appears that you are putting the question to us." When the Holy Prophet said, "Yes", the Ansar replied, "We have believed in you and confirmed that what you have brought is the Truth, and have made a solemn pledge with you that we will listen to you and obey you. Therefore, 0 Messenger of Allah, do whatever you intend to do. We swear by Allah Who has sent you with the Truth that we are ready to accompany you to the sea shore and if you enter it, we will plunge into it. We assure you that not a single one of us will remain behind or forsake you, for we will not hesitate at all to go to fight, even if you should lead us to the battlefield tomorrow. We will remain steadfast in the battle and sacrifice our lives in the fight. We do hope that by the grace of Allah our behavior will gladden your heart. So, trusting in Allah's blessing, take us to the battlefield."
After these speeches it was decided that they should march towards the army of the Quraish and not towards the trade caravan. But it should be noted that the decision was of an ordinary nature. For the number of people, who came forward to go to the battlefield, was only a little more than three hundred (86 Muhajirs, 62 from Aus and 170 from Khazraj). Then the little army was ill-armed and hardly equipped for battle. Only a couple of them had horses to ride and the others had to take their turn in threes and fours on the back of a camel, out of the 70 they had in all. Above all, they had not got enough weapons for the battle; only 60 of them had armors. It is, therefore, no wonder that with the exception of those who were prepared to sacrifice their lives for the cause of Islam, the majority of those who had joined the expedition, were so filled with fear that they felt as if they were knowingly going into the jaws of death. Then there were people who always looked at things from a selfish point of view. Though they had embraced Islam, they did not realize that their faith would demand the sacrifice of their lives and properties from them; they were of the opinion that it was a mad expedition prompted by irrational enthusiasm for religion. But the Holy Prophet and the true Believers had realized the urgency of that critical hour which required the risk of life: therefore they marched straight to the south-west, wherefrom the army of the Quraish was coming. This is a clear proof of the fact that from the very beginning they had gone out to fight with the army and not to plunder the caravan. For if they had aimed at plundering the caravan they would have taken the north- westerly direction and not the south- westerly one.
The two parties met in combat at Badr on the seventeenth of Ramadan. When the two armies confronted each other and the Holy Prophet noticed that the Quraish army outnumbered the Muslims by three to one and was much better equipped, he raised his hands up in supplication and made this earnest prayer with great humility: "0 Allah! Here are the Quraish proud of their war material: they have come to prove that Thy Messenger is false. 0 Allah! now send that success that Thou hast promised to give me. 0 Allah!If this little army of Thy servants is destroyed, then there will be left none in the land to worship Thee."
In this combat the emigrants from Makkah were put to the hardest test for they had to fight against their own near and dear relatives and put to the sword their fathers, their sons, their paternal and maternal uncles and their brothers. It is obvious that only such people could have come out successful in this hardest of tests as had accepted the Truth sincerely and cut off all relations with falsehood. And in another way the test to which the Ansar were put was not less hard. So far they had only alienated the powerful Quraish and their allies by giving shelter to the Muslims against their wishes but now, for the first time, they were going to give fight to them and to sow the seeds of a long and bitter war with them. This was indeed a very hard test for it meant that a small town with a population of a few thousand inhabitants was going to wage a war with the whole of Arabia. It is obvious that only such people could take this bold step who believed in the Truth of Islam so firmly that they were ready to sacrifice every personal interest for its sake.
So Allah accepted the self-sacrifices of the Muhajirin and the Ansar because of their true faith, and rewarded them with His success. The proud, well- armed Quraish were routed by these ill-equipped devotees of Islam. Seventy men of their army were killed and seventy captured as prisoners and their arms and equipment came into the hands of the Muslims as spoils of war. All their big chiefs, who were their best soldiers and who had led the opposition to Islam, were killed in this Battle. No wonder that this decisive victory made Islam a power to be reckoned with. A Western research scholar says that before the Battle of Badr, Islam was merely a religion and a state but after the Battle it became the state religion, nay, the state itself.
Topics of Discussion
It is this great Battle that has been reviewed in this Surah. But let it be noted that in some respects this review is quite different from the reviews that are usually made by the worldly commanders after a great victory.
Instead of gloating over the victory, the moral weaknesses that had come to the surface in that expedition have been pointed out so that the Muslims should try their best to reform themselves.
It has been impressed upon them that the victory was due to the success of Allah rather -than to their own valor and bravery so that the Muslims should learn to rely on Him and obey Allah and His Messenger alone.
The moral lesson of the conflict between the Truth and falsehood has been enunciated and the qualities which lead to success in a conflict have been explained.
Then the Surah addresses the mushriks, the hypocrites, the Jews and the prisoners of this war in a very impressive manner that should teach them a good lesson.
It also gives instructions in regard to the spoils of war. The Muslims have bean told not to regard these as their right but as a bounty from Allah. Therefore they should accept with gratitude the share that is granted to them out of it and willingly accede to the share which Allah sets apart for His cause and for the help of the needy.
Then it also gives normal instructions concerning the laws of peace and war for these were urgently needed to be explained at the stage which the Islamic Movement had entered. It enjoined that the Muslims should refrain from ways of "ignorance" in peace and war and thus should establish their moral superiority in the world. It also meant, to demonstrate to the world in actual practical life the morality which it had been preaching to the world from the very beginning of Islam and had been enjoining that practical life should be based on the same.
It also states some articles of the Islamic Constitution which help differentiate the status of the Muslims living within the limits of Dar-ul-Islam (the Abode of Islam) from that of the Muslims living beyond its limits.
Subject: Problems of Jihad
This
surah enunciates general principles of war (one aspect of Jihad) and
peace while reviewing the Battle of Badr and uses them for the moral
training of the Muslims.
Topics and their Interconnection
This
portion deals with the problems of the "Spoils of War". The Quran says
that these are not the spoils of war but the "Bounties of Allah" and
proves this by showing that the victory at Badr (and in all other
battles, too,) was won by His succour and not by the efforts of the
Muslims. It also declares (in v. 40) that the war aim of the Muslims
should be to eliminate all unfavourable conditions for the
establishment of Islam and not to gain spoils. Moreover, the spoils,
being the bounties of God, belong to Allah and His Messenger and they
alone are entitled to allocate them. Then after conditioning the
Muslims to accept these things, the different shares have been
allocated in v. 41. 1 - 41
The Battle of Badr was ordained
by Allah so that Islam should triumph over "ignorance". The lesson from
this is that the Muslims should trust in God and prepare themselves for
war and should not be beguiled by Satan as the disbelievers were. 42 -
54
Sanctity of treaties has been enjoined and the Muslims
commanded to observe them as long as the other party does not break
them. 55 - 59
The Muslims should always be prepared for war
on every front, but should be ready to make peace if the other party is
inclined towards it. 60 - 66
In these verses, instructions about prisoners of war have been given. 67 - 71
In
order to keep the Muslims joined together against their enemies, they
have been taught to have cordial relations with one another. 72 - 75
Bismillahir Rahmanir Rahim
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
1. They ask thee concerning (things taken as)
spoils of war. Say: "(such) spoils are at the disposal of Allah and the
Messenger. So fear Allah, and keep straight the relations between
yourselves: Obey Allah and His Messenger, if ye do believe."
2. For, Believers are those who, when Allah is
mentioned, feel a tremor in their hearts, and when they hear His signs
rehearsed, find their faith strengthened, and put (all) their trust in
their Lord;
3. Who establish regular prayers and spend (freely) out of the gifts We have given them for sustenance:
4. Such in truth are the believers: they have grades of dignity with their Lord, and forgiveness, and generous sustenance:
5. Just as thy Lord ordered thee out of thy house in truth, even though a party among the Believers disliked it,
6. Disputing with thee concerning the truth
after it was made manifest, as if they were being driven to death and
they (actually) saw it.
7. Behold! Allah promised you one of the two
(enemy) parties, that it should be yours: Ye wished that the one
unarmed should be yours, but Allah willed to justify the Truth
according to His words and to cut off the roots of the Unbelievers;-
8. That He might justify Truth and prove Falsehood false, distasteful though it be to those in guilt.
9. Remember ye implored the assistance of your
Lord, and He answered you: "I will assist you with a thousand of the
angels, ranks on ranks."
10. Allah made it but a message of hope, and an
assurance to your hearts: (in any case) there is no help except from
Allah. and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.
11. Remember He covered you with a sort of
drowsiness, to give you calm as from Himself, and he caused rain to
descend on you from heaven, to clean you therewith, to remove from you
the stain of Satan, to strengthen your hearts, and to plant your feet
firmly therewith.
12. Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with
the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will
instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their
necks and smite all their finger-tips off them."
13. This because they contended against Allah
and His Messenger. If any contend against Allah and His Messenger,
Allah is strict in punishment.
14. Thus (will it be said): "Taste ye then of the (punishment): for those who resist Allah, is the penalty of the Fire."
15. O ye who believe! when ye meet the Unbelievers in hostile array, never turn your backs to them.
16. If any do turn his back to them on such a
day - unless it be in a stratagem of war, or to retreat to a troop (of
his own)- he draws on himself the wrath of Allah, and his abode is
Hell,- an evil refuge (indeed)!
17. It is not ye who slew them; it was Allah.
when thou threwest (a handful of dust), it was not thy act, but
Allah.s: in order that He might test the Believers by a gracious trial
from Himself: for Allah is He Who heareth and knoweth (all things).
18. That, and also because Allah is He Who makes feeble the plans and stratagem of the Unbelievers.
19. (O Unbelievers!) if ye prayed for victory
and judgment, now hath the judgment come to you: if ye desist (from
wrong), it will be best for you: if ye return (to the attack), so shall
We. Not the least good will your forces be to you even if they were
multiplied: for verily Allah is with those who believe!
20. O ye who believe! Obey Allah and His Messenger, and turn not away from him when ye hear (him speak).
21. Nor be like those who say, "We hear," but listen not:
22. For the worst of beasts in the sight of Allah are the deaf and the dumb,- those who understand not.
23. If Allah had found in them any good. He
would indeed have made them listen: (As it is), if He had made them
listen, they would but have turned back and declined (Faith).
24. O ye who believe! give your response to
Allah and His Messenger, when He calleth you to that which will give
you life; and know that Allah cometh in between a man and his heart,
and that it is He to Whom ye shall (all) be gathered.
25. And fear tumult or oppression, which
affecteth not in particular (only) those of you who do wrong: and know
that Allah is strict in punishment.
26. Call to mind when ye were a small (band),
despised through the land, and afraid that men might despoil and kidnap
you; But He provided a safe asylum for you, strengthened you with His
aid, and gave you Good things for sustenance: that ye might be
grateful.
27. O ye that believe! betray not the trust of Allah and the Messenger, nor misappropriate knowingly things entrusted to you.
28. And know ye that your possessions and your progeny are but a trial; and that it is Allah with Whom lies your highest reward.
29. O ye who believe! if ye fear Allah, He will
grant you a criterion (to judge between right and wrong), remove from
you (all) evil (that may afflict) you, and forgive you: for Allah is
the Lord of grace unbounded.
30. Remember how the Unbelievers plotted
against thee, to keep thee in bonds, or slay thee, or get thee out (of
thy home). They plot and plan, and Allah too plans; but the best of
planners is Allah.
31. When Our Signs are rehearsed to them, they
say: "We have heard this (before): if we wished, we could say (words)
like these: these are nothing but tales of the ancients."
32. Remember how they said: "O Allah if this is
indeed the Truth from Thee, rain down on us a shower of stones form the
sky, or send us a grievous penalty."
33. But Allah was not going to send them a
penalty whilst thou wast amongst them; nor was He going to send it
whilst they could ask for pardon.
34. But what plea have they that Allah should
not punish them, when they keep out (men) from the sacred Mosque - and
they are not its guardians? No men can be its guardians except the
righteous; but most of them do not understand.
35. Their prayer at the House (of Allah. is
nothing but whistling and clapping of hands: (Its only answer can be),
"Taste ye the penalty because ye blasphemed."
36. The Unbelievers spend their wealth to
hinder (man) from the path of Allah, and so will they continue to
spend; but in the end they will have (only) regrets and sighs; at
length they will be overcome: and the Unbelievers will be gathered
together to Hell;-
37. In order that Allah may separate the impure
from the pure, put the impure, one on another, heap them together, and
cast them into Hell. They will be the ones to have lost.
38. Say to the Unbelievers, if (now) they
desist (from Unbelief), their past would be forgiven them; but if they
persist, the punishment of those before them is already (a matter of
warning for them).
39. And fight them on until there is no more
tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah
altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily Allah doth see all
that they do.
40. If they refuse, be sure that Allah is your Protector - the best to protect and the best to help.
41. And know that out of all the booty that ye
may acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to Allah,- and to the
Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the
wayfarer,- if ye do believe in Allah and in the revelation We sent down
to Our servant on the Day of Testing,- the Day of the meeting of the
two forces. For Allah hath power over all things.
42. Remember ye were on the hither side of the
valley, and they on the farther side, and the caravan on lower ground
than ye. Even if ye had made a mutual appointment to meet, ye would
certainly have failed in the appointment: But (thus ye met), that Allah
might accomplish a matter already enacted; that those who died might
die after a clear Sign (had been given), and those who lived might live
after a Clear Sign (had been given). And verily Allah is He Who heareth
and knoweth (all things).
43. Remember in thy dream Allah showed them to
thee as few: if He had shown them to thee as many, ye would surely have
been discouraged, and ye would surely have disputed in (your) decision;
but Allah saved (you): for He knoweth well the (secrets) of (all)
hearts.
44. And remember when ye met, He showed them to
you as few in your eyes, and He made you appear as contemptible in
their eyes: that Allah might accomplish a matter already enacted. For
to Allah do all questions go back (for decision).
45. O ye who believe! When ye meet a force, be firm, and call Allah in remembrance much (and often); that ye may prosper:
46. And obey Allah and His Messenger. and fall
into no disputes, lest ye lose heart and your power depart; and be
patient and persevering: For Allah is with those who patiently
persevere:
47. And be not like those who started from
their homes insolently and to be seen of men, and to hinder (men) from
the path of Allah. For Allah compasseth round about all that they do.
48. Remember Satan made their (sinful) acts
seem alluring to them, and said: "No one among men can overcome you
this day, while I am near to you": But when the two forces came in
sight of each other, he turned on his heels, and said: "Lo! I am clear
of you; lo! I see what ye see not; Lo! I fear Allah. for Allah is
strict in punishment."
49. Lo! the hypocrites say, and those in whose
hearts is a disease: "These people,- their religion has misled them."
But if any trust in Allah, behold! Allah is Exalted in might, Wise.
50. If thou couldst see, when the angels take
the souls of the Unbelievers (at death), (How) they smite their faces
and their backs, (saying): "Taste the penalty of the blazing Fire-
51. "Because of (the deeds) which your (own) hands sent forth; for Allah is never unjust to His servants:
52. "(Deeds) after the manner of the people of
Pharaoh and of those before them: They rejected the Signs of Allah, and
Allah punished them for their crimes: for Allah is Strong, and Strict
in punishment:
53. "Because Allah will never change the grace
which He hath bestowed on a people until they change what is in their
(own) souls: and verily Allah is He Who heareth and knoweth (all
things)."
54. (Deeds) after the manner of the people of
Pharaoh and those before them": They treated as false the Signs of
their Lord: so We destroyed them for their crimes, and We drowned the
people of Pharaoh: for they were all oppressors and wrong- doers.
55. For the worst of beasts in the sight of Allah are those who reject Him: They will not believe.
56. They are those with whom thou didst make a
covenant, but they break their covenant every time, and they have not
the fear (of Allah..
57. If ye gain the mastery over them in war, disperse, with them, those who follow them, that they may remember.
58. If thou fearest treachery from any group,
throw back (their covenant) to them, (so as to be) on equal terms: for
Allah loveth not the treacherous.
59. Let not the unbelievers think that they can get the better (of the godly): they will never frustrate (them).
60. Against them make ready your strength to
the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror
into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others
besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye
shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye
shall not be treated unjustly.
61. But if the enemy incline towards peace, do
thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in Allah. for He is One
that heareth and knoweth (all things).
62. Should they intend to deceive thee,- verily
Allah sufficeth thee: He it is That hath strengthened thee with His aid
and with (the company of) the Believers;
63. And (moreover) He hath put affection
between their hearts: not if thou hadst spent all that is in the earth,
couldst thou have produced that affection, but Allah hath done it: for
He is Exalted in might, Wise.
64. O Messenger. sufficient unto thee is Allah,- (unto thee) and unto those who follow thee among the Believers.
65. O Messenger. rouse the Believers to the
fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they
will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand
of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding.
66. For the present, Allah hath lightened your
(task), for He knoweth that there is a weak spot in you: But (even so),
if there are a hundred of you, patient and persevering, they will
vanquish two hundred, and if a thousand, they will vanquish two
thousand, with the leave of Allah. for Allah is with those who
patiently persevere.
67. It is not fitting for an apostle that he
should have prisoners of war until he hath thoroughly subdued the land.
Ye look for the temporal goods of this world; but Allah looketh to the
Hereafter: And Allah is Exalted in might, Wise.
68. Had it not been for a previous ordainment from Allah, a severe penalty would have reached you for the (ransom) that ye took.
69. But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good: but fear Allah. for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
70. O Messenger. say to those who are captives
in your hands: "If Allah findeth any good in your hearts, He will give
you something better than what has been taken from you, and He will
forgive you: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful."
71. But if they have treacherous designs
against thee, (O Messenger.), they have already been in treason against
Allah, and so hath He given (thee) power over them. And Allah so He Who
hath (full) knowledge and wisdom.
72. Those who believed, and adopted exile, and
fought for the Faith, with their property and their persons, in the
cause of Allah, as well as those who gave (them) asylum and aid,- these
are (all) friends and protectors, one of another. As to those who
believed but came not into exile, ye owe no duty of protection to them
until they come into exile; but if they seek your aid in religion, it
is your duty to help them, except against a people with whom ye have a
treaty of mutual alliance. And (remember) Allah seeth all that ye do.
73. The Unbelievers are protectors, one of
another: Unless ye do this, (protect each other), there would be tumult
and oppression on earth, and great mischief.
74. Those who believe, and adopt exile, and
fight for the Faith, in the cause of Allah as well as those who give
(them) asylum and aid,- these are (all) in very truth the Believers:
for them is the forgiveness of sins and a provision most generous.
75. And those who accept Faith subsequently,
and adopt exile, and fight for the Faith in your company,- they are of
you. But kindred by blood have prior rights against each other in the
Book of Allah. Verily Allah is well-acquainted with all things.
Benefits of the recitation of Surah
al-Anfaal (The Spoils of War)
This surah was revealed in Madinah and it has 75 verses. In
the commentary of Majma’ul Bayaan, it is narrated from Imam Ja’far
as-Sadiq (a.s.) that whoever recites surah al-Anfaal and surah at-Tawba every
month, he will be protected from being a hypocrite and will be counted among
the followers of Ameerul Mu’mineen – Imam Ali (a.s.), and on the day of Qiyamah
he will eat from the table-spread of Jannah together with all the
followers of Ahlul Bayt.
This surah contains the verse about khums, which is
the right of the Ahlul Bayt. The Holy Prophet (s.a.w) said that he
will, on the Day of Judgement, intercede
for the person who recites this surah and will bear witness that the reciter of
this surah was free from hypocrisy. Keeping surah al-Anfaal in your possession
at all times ensures that you get your rights that have been taken from you and
your legitimate desires are fulfilled.
Navigate: (Previous 20 entries)
|
|