SHOWING THE RIGHT WAY CALLED ISLAMSunday, December 31, 20064:14AM - Why Are british Women Turning To Islam?January 28, 2006 Western women are turning to Islam in rapidly increasing numbers. KAY JARDINE discovers why they are so keen to become Muslims. Bullying, depression, and insomnia made Kimberley McCrindle’s teenage years particularly difficult. Taunts from classmates about her weight and how she looked left the 19-year-old student feeling like she didn’t really fit in, and always searching for something that would make her feel happy, that would make her feel she belonged. McCrindle, from a family of atheists, did not encounter religion until she began religious studies at high school in Penicuik, when her new interest prompted her to start going to her local church on Sundays. But the peace and happiness McCrindle was looking for eluded her until she started college in Edinburgh, where she made friends with some Muslim people and discovered Islam. “I was looking for peace,” she says. “I’d had a rough past. My teenage years weren’t great: I was bullied at school, people called me fat and ugly, and I was looking for something to make me happy. I tried to go to church once a week but I wouldn’t class myself a Christian; I was just interested. But it wasn’t for me, I didn’t feel in place there. “When you walk into a mosque you feel really peaceful. Praying five times a day is really focused. It gives you a purpose in your life. The Koran is like a guide to help you: when you read it, it makes you feel better.” McCrindle became a Muslim three years ago and is now known by her married Arabic name, Tasnim Salih. She is one of a rapidly increasing number of British women turning to Islam, thought to be the fastest growing religion in the world. Although there are no official figures on the subject, there is no doubt that the number of converts is on the rise and the majority are women, according to Nicole Bourque, a senior lecturer in social anthropology at Glasgow University and an expert in conversion to Islam in Britain. “There are people converting all the time,” she says. “I would estimate that there are probably around 200 converts to Islam in Glasgow alone, but that’s just a rough estimate. The data is difficult to acquire.” Other estimates put the Glasgow figure closer to 500. Mohammad Faroghul-Quadri, imam at the Khazra mosque in Glasgow, says that whichever religion people choose to reach God, whether it’s Christianity or Islam or something else, the important thing is that they are getting peace of mind and heart, and proper guidance from God. The appeal of Islam to liberated western women is difficult for many to understand, largely because of the widespread perception in the west that it treats women badly. A forthcoming documentary, Mum I’m a Muslim, addresses this very issue by talking to converts in Sheffield about their experiences. At a preview in Glasgow, I asked a group of converts from Glasgow and Edinburgh what motivated them to change every aspect of their lives, including their names, to become Muslim. For 27-year-old Bahiya Malik, or Lucy Norris to her parents, it’s difficult to xplain. Bahiya, who lives in Edinburgh, her twin sister, Victoria, and their brother, atthew, grew up as practising Christians in a rural area in the West Midlands, where they attended Sunday school in the little church at the top of their road. As they got older, the three stopped going to church and seven years ago, at the age of 20, both Bahiya and her sister converted to Islam - six months after their brother. “Maybe all through our teenage years we hadn’t been that happy. I can’t really say what it was. I don’t know if we felt there was something missing or that we didn’t fit in. We were a little bit shy and we weren’t really outgoing sort of people,” she says. At the time, Bahiya was two years into a media and television course in Edinburgh but was feeling uninspired. After around six months of learning about Islam, Bahiya realised that living her life according to the rules of Islam was what would make her happy and, during an emotional visit to a mosque in London, made her declaration of faith. “I think it’s something you feel in your heart, this pull,” she says. “You can’t really put it into words. It’s like your heart speaking, something you feel inside and you know it’s for you. Allah has chosen this for you, it’s out of your power.” Women who turn to Islam are aware of the widespread western perception that they are oppressed and discriminated against, but insist that the depiction is a false image. For many it is a spiritual journey, which, far from repressing them, improves their social status and gives them new rights. “You seem to be really looked after,” says Tasnim. “As a Muslim woman, Muslim men really respect you; they do everything for you. You’re highly thought of and protected.” Bahiya says: “I feel that because you cover yourself up you’re not seen as a sex symbol, and because people can’t judge you on your appearance, they have to judge you as a human being. That’s quite liberating.” As an act of modesty, many Muslim women don’t wear make up outside the home and it is often a part of their old life that new female converts are happy to discard because of the liberating feeling that comes from knowing their appearance doesn’t matter. They resist being shown as they were before their conversion. Hafsa Hashmi, who lives in Glasgow, converted to Islam 24 years ago and felt > life outside Islam was like having to “keep up with the Joneses”. Under Islam, however, she says: “Your aim is not for this life, your aim is for the afterlife. To some people that sounds pretty horrific: they can’t think about death, but in Islam belief in the afterlife is one of its main features, because you know if you’re doing the right thing you’ve got a better life to come. So why go for all the material things?” Converting to Islam usually means a complete change of lifestyle for those who take the plunge, including a different diet, often a new Arabic name, and your time revolving around the five daily Islamic prayers. In the workplace, some people organise with their employer a room where they can have some peace and quiet to pray. Wherever they are in the world, all Muslims face in the direction of the Kab’aa, or the Holy House in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, during prayer. For female converts, the experience can also involve a quite dramatic change in appearance. Muslim law provides that women must dress modestly. The hijab, or the head scarf, is a particular focal point and can be a tricky area for new Muslim women to deal with. Dr Bourque suggests this is because it is such a visible symbol of the faith. Tasnim wore the hijab straight away, although she found wearing it in public scary at first because she felt people were looking at her. She was then forced to take it off when she was out because of some of the comments directed at her. “People would shout, ‘Go back home to your own country’. I had someone spit at me once when I was standing at the bus stop at college.” Now, though, she wears it all the time and says: “People don’t say anything to me now and I feel more confident about wearing it.” Bahiya was happy wearing the hijab from the beginning, but her parents found it quite difficult. She says her sister, her brother, and herself were lucky because their parents were “quite good” about their conversion. For others, however, families are not always so accepting, often because they know little about the religion and why their loved ones want to follow it. For Tasnim, telling her parents, who are atheist, was nerve-wracking. “They thought I was going through a phase at first but they realised when I started wearing the hijab that I was serious. They started getting angry when I began to talk about getting married. They weren’t too pleased that I’d met someone older than me, who was Muslim as well, and a different nationality.” While Tasnim and her mother are still close and enjoy a good relationship, they tend not to talk about her faith much. She and her father no longer speak. For Hafsa, telling her parents 24 years ago was perhaps even more difficult because converting to Islam then was anything but a common occurrence. The reactions of her parents were totally opposite. “I think my mother felt that I was only becoming a Muslim because of who I was marrying, but that wasn’t the case because I had been introduced to Islam about four years previously although I didn’t convert until I got married. It took her practically her whole life to get over it. When we got married, my mum said, ‘If you’re happy, I’m happy’, but obviously she wasn’t. My dad said it and he meant it, that was the difference between them.” Tasnim has been married to Sabir, who is Sudanese, for two years, and says she has never been happier. “I met my husband at college and it seemed like the right thing to do. I was teaching him English and he was talking to me about Islam, and we just fell in love,” she says. Bahiya’s husband, Sharafuddin, is also is also a convert, formerly known as Cameron. They have two children, aged two and four. For Tasnim, Bahiya, and Hafsa, life revolves around the five daily prayers, they cannot eat certain foods, or drink alcohol. But the women say they miss nothing from the days before they converted to Islam. “Islam is enough for me,” says Bahiya. “You don’t need anything else once you’ve found it.” Becoming Muslim has provided Tasnim with the happiness and belonging she was looking for. “It’s a complete change in your attitude, behaviour, and the way you think,” she says. “I’m now more confident, happy and satisfied. I’ve achieved the fulfilment I was looking for.” Source: The Herald 2:35AM - TESTIMONIES OF JEWISH CONVERTS TO ISLAM - Interview with Maryam JameelahTESTIMONIES OF JEWISH CONVERTS TO ISLAM These are True Stories of Jewish People who followed Judaism and became Muslim, despite the Israeli Arab political conflict, more and more Jews are realizing that Judaism and Christianity are light houses leading to Islam, whether you were a Messianic Jew, a Jew for Jesus, or an Orthodox Jew, any Jew can be for Allah. Because Everyone is born a Muslim (in Submission to Allah) Everyday Jews are Returning (Reverting) to their Religion of Birth and the Religion of Abraham, Moses, and all the past Prophets, Islam. Interview with Maryam Jameelah Q: Would you kindly tell us how your interest in Islam began? A: I was Margaret (Peggy) Marcus. As a small child I possessed a keen interest in music and was particularly fond of the classical operas and symphonies considered high culture in the West. Music was my favorite subject in school in which I always earned the highest grades. By sheer chance, I happened to hear Arabic music over the radio which so much pleased me that I was determined to hear more. I would not leave my parents in peace until my father finally took me to the Syrian section in New York City where I bought a stack of Arabic recordings. My parents, relatives and neighbors thought Arabic and its music dreadfully weird and so distressing to their ears that whenever I put on my recordings, they demanded that I close all the doors and windows in my room lest they be disturbed! After I embraced Islam in 1961, I used to sit enthralled by the hour at the mosque in New York, listening to tape-recordings of Tilawat chanted by the celebrated Egyptian Qari, Abdul Basit. But on Jumha Salat (Friday Prayers), the Imam did not play the tapes. We had a special guest that day. A short, very thin and poorly-dressed black youth, who introduced himself to us as a student from Zanzibar, recited Surah ar-Rahman. I never heard such glorious Tilawat even from Abdul Basit! He possessed such a voice of gold; surely Hazrat Bilal must have sounded much like him! I traced the beginning of my interest in Islam to the age of ten. While attending a reformed Jewish Sunday school, I became fascinated with the historical relationship between the Jews and the Arabs. From my Jewish textbooks, I learned that Abraham was the father of the Arabs as well as the Jews. I read how centuries later when, in medieval Europe, Christian persecution made their lives intolerable, the Jews were welcomed in Muslim Spain and that it was the magnanimity of this same Arabic Islamic civilization which stimulated Hebrew culture to reach its highest peak of achievement. Totally unaware of the true nature of Zionism, I naively thought that the Jews were returning to Palestine to strengthen their close ties of kinship in religion and culture with their Semitic cousins. Together I believed that the Jews and the Arabs would cooperate to attain another Golden Age of culture in the Middle East. Despite my fascination with the study of Jewish history, I was extremely unhappy at the Sunday school. At this time I identified myself strongly with the Jewish people in Europe, then suffering a horrible fate under the Nazis and I was shocked that none of my fellow classmates nor their parents took their religion seriously. During the services at the synagogue, the children used to read comic strips hidden in their prayer books and laugh to scorn at the rituals. The children were so noisy and disorderly that the teachers could not discipline them and found it very difficult to conduct the classes. At home the atmosphere for religious observance was scarcely more congenial. My elder sister detested the Sunday school so much that my mother literally had to drag her out of bed in the mornings and it never went without the struggle of tears and hot words. Finally my parents were exhausted and let her quit. On the Jewish High Holy Days instead of attending synagogue and fasting on Yom Kippur, my sister and I were taken out of school to attend family picnics and parties in fine restaurants. When my sister and I convinced our parents how miserable we both were at the Sunday school they joined an agnostic, humanist organization known as the Ethical Culture Movement. The Ethical Culture Movement was founded late in the 19th century by Felix Alder. While studying for rabbinate, Felix Alder grew convinced that devotion to ethical values as relative and man-made, regarding any supernaturalism or theology as irrelevant, constituted the only religion fit for the modern world. I attended the Ethical Culture Sunday School each week from the age of eleven until I graduated at fifteen. Here I grew into complete accord with the ideas of the movement and regarded all traditional, organized religions with scorn. When I was eighteen years old I became a member of the local Zionist youth movement known as the Mizrachi Hatzair. But when I found out what the nature of Zionism was, which made the hostility between Jews and Arabs irreconcilable, I left several months later in disgust. When I was twenty and a student at New York University, one of my elective courses was entitled Judaism in Islam. My professor, Rabbi Abraham Isaac Katsh, the head of the department of Hebrew Studies there, spared no efforts to convince his students--all Jews, many of whom aspired to become rabbis--that Islam was derived from Judaism. Our textbook, written by him, took each verse from the Quran, painstakingly tracing it to its allegedly Jewish source. Although his real aim was to prove to his students the superiority of Judaism over Islam, he convinced me diametrically of the opposite. I soon discovered that Zionism was merely a combination of the racist, tribalistic aspects of Judaism. Modern secular nationalistic Zionism was further discredited in my eyes when I learned that few, if any, of the leaders of Zionism were observant Jews and that perhaps nowhere is Orthodox, traditional Judaism regarded with such intense contempt as in Israel. When I found nearly all important Jewish leaders in America supporters for Zionism, who felt not the slightest twinge of conscience because of the terrible injustice inflicted upon the Palestinian Arabs, I could no longer consider myself a Jew at heart. One morning in November 1954, Professor Katsh, during his lecture, argued with irrefutable logic that the monotheism taught by Moses (peace be upon him) and the Divine Laws reveled to him were indispensable as the basis for all higher ethical values. If morals were purely man-made, as the Ethical Culture and other agnostic and atheistic philosophies taught, then they could be changed at will, according to mere whim, convenience or circumstance. The result would be utter chaos leading to individual and collective ruin. Belief in the Hereafter, as the Rabbis in the Talmud taught, argued Professor Katsh, was not mere wishful thinking but a moral necessity. Only those, he said, who firmly believed that each of us will be summoned by God on Judgement Day to render a complete account of our life on earth and rewarded or punished accordingly, will possess the self-discipline to sacrifice transitory pleasure and endure hardships and sacrifice to attain lasting good. It was in Professor Katsh's class that I met Zenita, the most unusual and fascinating girl I have ever met. The first time I entered Professor Katsh's class, as I looked around the room for an empty desk in which to sit, I spied two empty seats, on the arm of one, three big beautifully bound volumes of Yusuf Ali's English translation and commentary of the Holy Quran. I sat down right there, burning with curiosity to find out to whom these volumes belonged. Just before Rabbi Katsh's lecture was to begin, a tall, very slim girl with pale complexion framed by thick auburn hair, sat next to me. Her appearance was so distinctive, I thought she must be a foreign student from Turkey, Syria or some other Near Eastern country. Most of the other students were young men wearing the black cap of Orthodox Jewry, who wanted to become rabbis. We two were the only girls in the class. As we were leaving the library late that afternoon, she introduced herself to me. Born into an Orthodox Jewish family, her parents had migrated to America from Russia only a few years prior to the October Revolution in 1917 to escape persecution. I noted that my new friend spoke English with the precise care of a foreigner. She confirmed these speculations, telling me that since her family and their friends speak only Yiddish among themselves, she did not learn any English until after attending public school. She told me that her name was Zenita Liebermann but recently, in an attempt to Americanize themselves, her parents had changed their name from "Liebermann" to "Lane." Besides being thoroughly instructed in Hebrew by her father while growing up and also in school, she said she was now spending all her spare time studying Arabic. However, with no previous warning, Zenita dropped out of class and although I continued to attend all of his lectures to the conclusion of the course, Zenita never returned. Months passed and I had almost forgotten about Zenita when suddenly she called and begged me to meet her at the Metropolitan Museum and go with her to look at the special exhibition of exquisite Arabic calligraphy and ancient illuminated manuscripts of the Quran. During our tour of the museum, Zenita told me how she had embraced Islam with two of her Palestinian friends as witnesses. I inquired, "Why did you decide to become a Muslim?" She then told me that she had left Professor Katsh's class when she fell ill with a severe kidney infection. Her condition was so critical, she told me, her mother and father had not expected her to survive. "One afternoon while burning with fever, I reached for my Holy Quran on the table beside by bed and began to read and while I recited the verses, it touched me so deeply that I began to weep and then I knew I would recover. As soon as I was strong enough to leave my bed, I summoned two of my Muslim friends and took the oath of the "Shahadah" or Confession of Faith." Zenita and I would eat our meals in Syrian restaurants where I acquired a keen taste for this tasty cooking. When we had money to spend, we would order Couscous, roast lamb with rice or a whole soup plate of delicious little meatballs swimming in gravy scooped up with loaves of unleavened Arabic bread. And when we had little to spend, we would eat lentils and rice, Arabic style, or the Egyptian national dish of black broad beans with plenty of garlic and onions called "Ful". While Professor Katsh was lecturing thus, I was comparing in my mind what I had read in the Old Testament and the Talmud with what was taught in the Quran and Hadith and finding Judaism so defective, I was converted to Islam. Q: Were you scared that you might not be accepted by the Muslims? A: My increasing sympathy for Islam and Islamic ideals enraged the other Jews I knew, who regarded me as having betrayed them in the worst possible way. They used to tell me that such a reputation could only result from shame of my ancestral heritage and an intense hatred for my people. They warned me that even if I tried to become a Muslim, I would never be accepted. These fears proved totally unfounded as I have never been stigmatized by any Muslim because of my Jewish origin. As soon as I became a Muslim myself, I was welcomed most enthusiastically by all the Muslims as one of them. I did not embrace Islam out of hatred for my ancestral heritage or my people. It was not a desire so much to reject as to fulfill. To me, it meant a transition from parochial to a dynamic and revolutionary faith. Q: Did your family object to your studying Islam? A: Although I wanted to become a Muslim as far back as 1954, my family managed to argue me out of it. I was warned that Islam would complicate my life because it is not, like Judaism and Christianity, part of the American scene. I was told that Islam would alienate me from my family and isolate me from the community. At that time my faith was not sufficiently strong to withstand these pressures. Partly as the result of this inner turmoil, I became so ill that I had to discontinue college long before it was time for me to graduate. For the next two years I remained at home under private medical care, steadily growing worse. In desperation from 1957 - 1959 my parents confined me both to private and public hospitals where I vowed that if ever I recovered sufficiently to be discharged, I would embrace Islam. After I was allowed to return home, I investigated all the opportunities for meeting Muslims in New York City. It was my good fortune to meet some of the finest men and women anyone could ever hope to meet. I also began to write articles for Muslim magazines. Q: What was the attitude of your parents and friends after you became Muslim? A: When I embraced Islam, my parents, relatives and their friends regarded me almost as a fanatic, because I could think and talk of nothing else. To them, religion is a purely private concern which at the most perhaps could be cultivated like an amateur hobby among other hobbies. But as soon as I read the Holy Quran, I knew that Islam was no hobby but life itself! Q: In what ways did the Holy Quran have an impact on your life? A: One evening I was feeling particularly exhausted and sleepless, Mother came into my room and said she was about to go to the Larchmont Public Library and asked me if there was any book that I wanted? I asked her to look and see if the library had a copy of an English translation of the Holy Quran. Just think, years of passionate interest in the Arabs and reading every book in the library about them I could lay my hands on but until now, I never thought to see what was in the Holy Quran! Mother returned with a copy for me. I was so eager, I literally grabbed it from her hands and read it the whole night. There I also found all the familiar Bible stories of my childhood. In my eight years of primary school, four years of secondary school and one year of college, I learned about English grammar and composition, French, Spanish, Latin and Greek in current use, Arithmetic, Geometry, Algebra, European and American history, elementary science, Biology, music and art--but I had never learned anything about God! Can you imagine I was so ignorant of God that I wrote to my pen-friend, a Pakistani lawyer, and confessed to him the reason why I was an atheist was because I couldn't believe that God was really an old man with a long white beard who sat up on His throne in Heaven. When he asked me where I had learned this outrageous thing, I told him of the reproductions from the Sistine Chapel I had seen in "Life" Magazine of Michelangelo's "Creation" and "Original Sin." I described all the representations of God as an old man with a long white beard and the numerous crucifixions of Christ I had seen with Paula at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. But in the Holy Quran, I read: "Allah! There is no god but He,-the Living, The Self-subsisting, Supporter of all. No slumber can seize Him nor sleep. His are all things in the heavens and on earth. Who is thee can intercede in His presence except as He permiteth? He knoweth what (appeareth to His creatures as) before or after or behind them. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His Throne doth extend over the heavens and the earth, and He feeleth no fatigue in guarding and preserving them for He is the Most High, the Supreme (in glory)." (Quran S.2:255) "But the Unbelievers,-their deeds are like a mirage in sandy deserts, which the man parched with thirst mistakes for water; until when he comes up to it, he finds Allah there, and Allah will pay him his account: and Allah is swift in taking account. Or (the unbelievers' state) is like the depths of darkness in a vast deep ocean, overwhelmed with billow topped by billow, topped by (dark) clouds: depth of darkness, one above another: if a man stretches out his hand, he can hardly see it! for any to whom Allah giveth not light, there is no light!" (Quran S.24: 39-40) My first thought when reading the Holy Quran - this is the only true religion - absolutely sincere, honest, not allowing cheap compromises or hypocrisy. In 1959, I spent much of my leisure time reading books about Islam in the New York Public Library. It was there I discovered four bulky volumes of an English translation of Mishkat ul- Masabih. It was then that I learned that a proper and detailed understanding of the Holy Quran is not possible without some knowledge of the relevant Hadith. For how can the holy text correctly be interpreted except by the Prophet to whom it was revealed? Once I had studied the Mishkat, I began to accept the Holy Quran as Divine revelation. What persuaded me that the Quran must be from God and not composed by Muhammad (PBUH) was its satisfying and convincing answers to all the most important questions of life which I could not find elsewhere. As a child, I was so mortally afraid of death, particularly the thought of my own death, that after nightmares about it, sometimes I would awaken my parents crying in the middle of the night. When I asked them why I had to die and what would happen to me after death, all they could say was that I had to accept the inevitable; but that was a long way off and because medical science was constantly advancing, perhaps I would live to be a hundred years old! My parents, family, and all our friends rejected as superstition any thought of the Hereafter, regarding Judgment Day, reward in Paradise or punishment in Hell as outmoded concepts of by-gone ages. In vain I searched all the chapters of the Old Testament for any clear and unambiguous concept of the Hereafter. The prophets, patriarchs and sages of the Bible all receive their rewards or punishments in this world. Typical is the story of Job (Hazrat Ayub). God destroyed all his loved-ones, his possessions, and afflicted him with a loathsome disease in order to test his faith. Job plaintively laments to God why He should make a righteous man suffer. At the end of the story, God restores all his earthly losses but nothing is even mentioned about any possible consequences in the Hereafter. Although I did find the Hereafter mentioned in the New Testament, compared with that of the Holy Quran, it is vague and ambiguous. I found no answer to the question of death in Orthodox Judaism, for the Talmud preaches that even the worst life is better than death. My parents' philosophy was that one must avoid contemplating the thought of death and just enjoy as best one can, the pleasures life has to offer at the moment. According to them, the purpose of life is enjoyment and pleasure achieved through self-expression of one's talents, the love of family, the congenial company of friends combined with the comfortable living and indulgence in the variety of amusements that affluent America makes available in such abundance. They deliberately cultivated this superficial approach to life as if it were the guarantee for their continued happiness and good-fortune. Through bitter experience I discovered that self-indulgence leads only to misery and that nothing great or even worthwhile is ever accomplished without struggle through adversity and self-sacrifice. From my earliest childhood, I have always wanted to accomplish important and significant things. Above all else, before my death I wanted the assurance that I have not wasted life in sinful deeds or worthless pursuits. All my life I have been intensely serious-minded. I have always detested the frivolity which is the dominant characteristic of contemporary culture. My father once disturbed me with his unsettling conviction that there is nothing of permanent value and because everything in this modern age accept the present trends inevitable and adjust ourselves to them. I, however, was thirsty to attain something that would endure forever. It was from the Holy Quran where I learned that this aspiration was possible. No good deed for the sake of seeking the pleasure of God is ever wasted or lost. Even if the person concerned never achieves any worldly recognition, his reward is certain in the Hereafter. Conversely, the Quran tells us that those who are guided by no moral considerations other than expediency or social conformity and crave the freedom to do as they please, no matter how much worldly success and prosperity they attain or how keenly they are able to relish the short span of their earthly life, will be doomed as the losers on Judgement Day. Islam teaches us that in order to devote our exclusive attention to fulfilling our duties to God and to our fellow-beings, we must abandon all vain and useless activities which distract us from this end. These teachings of the Holy Quran, made even more explicit by Hadith, were thoroughly compatible with my temperament. Q: What is your opinion of the Arabs after you became a Muslim? A: As the years passed, the realization gradually dawned upon me that it was not the Arabs who made Islam great but rather Islam had made the Arabs great. Were it not for the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), the Arabs would be an obscure people today. And were it not for the Holy Quran, the Arabic language would be equally insignificant, if not extinct. Q: Did you see any similarities between Judaism and Islam? A: The kinship between Judaism and Islam is even stronger than Islam and Christianity. Both Judaism and Islam share in common the same uncompromising monotheism, the crucial importance of strict obedience to Divine Law as proof of our submission to and love of the Creator, the rejection of the priesthood, celibacy and monasticism and the striking similarity of the Hebrew and Arabic language. In Judaism, religion is so confused with nationalism, one can scarcely distinguish between the two. The name "Judaism" is derived from Judah-a tribe. A Jew is a member of the tribe of Judah. Even the name of this religion connotes no universal spiritual message. A Jew is not a Jew by virtue of his belief in the unity of God, but merely because he happened to be born of Jewish parentage. Should he become an outspoken atheist, he is no less "Jewish" in the eyes of his fellow Jews. Such a thorough corruption with nationalism has spiritually impoverished this religion in all its aspects. God is not the God of all mankind but the God of Israel. The scriptures are not God's revelation to the entire human race but primarily a Jewish history book. David and Solomon (peace be upon them) are not full-fledged prophets of God but merely Jewish kings. With the single exception of Yom Kippur (the Jewish Day of Atonement), the holidays and festivals celebrated by Jews, such as Hanukkah, Purim and Pesach, are of far greater national than religious significance. Q: Have you ever had the opportunity to talk about Islam to the other Jews? A: There is one particular incident which really stands out in my mind when I had the opportunity to discuss Islam with a Jewish gentleman. Dr. Shoreibah, of the Islamic Center in New York, introduced me to a very special guest. After one Jumha Salat, I went into his office to ask him some questions about Islam but before I could even greet him with "Assalamu Alaikum", I was completely astonished and surprised to see seated before him an ultra-orthodox Chassidic Jew, complete with earlocks, broad-brimmed black hat, long black silken caftan and a full flowing beard. Under his arm was a copy of the Yiddish newspaper, "The Daily Forward". He told us that his name was Samuel Kostelwitz and that he worked in New York City as a diamond cutter. Most of his family, he said, lived in the Chassidic community of Williamsburg in Brooklyn, but he also had many relatives and friends in Israel. Born in a small Rumanian town, he had fled from the Nazi terror with his parents to America just prior to the outbreak of the second world-war. I asked him what had brought him to the mosque? He told us that he had been stricken with intolerable grief ever since his mother died 5 years ago. He had tried to find solace and consolation for his grief in the synagogue but could not when he discovered that many of the Jews, even in the ultra-orthodox community of Williamsburg, were shameless hypocrites. His recent trip to Israel had left him more bitterly disillusioned than ever. He was shocked by the irreligiousness he found in Israel and he told us that nearly all the young sabras or native-born Israelis are militant atheists. When he saw large herds of swine on one of the kibbutzim (collective farms) he visited, he could only exclaim in horror: "Pigs in a Jewish state! I never thought that was possible until I came here! Then when I witnessed the brutal treatment meted out to innocent Arabs in Israel, I know then that there is no difference between the Israelis and the Nazis. Never, never in the name of God, could I justify such terrible crimes!" Then he turned to Dr. Shoreibah and told him that he wanted to become a Muslim but before he took the irrevocable steps to formal conversion, he needed to have more knowledge about Islam. He said that he had purchased from Orientalia Bookshop, some books on Arabic grammar and was trying to teach himself Arabic. He apologized to us for his broken English: Yiddish was his native tongue and Hebrew, his second language. Among themselves, his family and friends spoke only Yiddish. Since his reading knowledge of English was extremely poor, he had no access to good Islamic literature. However, with the aid of an English dictionary, he painfully read "Introduction to Islam" by Muhammad Hamidullah of Paris and praised this as the best book he had ever read. In the presence of Dr. Shoreibah, I spent another hour with Mr. Kostelwitz, comparing the Bible stories of the patriarchs and prophets with their counterparts in the Holy Quran. I pointed out the inconsistencies and interpolations of the Bible, illustrating my point with Noah's alleged drunkenness, accusing David of adultery and Solomon of idolatry (Allah Forbid) and how the Holy Quran raises all these patriarchs to the status of genuine prophets of God and absolves them from all these crimes. I also pointed out why it was Ismail and not Isaac who God commanded Abraham to offer as sacrifice. In the Bible, God tells Abraham: "Take thine son, thine only son whom thou lovest and offer him up to Me as burnt offering." Now Ismail was born 13 years before Isaac but the Jewish biblical commentators explain that away be belittling Ismail's mother, Hagar, as only a concubine and not Abraham's real wife so they say Isaac was the only legitimate son. Islamic traditions, however, raise Hagar to the status of a full-fledged wife equal in every respect to Sarah. Mr. Kostelwitz expressed his deepest gratitude to me for spending so much time, explaining those truths to him. To express this gratitude, he insisted on inviting Dr. Shoreibah and me to lunch at the Kosher Jewish delicatessen where he always goes to eat his lunch. Mr. Kostelwitz told us that he wished more than anything else to embrace Islam but he feared he could not withstand the persecution he would have to face from his family and friends. I told him to pray to God for help and strength and he promised that he would. When he left us, I felt privileged to have spoken with such a gentle and kind person. Q: What Impact did Islam have on your life ? A: In Islam, my quest for absolute values was satisfied. In Islam I found all that was true, good and beautiful and that which gives meaning and direction to human life (and death); while in other religions, the Truth is deformed, distorted, restricted and fragmentary. If any one chooses to ask me how I came to know this, I can only reply my personal life experience was sufficient to convince me. My adherence to the Islamic faith is thus a calm, cool but very intense conviction. I have, I believe, always been a Muslim at heart by temperament, even before I knew there was such a thing as Islam. My conversion was mainly a formality, involving no radical change in my heart at all but rather only making official what I had been thinking and yearning for many years. Also read Maryam Jameelah's Open Letter to Her Parents in which she invites her mother and father to embrace the one true religion.
2:34AM - TESTIMONIES OF JEWISH CONVERTS TO ISLAM - Interview with Maryam JameelahInterview with Maryam Jameelah Q: Would you kindly tell us how your interest in Islam began? A: I was Margaret (Peggy) Marcus. As a small child I possessed a keen interest in music and was particularly fond of the classical operas and symphonies considered high culture in the West. Music was my favorite subject in school in which I always earned the highest grades. By sheer chance, I happened to hear Arabic music over the radio which so much pleased me that I was determined to hear more. I would not leave my parents in peace until my father finally took me to the Syrian section in New York City where I bought a stack of Arabic recordings. My parents, relatives and neighbors thought Arabic and its music dreadfully weird and so distressing to their ears that whenever I put on my recordings, they demanded that I close all the doors and windows in my room lest they be disturbed! After I embraced Islam in 1961, I used to sit enthralled by the hour at the mosque in New York, listening to tape-recordings of Tilawat chanted by the celebrated Egyptian Qari, Abdul Basit. But on Jumha Salat (Friday Prayers), the Imam did not play the tapes. We had a special guest that day. A short, very thin and poorly-dressed black youth, who introduced himself to us as a student from Zanzibar, recited Surah ar-Rahman. I never heard such glorious Tilawat even from Abdul Basit! He possessed such a voice of gold; surely Hazrat Bilal must have sounded much like him! I traced the beginning of my interest in Islam to the age of ten. While attending a reformed Jewish Sunday school, I became fascinated with the historical relationship between the Jews and the Arabs. From my Jewish textbooks, I learned that Abraham was the father of the Arabs as well as the Jews. I read how centuries later when, in medieval Europe, Christian persecution made their lives intolerable, the Jews were welcomed in Muslim Spain and that it was the magnanimity of this same Arabic Islamic civilization which stimulated Hebrew culture to reach its highest peak of achievement. Totally unaware of the true nature of Zionism, I naively thought that the Jews were returning to Palestine to strengthen their close ties of kinship in religion and culture with their Semitic cousins. Together I believed that the Jews and the Arabs would cooperate to attain another Golden Age of culture in the Middle East. Despite my fascination with the study of Jewish history, I was extremely unhappy at the Sunday school. At this time I identified myself strongly with the Jewish people in Europe, then suffering a horrible fate under the Nazis and I was shocked that none of my fellow classmates nor their parents took their religion seriously. During the services at the synagogue, the children used to read comic strips hidden in their prayer books and laugh to scorn at the rituals. The children were so noisy and disorderly that the teachers could not discipline them and found it very difficult to conduct the classes. At home the atmosphere for religious observance was scarcely more congenial. My elder sister detested the Sunday school so much that my mother literally had to drag her out of bed in the mornings and it never went without the struggle of tears and hot words. Finally my parents were exhausted and let her quit. On the Jewish High Holy Days instead of attending synagogue and fasting on Yom Kippur, my sister and I were taken out of school to attend family picnics and parties in fine restaurants. When my sister and I convinced our parents how miserable we both were at the Sunday school they joined an agnostic, humanist organization known as the Ethical Culture Movement. The Ethical Culture Movement was founded late in the 19th century by Felix Alder. While studying for rabbinate, Felix Alder grew convinced that devotion to ethical values as relative and man-made, regarding any supernaturalism or theology as irrelevant, constituted the only religion fit for the modern world. I attended the Ethical Culture Sunday School each week from the age of eleven until I graduated at fifteen. Here I grew into complete accord with the ideas of the movement and regarded all traditional, organized religions with scorn. When I was eighteen years old I became a member of the local Zionist youth movement known as the Mizrachi Hatzair. But when I found out what the nature of Zionism was, which made the hostility between Jews and Arabs irreconcilable, I left several months later in disgust. When I was twenty and a student at New York University, one of my elective courses was entitled Judaism in Islam. My professor, Rabbi Abraham Isaac Katsh, the head of the department of Hebrew Studies there, spared no efforts to convince his students--all Jews, many of whom aspired to become rabbis--that Islam was derived from Judaism. Our textbook, written by him, took each verse from the Quran, painstakingly tracing it to its allegedly Jewish source. Although his real aim was to prove to his students the superiority of Judaism over Islam, he convinced me diametrically of the opposite. I soon discovered that Zionism was merely a combination of the racist, tribalistic aspects of Judaism. Modern secular nationalistic Zionism was further discredited in my eyes when I learned that few, if any, of the leaders of Zionism were observant Jews and that perhaps nowhere is Orthodox, traditional Judaism regarded with such intense contempt as in Israel. When I found nearly all important Jewish leaders in America supporters for Zionism, who felt not the slightest twinge of conscience because of the terrible injustice inflicted upon the Palestinian Arabs, I could no longer consider myself a Jew at heart. One morning in November 1954, Professor Katsh, during his lecture, argued with irrefutable logic that the monotheism taught by Moses (peace be upon him) and the Divine Laws reveled to him were indispensable as the basis for all higher ethical values. If morals were purely man-made, as the Ethical Culture and other agnostic and atheistic philosophies taught, then they could be changed at will, according to mere whim, convenience or circumstance. The result would be utter chaos leading to individual and collective ruin. Belief in the Hereafter, as the Rabbis in the Talmud taught, argued Professor Katsh, was not mere wishful thinking but a moral necessity. Only those, he said, who firmly believed that each of us will be summoned by God on Judgement Day to render a complete account of our life on earth and rewarded or punished accordingly, will possess the self-discipline to sacrifice transitory pleasure and endure hardships and sacrifice to attain lasting good. It was in Professor Katsh's class that I met Zenita, the most unusual and fascinating girl I have ever met. The first time I entered Professor Katsh's class, as I looked around the room for an empty desk in which to sit, I spied two empty seats, on the arm of one, three big beautifully bound volumes of Yusuf Ali's English translation and commentary of the Holy Quran. I sat down right there, burning with curiosity to find out to whom these volumes belonged. Just before Rabbi Katsh's lecture was to begin, a tall, very slim girl with pale complexion framed by thick auburn hair, sat next to me. Her appearance was so distinctive, I thought she must be a foreign student from Turkey, Syria or some other Near Eastern country. Most of the other students were young men wearing the black cap of Orthodox Jewry, who wanted to become rabbis. We two were the only girls in the class. As we were leaving the library late that afternoon, she introduced herself to me. Born into an Orthodox Jewish family, her parents had migrated to America from Russia only a few years prior to the October Revolution in 1917 to escape persecution. I noted that my new friend spoke English with the precise care of a foreigner. She confirmed these speculations, telling me that since her family and their friends speak only Yiddish among themselves, she did not learn any English until after attending public school. She told me that her name was Zenita Liebermann but recently, in an attempt to Americanize themselves, her parents had changed their name from "Liebermann" to "Lane." Besides being thoroughly instructed in Hebrew by her father while growing up and also in school, she said she was now spending all her spare time studying Arabic. However, with no previous warning, Zenita dropped out of class and although I continued to attend all of his lectures to the conclusion of the course, Zenita never returned. Months passed and I had almost forgotten about Zenita when suddenly she called and begged me to meet her at the Metropolitan Museum and go with her to look at the special exhibition of exquisite Arabic calligraphy and ancient illuminated manuscripts of the Quran. During our tour of the museum, Zenita told me how she had embraced Islam with two of her Palestinian friends as witnesses. I inquired, "Why did you decide to become a Muslim?" She then told me that she had left Professor Katsh's class when she fell ill with a severe kidney infection. Her condition was so critical, she told me, her mother and father had not expected her to survive. "One afternoon while burning with fever, I reached for my Holy Quran on the table beside by bed and began to read and while I recited the verses, it touched me so deeply that I began to weep and then I knew I would recover. As soon as I was strong enough to leave my bed, I summoned two of my Muslim friends and took the oath of the "Shahadah" or Confession of Faith." Zenita and I would eat our meals in Syrian restaurants where I acquired a keen taste for this tasty cooking. When we had money to spend, we would order Couscous, roast lamb with rice or a whole soup plate of delicious little meatballs swimming in gravy scooped up with loaves of unleavened Arabic bread. And when we had little to spend, we would eat lentils and rice, Arabic style, or the Egyptian national dish of black broad beans with plenty of garlic and onions called "Ful". While Professor Katsh was lecturing thus, I was comparing in my mind what I had read in the Old Testament and the Talmud with what was taught in the Quran and Hadith and finding Judaism so defective, I was converted to Islam. Q: Were you scared that you might not be accepted by the Muslims? A: My increasing sympathy for Islam and Islamic ideals enraged the other Jews I knew, who regarded me as having betrayed them in the worst possible way. They used to tell me that such a reputation could only result from shame of my ancestral heritage and an intense hatred for my people. They warned me that even if I tried to become a Muslim, I would never be accepted. These fears proved totally unfounded as I have never been stigmatized by any Muslim because of my Jewish origin. As soon as I became a Muslim myself, I was welcomed most enthusiastically by all the Muslims as one of them. I did not embrace Islam out of hatred for my ancestral heritage or my people. It was not a desire so much to reject as to fulfill. To me, it meant a transition from parochial to a dynamic and revolutionary faith. Q: Did your family object to your studying Islam? A: Although I wanted to become a Muslim as far back as 1954, my family managed to argue me out of it. I was warned that Islam would complicate my life because it is not, like Judaism and Christianity, part of the American scene. I was told that Islam would alienate me from my family and isolate me from the community. At that time my faith was not sufficiently strong to withstand these pressures. Partly as the result of this inner turmoil, I became so ill that I had to discontinue college long before it was time for me to graduate. For the next two years I remained at home under private medical care, steadily growing worse. In desperation from 1957 - 1959 my parents confined me both to private and public hospitals where I vowed that if ever I recovered sufficiently to be discharged, I would embrace Islam. After I was allowed to return home, I investigated all the opportunities for meeting Muslims in New York City. It was my good fortune to meet some of the finest men and women anyone could ever hope to meet. I also began to write articles for Muslim magazines. Q: What was the attitude of your parents and friends after you became Muslim? A: When I embraced Islam, my parents, relatives and their friends regarded me almost as a fanatic, because I could think and talk of nothing else. To them, religion is a purely private concern which at the most perhaps could be cultivated like an amateur hobby among other hobbies. But as soon as I read the Holy Quran, I knew that Islam was no hobby but life itself! Q: In what ways did the Holy Quran have an impact on your life? A: One evening I was feeling particularly exhausted and sleepless, Mother came into my room and said she was about to go to the Larchmont Public Library and asked me if there was any book that I wanted? I asked her to look and see if the library had a copy of an English translation of the Holy Quran. Just think, years of passionate interest in the Arabs and reading every book in the library about them I could lay my hands on but until now, I never thought to see what was in the Holy Quran! Mother returned with a copy for me. I was so eager, I literally grabbed it from her hands and read it the whole night. There I also found all the familiar Bible stories of my childhood. In my eight years of primary school, four years of secondary school and one year of college, I learned about English grammar and composition, French, Spanish, Latin and Greek in current use, Arithmetic, Geometry, Algebra, European and American history, elementary science, Biology, music and art--but I had never learned anything about God! Can you imagine I was so ignorant of God that I wrote to my pen-friend, a Pakistani lawyer, and confessed to him the reason why I was an atheist was because I couldn't believe that God was really an old man with a long white beard who sat up on His throne in Heaven. When he asked me where I had learned this outrageous thing, I told him of the reproductions from the Sistine Chapel I had seen in "Life" Magazine of Michelangelo's "Creation" and "Original Sin." I described all the representations of God as an old man with a long white beard and the numerous crucifixions of Christ I had seen with Paula at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. But in the Holy Quran, I read: "Allah! There is no god but He,-the Living, The Self-subsisting, Supporter of all. No slumber can seize Him nor sleep. His are all things in the heavens and on earth. Who is thee can intercede in His presence except as He permiteth? He knoweth what (appeareth to His creatures as) before or after or behind them. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His Throne doth extend over the heavens and the earth, and He feeleth no fatigue in guarding and preserving them for He is the Most High, the Supreme (in glory)." (Quran S.2:255) "But the Unbelievers,-their deeds are like a mirage in sandy deserts, which the man parched with thirst mistakes for water; until when he comes up to it, he finds Allah there, and Allah will pay him his account: and Allah is swift in taking account. Or (the unbelievers' state) is like the depths of darkness in a vast deep ocean, overwhelmed with billow topped by billow, topped by (dark) clouds: depth of darkness, one above another: if a man stretches out his hand, he can hardly see it! for any to whom Allah giveth not light, there is no light!" (Quran S.24: 39-40) My first thought when reading the Holy Quran - this is the only true religion - absolutely sincere, honest, not allowing cheap compromises or hypocrisy. In 1959, I spent much of my leisure time reading books about Islam in the New York Public Library. It was there I discovered four bulky volumes of an English translation of Mishkat ul- Masabih. It was then that I learned that a proper and detailed understanding of the Holy Quran is not possible without some knowledge of the relevant Hadith. For how can the holy text correctly be interpreted except by the Prophet to whom it was revealed? Once I had studied the Mishkat, I began to accept the Holy Quran as Divine revelation. What persuaded me that the Quran must be from God and not composed by Muhammad (PBUH) was its satisfying and convincing answers to all the most important questions of life which I could not find elsewhere. As a child, I was so mortally afraid of death, particularly the thought of my own death, that after nightmares about it, sometimes I would awaken my parents crying in the middle of the night. When I asked them why I had to die and what would happen to me after death, all they could say was that I had to accept the inevitable; but that was a long way off and because medical science was constantly advancing, perhaps I would live to be a hundred years old! My parents, family, and all our friends rejected as superstition any thought of the Hereafter, regarding Judgment Day, reward in Paradise or punishment in Hell as outmoded concepts of by-gone ages. In vain I searched all the chapters of the Old Testament for any clear and unambiguous concept of the Hereafter. The prophets, patriarchs and sages of the Bible all receive their rewards or punishments in this world. Typical is the story of Job (Hazrat Ayub). God destroyed all his loved-ones, his possessions, and afflicted him with a loathsome disease in order to test his faith. Job plaintively laments to God why He should make a righteous man suffer. At the end of the story, God restores all his earthly losses but nothing is even mentioned about any possible consequences in the Hereafter. Although I did find the Hereafter mentioned in the New Testament, compared with that of the Holy Quran, it is vague and ambiguous. I found no answer to the question of death in Orthodox Judaism, for the Talmud preaches that even the worst life is better than death. My parents' philosophy was that one must avoid contemplating the thought of death and just enjoy as best one can, the pleasures life has to offer at the moment. According to them, the purpose of life is enjoyment and pleasure achieved through self-expression of one's talents, the love of family, the congenial company of friends combined with the comfortable living and indulgence in the variety of amusements that affluent America makes available in such abundance. They deliberately cultivated this superficial approach to life as if it were the guarantee for their continued happiness and good-fortune. Through bitter experience I discovered that self-indulgence leads only to misery and that nothing great or even worthwhile is ever accomplished without struggle through adversity and self-sacrifice. From my earliest childhood, I have always wanted to accomplish important and significant things. Above all else, before my death I wanted the assurance that I have not wasted life in sinful deeds or worthless pursuits. All my life I have been intensely serious-minded. I have always detested the frivolity which is the dominant characteristic of contemporary culture. My father once disturbed me with his unsettling conviction that there is nothing of permanent value and because everything in this modern age accept the present trends inevitable and adjust ourselves to them. I, however, was thirsty to attain something that would endure forever. It was from the Holy Quran where I learned that this aspiration was possible. No good deed for the sake of seeking the pleasure of God is ever wasted or lost. Even if the person concerned never achieves any worldly recognition, his reward is certain in the Hereafter. Conversely, the Quran tells us that those who are guided by no moral considerations other than expediency or social conformity and crave the freedom to do as they please, no matter how much worldly success and prosperity they attain or how keenly they are able to relish the short span of their earthly life, will be doomed as the losers on Judgement Day. Islam teaches us that in order to devote our exclusive attention to fulfilling our duties to God and to our fellow-beings, we must abandon all vain and useless activities which distract us from this end. These teachings of the Holy Quran, made even more explicit by Hadith, were thoroughly compatible with my temperament. Q: What is your opinion of the Arabs after you became a Muslim? A: As the years passed, the realization gradually dawned upon me that it was not the Arabs who made Islam great but rather Islam had made the Arabs great. Were it not for the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), the Arabs would be an obscure people today. And were it not for the Holy Quran, the Arabic language would be equally insignificant, if not extinct. Q: Did you see any similarities between Judaism and Islam? A: The kinship between Judaism and Islam is even stronger than Islam and Christianity. Both Judaism and Islam share in common the same uncompromising monotheism, the crucial importance of strict obedience to Divine Law as proof of our submission to and love of the Creator, the rejection of the priesthood, celibacy and monasticism and the striking similarity of the Hebrew and Arabic language. In Judaism, religion is so confused with nationalism, one can scarcely distinguish between the two. The name "Judaism" is derived from Judah-a tribe. A Jew is a member of the tribe of Judah. Even the name of this religion connotes no universal spiritual message. A Jew is not a Jew by virtue of his belief in the unity of God, but merely because he happened to be born of Jewish parentage. Should he become an outspoken atheist, he is no less "Jewish" in the eyes of his fellow Jews. Such a thorough corruption with nationalism has spiritually impoverished this religion in all its aspects. God is not the God of all mankind but the God of Israel. The scriptures are not God's revelation to the entire human race but primarily a Jewish history book. David and Solomon (peace be upon them) are not full-fledged prophets of God but merely Jewish kings. With the single exception of Yom Kippur (the Jewish Day of Atonement), the holidays and festivals celebrated by Jews, such as Hanukkah, Purim and Pesach, are of far greater national than religious significance. Q: Have you ever had the opportunity to talk about Islam to the other Jews? A: There is one particular incident which really stands out in my mind when I had the opportunity to discuss Islam with a Jewish gentleman. Dr. Shoreibah, of the Islamic Center in New York, introduced me to a very special guest. After one Jumha Salat, I went into his office to ask him some questions about Islam but before I could even greet him with "Assalamu Alaikum", I was completely astonished and surprised to see seated before him an ultra-orthodox Chassidic Jew, complete with earlocks, broad-brimmed black hat, long black silken caftan and a full flowing beard. Under his arm was a copy of the Yiddish newspaper, "The Daily Forward". He told us that his name was Samuel Kostelwitz and that he worked in New York City as a diamond cutter. Most of his family, he said, lived in the Chassidic community of Williamsburg in Brooklyn, but he also had many relatives and friends in Israel. Born in a small Rumanian town, he had fled from the Nazi terror with his parents to America just prior to the outbreak of the second world-war. I asked him what had brought him to the mosque? He told us that he had been stricken with intolerable grief ever since his mother died 5 years ago. He had tried to find solace and consolation for his grief in the synagogue but could not when he discovered that many of the Jews, even in the ultra-orthodox community of Williamsburg, were shameless hypocrites. His recent trip to Israel had left him more bitterly disillusioned than ever. He was shocked by the irreligiousness he found in Israel and he told us that nearly all the young sabras or native-born Israelis are militant atheists. When he saw large herds of swine on one of the kibbutzim (collective farms) he visited, he could only exclaim in horror: "Pigs in a Jewish state! I never thought that was possible until I came here! Then when I witnessed the brutal treatment meted out to innocent Arabs in Israel, I know then that there is no difference between the Israelis and the Nazis. Never, never in the name of God, could I justify such terrible crimes!" Then he turned to Dr. Shoreibah and told him that he wanted to become a Muslim but before he took the irrevocable steps to formal conversion, he needed to have more knowledge about Islam. He said that he had purchased from Orientalia Bookshop, some books on Arabic grammar and was trying to teach himself Arabic. He apologized to us for his broken English: Yiddish was his native tongue and Hebrew, his second language. Among themselves, his family and friends spoke only Yiddish. Since his reading knowledge of English was extremely poor, he had no access to good Islamic literature. However, with the aid of an English dictionary, he painfully read "Introduction to Islam" by Muhammad Hamidullah of Paris and praised this as the best book he had ever read. In the presence of Dr. Shoreibah, I spent another hour with Mr. Kostelwitz, comparing the Bible stories of the patriarchs and prophets with their counterparts in the Holy Quran. I pointed out the inconsistencies and interpolations of the Bible, illustrating my point with Noah's alleged drunkenness, accusing David of adultery and Solomon of idolatry (Allah Forbid) and how the Holy Quran raises all these patriarchs to the status of genuine prophets of God and absolves them from all these crimes. I also pointed out why it was Ismail and not Isaac who God commanded Abraham to offer as sacrifice. In the Bible, God tells Abraham: "Take thine son, thine only son whom thou lovest and offer him up to Me as burnt offering." Now Ismail was born 13 years before Isaac but the Jewish biblical commentators explain that away be belittling Ismail's mother, Hagar, as only a concubine and not Abraham's real wife so they say Isaac was the only legitimate son. Islamic traditions, however, raise Hagar to the status of a full-fledged wife equal in every respect to Sarah. Mr. Kostelwitz expressed his deepest gratitude to me for spending so much time, explaining those truths to him. To express this gratitude, he insisted on inviting Dr. Shoreibah and me to lunch at the Kosher Jewish delicatessen where he always goes to eat his lunch. Mr. Kostelwitz told us that he wished more than anything else to embrace Islam but he feared he could not withstand the persecution he would have to face from his family and friends. I told him to pray to God for help and strength and he promised that he would. When he left us, I felt privileged to have spoken with such a gentle and kind person. Q: What Impact did Islam have on your life ? A: In Islam, my quest for absolute values was satisfied. In Islam I found all that was true, good and beautiful and that which gives meaning and direction to human life (and death); while in other religions, the Truth is deformed, distorted, restricted and fragmentary. If any one chooses to ask me how I came to know this, I can only reply my personal life experience was sufficient to convince me. My adherence to the Islamic faith is thus a calm, cool but very intense conviction. I have, I believe, always been a Muslim at heart by temperament, even before I knew there was such a thing as Islam. My conversion was mainly a formality, involving no radical change in my heart at all but rather only making official what I had been thinking and yearning for many years. Also read Maryam Jameelah's Open Letter to Her Parents in which she invites her mother and father to embrace the one true religion.
Saturday, December 30, 20065:47PM - TESTIMONIES OF JEWISH CONVERTS TO ISLAM - Abdullah Ibn Sailam was a Jewish rabbi before becoming aTESTIMONIES OF JEWISH CONVERTS TO ISLAM These are True Stories of Jewish People who followed Judaism and became Muslim, despite the Israeli Arab political conflict, more and more Jews are realizing that Judaism and Christianity are light houses leading to Islam, whether you were a Messianic Jew, a Jew for Jesus, or an Orthodox Jew, any Jew can be for Allah. Because Everyone is born a Muslim (in Submission to Allah) Everyday Jews are Returning (Reverting) to their Religion of Birth and the Religion of Abraham, Moses, and all the past Prophets, Islam. Abdullah Ibn Sailam Al-Husayn ibn Sailam was a Jewish rabbi in Yathrib who was widely respected and honored by the people of the city even by those who were not Jewish. He was known for his piety and goodness, his upright conduct and his truthfulness.
'O people! Spread peace...Share food...Pray during the night while people (normally) sleep... and you will enter Paradise in peace...'
Abdullah ibn Sallam was known among the Sahabah as a man from ahl-al-Jannah "- the people of Paradise. This was because of his determination on the advice of the Prophet to hold steadfastly to the "most trustworthy handhold" that is belief in and total submission to God. 5:32PM - Michael Wolfe - How he found his way to Islam![]() “I did not want to ‘trade in’ my culture. I wanted access to new meanings.” - How an American writer born of a Jewish father and a Christian mother found spiritual fulfillment in Islam. After twenty-five years a writer in America, I wanted something to soften my cynicism. I was searching for new terms by which to see. The way one is raised establishes certain needs in this department. From a pluralist background, I naturally placed great stress on the matters of racism and freedom. Then, in my early twenties, I had gone to live in Africa for three years. During this time, which was formative for me, I did rubbed shoulders with blacks of many different tribes, with Arabs, Berbers, and even Europeans, who were Muslims. By and large these people did not share the Western obsession with race as a social category. In our encounters being oddly colored rarely mattered. I was welcomed first and judged on merit later. By contrast, Europeans and Americans, including many who are free of racist notions, automatically class people racially. Muslims classified people by their faith and their actions. I found this transcendent and refreshing. Malcolm X saw his nation’s salvation in it. “America needs to understand Islam,” he wrote, “because this is the one religion that erases from its society the race problem”. I was looking for an escape route, too, from the isolating terms of a materialistic culture. I wanted access to a spiritual dimension, but the conventional paths I had known as a boy were closed. My father had been a Jew; my mother Christian. Because of my mongrel background, I had a foot in two religious camps. Both faiths were undoubtedly profound. Yet the one that emphasizes a chosen people I found insupportable; while the other, based in a mystery, repelled me. A century before, my maternal great-great-grandmother’s name had been set in stained glass at the high street Church of Christ in Hamilton, Ohio. By the time I was twenty, this meant nothing to me. These were the terms my early life provided. The more I thought about it now, the more I returned to my experiences in Muslim Africa. After two return trips to Morocco, in 1981 and 1985, I came to feel that Africa, the continent, had little to do with the balanced life I found there. It was not, that is, a continent I was after, nor an institution, either. I was looking for a framework I could live with, a vocabulary of spiritual concepts applicable to the life I was living now. I did not want to “trade in” my culture. I wanted access to new meanings. After a mid-Atlantic dinner I went to wash up in the bathroom. During my absence a quorum of Hasidim lined up to pray outside the door. By the time I had finished, they were too immersed to notice me. Emerging from the bathroom, I could barely work the handle. Stepping into the aisle was out of the question. I could only stand with my head thrust into the hallway, staring at the congregation’s backs. Holding palm-size prayer books, they cut an impressive figure, tapping the texts on their breastbones as they divined. Little by little the movements grew erratic, like a mild, bobbing form of rock and roll. I watched from the bathroom door until they were finished, then slipped back down the aisle to my seat. We landed together later that night in Brussels. Reboarding, I found a discarded Yiddish newspaper on a food tray. When the plane took off for Morocco, they were gone. I do not mean to imply here that my life during this period conformed to any grand design. In the beginning, around 1981, I was driven by curiosity and an appetite for travel. My favorite place to go, when I had the money, was Morocco. When I could not travel, there were books. This fascination brought me into contact with a handful of writers driven to the exotic, authors capable of sentences like this, by Freya Stark: The perpetual charm of Arabia is that the traveller finds his level there simply as a human being; the people’s directness, deadly to the sentimental or the pedantic, like the less complicated virtues; and the pleasantness of being liked for oneself might, I think, be added to the five reasons for travel given me by Sayyid Abdulla, the watchmaker; “to leave one’s troubles behind one; to earn a living; to acquire learning; to practice good manners; and to meet honorable men”. I could not have drawn up a list of demands, but I had a fair idea of what I was after. The religion I wanted should be to metaphysics as metaphysics is to science. It would not be confined by a narrow rationalism or traffic in mystery to please its priests. There would be no priests, no separation between nature and things sacred. There would be no war with the flesh, if I could help it. Sex would be natural, not the seat of a curse upon the species. Finally, I did want a ritual component, daily routine to sharpen the senses and discipline my mind. Above all, I wanted clarity and freedom. I did not want to trade away reason simply to be saddled with a dogma. The more I learned about Islam, the more it appeared to conform to what I was after. Most of the educated Westerners I knew around this time regarded any strong religious climate with suspicion. They classified religion as political manipulation, or they dismissed it as a medieval concept, projecting upon it notions from their European past. It was not hard to find a source for their opinions. A thousand years of Western history had left us plenty of fine reasons to regret a path that led through so much ignorance and slaughter. From the Children’s Crusade and the Inquisition to the transmogrified faiths of nazism and communism during our century, whole countries have been exhausted by belief. Nietzsche’s fear, that the modern nation-state would become a substitute religion, have proved tragically accurate. Our century, it seemed to me, was ending in an age beyond belief, which believers inhabited as much as agnostics. Regardless of church affiliation, secular humanism is the air westerners breathe, the lens we gaze through. Like any world view, this outlook is pervasive and transparent. It forms the basis of our broad identification with democracy and with the pursuit of freedom in all its countless and beguiling forms. Immersed in our shared preoccupations, one may easily forget that other ways of life exist on the same planet. At the time of my trip, for instance, 650 million Muslims with a majority representation in forty-four countries adhered to the formal teachings of Islam. In addition, about 400 million more were living as minorities in Europe, Asia and the Americas. Assisted by postcolonial economics, Islam has become in a matter of thirty years a major faith in Western Europe. Of the world’s great religions, Islam alone was adding to its fold. My politicized friends were dismayed by my new interest. They all but universally confused Islam with the machinations of half a dozen middle eastern tyrants. The books they read, the new broadcasts they viewed depicted the faith as a set of political functions. Almost nothing was said of its spiritual practice. I liked to quote Mae West to them: “Anytime you take religion for a joke, the laugh’s on you”. Historically a Muslim sees Islam as the final, matured expression of an original religion reaching back to Adam. It is as resolutely monotheistic as Judaism, whose major Prophets Islam reveres as links in a progressive chain, culminating in Jesus and Muhammad. Essentially a message of renewal, Islam has done its part on the world stage to return the forgotten taste of life’s lost sweetness to millions of people. Its book, the Qur’an, caused Goethe to remark, “You see, this teaching never fails; with all our systems, we cannot go, and generally speaking no man can go, further”. Traditional Islam is expressed through the practice of five pillars. Declaring one’s faith, prayer, charity, and fasting are activities pursued repeatedly throughout one’s life. Conditions permitting, each Muslim is additionally charged with undertaking a pilgrimage to Mecca once in a lifetime. The Arabic term for this fifth rite is Hadj. Scholars relate the word to the concept of kasd, “aspiration,” and to the notion of men and women as travelers on earth. In Western religions pilgrimage is a vestigial tradition, a quaint, folkloric concept commonly reduced to metaphor. Among Muslims, on the other hand, the hadj embodies a vital experience for millions of new pilgrims every year. In spite of the modern content of their lives, it remains an act of obedience, a profession of belief, and the visible expression of a spiritual community. For a majority of Muslims the hadj is an ultimate goal, the trip of a lifetime. As a convert I felt obliged to go to Makkah. As an addict to travel I could not imagine a more compelling goal. The annual, month-long fast of Ramadan precedes the hadj by about one hundred days. These two rites form a period of intensified awareness in Muslim society. I wanted to put this period to use. I had read about Islam; I had joined a Mosque near my home in California; I had started a practice. Now I hoped to deepen what I was learning by submerging myself in a religion where Islam infuses every aspect of existence. I planned to begin in Morocco, because I knew that country well and because it followed traditional Islam and was fairly stable. The last place I wanted to start was in a backwater full of uproarious sectarians. I wanted to paddle the mainstream, the broad, calm water. About Michael Wolfe Michael Wolfe is the author of books of poetry, fiction, travel, and history. His most recent works are a pair of books from Grove Press on the pilgrimage to Mecca: “The Hajj” (1993), a first-person travel account, and “One Thousand Roads to Mecca” (1997), an anthology of 10 centuries of travelers writing about the Muslim pilgrimage. In April 1997, he hosted a televised account of the Hajj from Mecca for Ted Koppel’s “Nightline” on ABC. He is currently at work on a four-hour television documentary on the life and times of the Prophet Muhammad. Read Michael Wolfe’s articles on Beliefnet.com Michael Wolfe’s books on Amazon 4:50PM - TO ATTENTION OF ALL THE MEMBERS THE VIDEO MADE BY ABC -The Hajj: One American's Pilgrimage to M
As the season of Hajj (Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca for visiting and praying at the [Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<span [...] ,>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><span class="insertedphoto"><center><span class="insertedphoto"><img class="alignleft" src="http://images.sufi786.multiply.com/image/1/photos/upload/300x300/RZbfAAoKCkcAAB1FZgI1/wolfe.jpg?et=CTtvBNc%2CJKreHp5TewNuHw" border="0"></span><img class="alignmiddle" src="http://images.sufi786.multiply.com/image/1/photos/upload/300x300/RZbcSwoKCkcAAHMCeJw1/ABC%20HAJJ.jpg?et=OhpDt7TdM8iCRCpSnrR%2CkA" border="0"></center><br></span><span class="detailtitle"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">The
Hajj: One American's Pilgrimage to Mecca</span></span></p><br><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><br><span class="detailtitle"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"></span></span><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p> </o:p></span><span style="font-size: 16pt; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);">Dear members of Love Your
Lord group welcome and As-Salaam-Alaikum .</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt;">
As the season of Hajj (Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca for visiting and praying at
the </span><span id="spckbody"><span style="font-size: 16pt;" times="" new="" roman="" ,="" serif="" ;="">Ka'abah </span></span><span style="font-size: 16pt;">house of Allah, one of the Five Pillars of Islam) is underway at Mecca now,
I have the pleasure to announce that the video made by ABC -"The Hajj: One American's Pilgrimage to Mecca"</span><span style="font-size: 16pt;"> will be available for the viewing of
Members in this group video section side by side with </span><span style="font-size: 16pt;">documentary Inside
Mecca made by National Geographic</span><span style="font-size: 16pt;"> in couple of days (if Allah wills).<o:p></o:p></span>
</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt;">Thank You<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt;">Sufi786</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 102, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p> </o:p></span><span style="color: rgb(153, 51, 0);" class="detailtitle"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">The
Hajj: One American's Pilgrimage to Mecca</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal; color: rgb(153, 51, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">Description<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal; color: rgb(153, 51, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal; color: rgb(153, 51, 0);"><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";">For over 1,400 years, Muslims have
been performing the pilgrimage, or Hajj, to the sacred site of Mecca. In modern
times, approximately two million Muslims make the pilgrimage to Mecca each
year, a trip required of all Muslims at least once in lifetime if they are
financially and physically able. During the Hajj, Muslims from all over the
world come together for a few days to participate in common rituals, joined together
by their shared faith in the most holy places of Islam, the city and
surrounding areas of Mecca. As the birthplace of the Prophet Muhammad and the
site where he first received Qur’anic revelation, Mecca is a place of great
spirituality and tradition. <br>
<br>
Since only Muslims may enter Mecca, it is a place that few Americans will get
to see, which makes this piece especially interesting. Following
writer/producer Michael Wolfe, the film documents his second trip or Hajj for
ABC News’ Nightline. One of the more than seven million Muslims in the United
States, Wolfe is a convert to Islam, born to a Christian mother and a Jewish
father. Speaking live from the Ka’ba, the Great Mosque in Mecca, in an
interview with ABC News’ Ted Koppel, Wolfe takes viewers step-by-step through
both the physical and spiritual aspects of the pilgrimage, explaining the
origins and meanings of the various rituals.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p style="color: rgb(153, 51, 0);" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 16pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<!-- multiply:no_crosspost --><p class='multiply:no_crosspost'></p> 4:01PM - If God is All-Good, then Why does Evil Exist?Question: If God is Benevolent and Omnipotent, then why is there existence of evil in the world? If God allows evil to exist, then He is not all-good. If God cannot help but allow evil to exist, then he is not all-powerful. Answer:The word ‘Evil’ is generally used in two separate connotations. Firstly, it is used for reference to the bad deeds of people; for instance lying, injustice, oppression etc. Secondly, it is used for circumstances and conditions, which people consider as ‘not good’; for instance poverty, earthquakes, natural calamities, drought etc. The above question is generally asked from both perspectives, i.e. ‘if God is All-good, then why does He allow people to do evil?’ and ‘if God is All-good, then why is there is so much suffering in this world?’. As far as the first question is concerned, evil deeds are, in fact, a result of the freewill that God has bestowed upon man, for the particular purpose of the test, during the life of this world. This ‘test’ would not have been possible without granting man the freewill to deviate from the right path, if man so desired. Thus, the Qur’an (Al-Maaidah 5: 48) says: And had God so desired, He would have made you a single people [and not given you the freedom to deviate], but for the purpose of testing you in what He has bestowed upon you [He granted you freedom]. At another instance, the Qur’an also tells us that God created man on the path of ‘good’, evil came into existence only because of man’s deviation from that ‘good’. The Quran says:
It is clear from the cited verses that ‘evil deeds’ are only a product of man’s deviation from the right path, which, in turn, is the result of the freewill, which God has bestowed upon man. One may, however, say that when man commits a sin - deviates from the right path - God should restrict his freedom. Even though, it was possible for God to do so, yet doing so would effectively have meant taking away man’s freewill and, thereby, terminating his test. This is precisely what is referred in the above-cited verse in the words: “had it not been for God’s decision, which had preceded [regarding testing man and allowing him time], the matter would have been [immediately] decided between them, regarding what they differed in.” Hence, for the purpose of making the test possible, it was necessary to allow man to deviate from the prescribed path, if he so desired, without following such deviation with any immediate punishment: as an immediate punishment for doing ‘evil’ and an immediate reward for doing ‘good’ would also have rendered the ‘test’ ineffective and impossible. The Qur’an says:
As should be obvious, there is nothing in the concept of ‘test’, which refutes God’s benevolence, mercy or His being all-good. Nevertheless, if all were to end with man’s death, if ‘good’ and ‘evil’ were not to meet their separate ends, if the test, during the life of this world, were abandoned without its logical results - this would then, indeed, refute all benevolence, mercy, justice and goodness of the Creator. It is because of this reason that the Qur’an has emphatically declared that it would not be all over at man’s death and that at the end of the ‘test’, man shall be rewarded or punished for his performance during this ‘test’. Thus, the verse of Al-Maaidah cited above, goes further to say: Therefore, excel in good deeds, to your Lord shall be the return of all of you, then He shall inform you regarding that, in which you differed. Now, let us turn to the second question. The Qur’an tells us that the ‘good’ and the ‘bad’ times are also a part of the ‘test’ of man. It tells us that ‘good’ times are a test of man’s gratitude, while ‘bad’ times are a test of man’s perseverance and steadfastness in God’s ways. The Qur’an says:
The Qur’an also tells us that the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ times for a particular individual or a people is not merely a test for that particular individual or people alone. It is also a test for all others, who directly or indirectly come in contact with those individuals or people. For instance, loss of wealth of an individual is a ‘test’ of perseverance and steadfastness for that particular individual, on the one hand, while on the other, it is a ‘test’ for those living around that individual, insofar as how they behave and help out that particular individual in his hard times. Similarly, a famine, for instance, is not merely a ‘test’ for those directly affected by the calamity; on the contrary, it is also a ‘test’ for those whom God has bestowed with surplus food. If one were to analyze the events taking place around him, one would realize the immaculate setup that the All-Wise has created for comprehensively testing the humankind. This realization would, in turn, significantly affect one’s behavior and response to the ‘good’ and the ‘bad’ that comes one’s ways. After this realization, one would consider the ‘good’ that comes his ways, as much a test, as the ‘bad’ that he is made to face. Ignoring this fact, man is prone to becoming arrogant, whenever good comes his ways and to losing all hope, when faced with a difficulty. This attitude is only the result of ignoring the concept of ‘test’ that is inherent in all events that happen around us or upon us. The Qur’an comments on this attitude of man in the following words:
Thus, as a general principle, an individual, according to the Qur’an, may be faced with extreme ‘hard times’ for any of the following reasons: 1. The person faced with the particular situation is tested with such a situation while others are made to realize the blessings of God and the privileges that they enjoy in life. Such a situation normally is to point out to others the great blessings of God that we tend to take for granted. A normal person suddenly loses his eyesight and is turned into a blind. This extra-ordinary event in the life of one person may point out to others the great blessing of “eyes that see”, which we normally tend to ignore in our lives and may also help us realize the duties that are incumbent upon us for enjoying this extra-ordinary privilege in life. On the other hand, the particular individual faced with such a situation is tested for his steadfastness and perseverance in the God’s ways. Our hardships, normally, fall into this category. The ideal attitude that we all must aspire to develop is that every time a hardship comes our way, we should consider it an opportunity of success in our ultimate life and pray to God to help us succeed in this test. 2. Sometimes God selects a person, on the basis of His absolute knowledge, to behave as an epitome of gratitude toward God for all those around him. In such cases, the primary objective of putting an individual through an extremely severe situation is to teach others of the correct attitude of thankfulness and gratitude toward their Lord. In this situation, others are made to see the individual’s faithful and thankful behavior toward his Creator in a very severe situation and thereby realize the importance of the good things God has given them and also to compare their own behavior with that of the person put in such a severe situation. The basic difference between this situation and the one described in number 1 above is from the particular individual’s perspective that is taken through such extra-ordinary situation. In number 1, it is primarily a test for the individual, while in number 2, it is a privilege for the particular individual that he is selected by God for the purpose of teaching others of the right attitude and to act as an example for them. An example of this may be seen in the life of Hadhrat Ayyub (pbuh) [2]. 3. To cleanse an individual of the bad deeds that he might - knowingly or unknowingly - have committed in the past. If the person remains steadfast and faithful to his Lord in this cleansing process, all his bad deeds are washed away in the life of this world, which guarantees his success in the life hereafter. 4. To punish an individual for his general attitude of transgression against God in life In such a situation the severe condition is only a preamble for the real punishment that the person shall face in the life hereafter. 8:34AM - Guidance is in the hand of AllaahGuidance is in the hand of Allaah Question: How can we reconcile between the aayahs (interpretation of the meanings): “Verily, you (O Muhammad) guide not whom you like” [al-Qasas 28:56] and “And verily, you (O Muhammad) are indeed guiding (mankind) to the Straight Path”[al-Shooraa 42:52]? Answer: Praise be to Allaah. Allaah has created man and given him reason, and He has sent down to him Revelation and sent to him Messengers to call him to the truth and warn him against falsehood. Then He has left him to make his own choice. “And say: ‘The truth is from your Lord.’ Then whosoever wills, let him believe; and whosoever wills, let him disbelieve [al-Kahf 18:29 – interpretation of the meaning] Allaah commanded His Messenger Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) to convey the truth to all of mankind. Then they have the choice to do as they wish. If a person obeys, he benefits himself, and if he disobeys, he harms himself, as Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Say: ‘O you mankind! Now truth (i.e. the Qur’aan and Prophet Muhammad), has come to you from your Lord. So whosoever receives guidance, he does so for the good of his own self; and whosoever goes astray, he does so to his own loss; and I am not (set) over you as a Wakeel (disposer of affairs to oblige you for guidance)’”[Yoonus 10:108] Islam is the religion of the natural state of man (fitrah), the religion of reason and thought. Allaah has distinguished the truth from falsehood. He has enjoined all that is good and forbidden all that is evil. He has permitted good things and forbidden evil things. There is no compulsion in religion because the benefits or harms come back upon the created being, not upon the Creator. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path. Whoever disbelieves in Taaghoot (false gods) and believes in Allaah, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break” [al-Baqarah 2:256] And Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Whosoever does righteous good deed, it is for (the benefit of) his ownself; and whosoever does evil, it is against his ownself. And your Lord is not at all unjust to (His) slaves”[Fussilat 41:46] Guidance is in the hand of Allaah. If Allaah willed, He could guide all of mankind, for there is nothing that He cannot do on this earth or in the heavens. Nothing happens in His Dominion except that which He wills. “Say: ‘With Allaah is the perfect proof and argument, (i.e. the Oneness of Allaah, the sending of His Messengers and His Holy Books, to mankind); had He so willed, He would indeed have guided you all’”[al-An’aam 6:149 – interpretation of the meaning] But in His Wisdom, Allaah has created us with the ability to choose, and He has sent down to us guidance and the Criterion. So whoever obeys Allaah and His Messenger will enter Paradise and whoever disobeys Allaah and His Messenger will enter Hell, as Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Verily, proofs have come to you from your Lord, so whosoever sees, will do so for (the good of) his ownself, and whosoever blinds himself, will do so to his own harm, and I (Muhammad) am not a watcher over you”[al-An’aam 6:104] The Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) has no part in guidance; all that he and the Muslims have to do is to explain and convey the message, and show them guidance but they cannot force people to follow it, as Allaah said to His Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) (interpretation of the meaning): “And had your Lord willed, those on earth would have believed, all of them together. So, will you (O Muhammad) then compel mankind, until they become believers”[Yoonus 10:99] And Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And the duty of the Messenger is only to convey (the Message) plainly”[al-‘Ankaboot 29:18] Guidance to the truth is in the hand of Allaah alone and no human being has any share in that, as Allaah said to His Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) (interpretation of the meaning): “Verily, you (O Muhammad) guide not whom you like, but Allaah guides whom He wills. And He knows best those who are the guided[al-Qasas 28:56] Allaah guides whomsoever He wills and sends astray whomsoever He wills. He has told us that He guides those who obey Him and turn to Him, as He says (interpretation of the meaning): “While as for those who accept guidance, He increases their guidance and bestows on them their piety”[Muhammad 47:17] But whoever disobeys Allaah and turns away from Him, Allaah will not guide him, as He says (interpretation of the meaning): “Truly, Allaah guides not him who is a liar, and a disbeliever” [al-Zumar 39:3] Allaah is Omniscient and knows what has happened and is happening and what is yet to come. Allaah knows the believers and the disbelievers, and what they will do, and He knows what their fate will be in the Hereafter. He has written all that in al-Lawh al-Mahfooz (the Preserved Tablet), as He says (interpretation of the meaning): “And all things We have recorded in a Book”[al-Naba’ 78:29] Allaah has created man with the ability to choose, and He has created him able to do both, either believer or disbelieve, as He says (interpretation of the meaning): “Verily, We showed him the way, whether he be grateful or ungrateful”[al-Insaan 76:3] Man has the choice in terms of his reason only; if he loses his reason by which he is able to distinguish between the alternatives of good and evil, truth and falsehood, then he is not accountable. Hence according to Islamic sharee’ah, the pen is lifted from the insane person (i.e., he is not accountable) until he recovers his senses, and from the child until he reaches the age of understanding, and from the sleeper until he wakes up. None of these people are accountable until they gain or recover the reason by which they may distinguish between the alternatives of faith and disbelief, truth and falsehood, and so on. Whatever direction a person takes, there will be reward and punishment, If he obeys, there will be Paradise: “Indeed he succeeds who purifies his ownself (i.e. obeys and performs all that Allaah ordered, by following the true Faith of Islamic Monotheism and by doing righteous good deeds” [al-Shams 91:9 – interpretation of the meaning] and if he disobeys, there will be Hell: “And indeed he fails who corrupts his ownself (i.e. disobeys what Allaah has ordered by rejecting the true Faith of Islamic Monotheism or by following polytheism, or by doing every kind of evil wicked deeds” [al-Shams 91:10 – interpretation of the meaning] The choice of one of these two ways is something about which a person will be questioned by the Lord of the Worlds. Hence it is clear that faith or disbelief, obedience or disobedience, is the matter of personal choice. Allaah has made reward and punishment dependent upon this choice: “Whosoever does righteous good deed, it is for (the benefit of) his ownself; and whosoever does evil, it is against his ownself. And your Lord is not at all unjust to (His) slaves”[Fussilat 41:46] Whoever loves Allaah and His Messenger and desires good in this world and in the Hereafter, let him enter Islam, and whoever turns away from that and is content with this world and has no interest in the Hereafter and does not submit, then his abode will be Hell. The individual is the one who will benefit or harm himself. There is no compulsion to choose either. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Verily, this (Verses of the Qur’aan) is an admonition, so whosoever wills, let him take a Path to his Lord (Allaah)” [al-Insaan 76:29] From Usool al-Deen al-Islami by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem al-Tuwayjri 8:19AM - The difference between punishments and trialsQuestion: Allah menitions in the Quran that when an evil befalls us it is due to what our own hands have earned. Also our beloved Messenger, Muhammad (sallalahu 'alayhi wassallam) said in a hadith that the most tried are the Prophets, then those in piety after those. So therefore in our day to daylife when things go wrong in our lives how do we decide whether it is due to our sinfulness or that Allah loves us . and therefore sends a trial upon us Jazakallahu khairun Answer: Praise be to Allaah. Punishments are what happen to people in return for their evil deeds. Trials are tests which are sent to try people, and people may be tested by good things or by bad. Concerning punishments, Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Whatever of good reaches you, is from Allaah, but whatever of evil befalls you, is from yourself…” [al-Nisa’ 4:79] Concerning the phrase “is from yourself”, Qutaadah said: “[It means] the punishment is for you, O son of Adam, because of your sin.” Abu Saalih said that “whatever of evil befalls you, is from yourself” means “because of your sin, and I [Allaah] am the One Who decreed it for you.” (Tafseer Ibn Katheer). Allaah also says (interpretation of the meaning): “And whatever of misfortune befalls you, it is because of what your hands have earned. And He pardons much.” [al-Shoora 42:30] Ibn Katheer, may Allaah have mercy on him, said: “[It means] whatever misfortune happens to you, O people, is because of evil deeds that you have already done, and ‘He pardons much’ refers to evil deeds – He does not punish you for them but He pardons them. ‘And if Allaah were to punish men for that which they earned, he would not leave a moving (living) creature on the surface of the earth…’ [Faatir 35:45 – interpretation of the meaning].” Concerning trials, the Prophet The Prophet The following outlines how one may tell whether a given event is a punishment or a trial: If the misfortune results from doing an act of obedience to Allaah, such as being wounded in jihaad, or losing money when migrating for the sake of Allaah, or losing a job because of becoming Muslim or increasing one’s commitment to Islam, then this is a trial. Whoever bears it with patience will be rewarded, but if one reacts angrily then one will earn the wrath of Allaah. If the misfortune results from sin, such as sexually-transmitted diseases or illnesses caused by drinking alcohol and taking drugs, and so on, then this is the kind of punishment that comes in this world (as opposed to being deferred until the Hereafter). If the misfortune is connected neither to a good deed nor a sin – such as other kinds of disease and sickness, losing a child, or failing in business – then it depends on the person’s situation. If he is good and devout, it is a trial, and if he is sinful, it is a punishment. The misfortune may be a punishment to atone for sins, or it may be a
trial aimed at raising a person’s status and increasing his hasanaat (good
deeds/rewards) – this may be determined by whether a person is obedient or
disobedient. A person should not praise himself, rather he should criticize himself for
his shortcomings and strive to attain perfection. He will benefit from misfortunes in any
case, if he has patience and hopes for reward. And Allaah knows best. Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid 6:57AM - The Veil Is Not Oppression, It’s Chic, Say Muslim Women
|
|
Area
of comparison |
Moses |
Muhammad
|
Jesus |
|
Birth |
Usual |
Usual |
Unusual |
|
Family life |
Married, children |
Married, children |
Not married |
|
Death |
Usual |
Usual |
Unusual |
|
Career |
Prophet/Statesman |
Prophet/Statesman |
Prophet |
|
Forced immigration |
To Median |
To Madinah |
None |
|
Encounter with
enemy |
Hot pursuit |
Hot
pursuit/Battles |
No similar
encounter |
|
Results of
encounter |
Moral / physical
victory |
Moral / physical
victory |
Moral victory |
|
Recording
revelation |
In his life
(Torah) |
In his life
(Quran) |
After him |
|
Nature of
teachings |
Spiritual / legal |
Spiritual / legal |
Spiritual |
|
Acceptance by his
people |
Rejected then
accepted |
Rejected then
accepted |
Rejected by most
Israelites |
In
Deuteronomy 18:19: "And it shall come to pass that whosoever will not
hearken my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of
him."
In the Quran 113 of
the 114 chapters starts with "In the name of Allah, most Gracious, most
Merciful." Also, in their daily work, Muslims start with this saying.
Notice "in my name", not in the name of God. God talks about His
Personal Name that is Allah. As it is a Personal Name, it is not subject to
gender, like god or goddess, or to plurality, like god or gods. Christians
start with "In the name of the father, the son, and the holy spirit."
Thus the above verse of Deuteronomy applies only to Muhammad.
The Jews are still
expecting the fulfillment of the prophecy of "unto like Moses." When
Jesus said that he is the Messiah of the Jews, they began to inquire about
Elias and the prophet. The Jews had a parallel prophecy that before the coming
of the Messiah, Elias must come first in his second coming. Jesus confirms this
Jewish belief:
Matthew
17:11-13 "...Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things. But
I say unto you, that Elias is come already, and they knew him not, then the
disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist."
The Jews did not
believe Jesus about Elias, so they sent priests and Levites to John the Baptist
to ask who he really was:
John
1:20-21 "And he (John the Baptist) confessed and denied not; but
confessed, I am not the Christ. And they asked him, what then, Art thou Elias?
And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No."
Jesus said that
Elias came, and it was understood that he was John the Baptist. But John the
Baptist denied that. I will leave this discrepancy between John the Baptist and
Jesus for the Christian scholars to solve!
The Jews were waiting
for the fulfillment of three distinct prophecies:
1.
The coming of Christ.
2.
The coming of Elias.
3.
The coming of that prophet.
And the crucial
question here is "Art thou that prophet?" Who was then the long
awaited prophet after the advent of John the Baptist and Jesus? Was it not the
one like unto Moses, as described above, who was Muhammad?
John is the only
apostle to report the story of the last dialogue between Jesus and the
apostles. It happened after the last supper and before Jesus’ arrest. It ends
with a speech of four chapters long; John 14-17. It is interesting to note that
the synoptic do not refer to this very long speech. Did the text initially
exist in synoptic and then removed? If so, why? This adds to the long list of
mysteries of the Bible. Nevertheless, these chapters present a futuristic
outline with very important subject.
This farewell speech
seemed like Jesus was addressing the entire humanity with his vision and
recommendations. His main concern was to specify who would guide humanity after
him. In John 14:16: "And I will pray the father, and he shall give you
another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever." We do not
know exactly the original Aramaic word that Jesus used for the Comforter. Other
Bibles use Consoler, Advocate, Helper, and in Greek Bibles the word is
Baraclete. There are different explanations for the Comforter: the Holy Ghost,
the Word, a person, etc. In John 14:18, Jesus said: "I will not leave
you comfortless." This means that he referred to himself as Comforter.
However, in John 14:26, the Comforter is referred to as the Holy Ghost! And
Christian preachers assure their audience that the comforter is the Holy Ghost,
without any mention to the following references from John 15:26: "...he
shall testify of me."
John
16:7-8 "...It is expedient for you that I go away, for if I go not
away, the comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him
unto you. And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of
righteousness, and of judgment:"
John
16:13-14 "Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide
you into all truth, for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall
hear, that shall he speak, and he will shew you things to come. He shall
glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you."
Does the above
descriptions fit the Holy Ghost, spirit, or a person? The comforter is
described as to be able to hear and speak; does this fit a spirit or a person?
Did a deliberate adaptation of the Bible add a few words here and there to
alter the intended meanings that predicted the advent of a prophet after Jesus?
Was the Holy Ghost absent when Jesus was on Earth, and it was waiting for him
to depart, so it can guide the believers? Without any prejudice, one can
honestly conclude that Jesus was talking about a prophet that will establish
righteousness and Judgment. This is what Muhammad accomplished: righteousness
and Judgment, faith and law.
Whatever the
explanation is for the Comforter, we conclude that Jesus left unfinished work
and that someone was coming to complete his mission.
If one puts together
all the above-mentioned verses of the Bible about Shiloh (Islam), Baca,
chariots of camels, Prophet like unto Moses, Art thou that Prophet, and
Comforter, one should conclude without any doubt that these verses relates to
Islam and Muhammad. These verses escaped the human’s revision of the Bible. And
we can only hope that these verses will not be expunged from the next revised
version of the Bible!
12:26PM - HOLY QURAN WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION - SURAH 8 AL-ANFAL (SPOILS OF WAR, BOOTY) (الأنفال)

Introduction
Name
The Surah takes its name AL-ANFAL (The Bounties) from the first verse.
The Period of Revelation
It was revealed in 2 A. H. after the Battle of Badr, the first battle
between Islam and kufr. As it contains a detailed and comprehensive
review of the Battle, it appears that most probably it was revealed at
one and the same time. But it is also possible that some of the verses
concerning the problems arising as a result of this Battle might have
been revealed later and incorporated at the proper places to make it a
continuous whole. At any rate, in the whole Surah there is nothing that
might show that it is a collection of a couple of discourses, that
have been patched up together.
Historical Background
Before reviewing the Surah, it is worthwhile to consider the events
that led to the Battle of Badr.
During the first decade or so of the
Prophethood at Makkah, the Message had proved its firmness, and
stability. This was the result of two things. First, the Messenger,
who possessed the highest qualities of character, was performing his
Mission with wisdom, foresight and magnanimity. He had shown by his
conduct that he had made up his mind to carry the movement to a
successful end and, therefore, was ready to face all sorts of dangers
and obstacles in the way. Secondly, the Message was so charming that
it attracted the minds and hearts of the people irresistibly towards
itself. So much so that all obstacles of ignorance, superstition and
petty prejudices failed to check, its advance. That is why the Arab
upholders of the ways of "ignorance,' who looked down upon it in its
initial stages, had' begun to reckon it as a serious menace during the
last period of the stay of the Holy Prophet at Makkah, and were bent
on crushing it with all the force at their command. But in spite of
the above-mentioned strength, the movement still lacked certain things
to lead it to victory:-
First, it had not yet been fully proved that it
had gathered round it a sufficient number of such followers who not
only believed in its truth, but also had such an intense devotion to
its principles that they were ready to expend all their energies and
all that they possessed in the struggle for its success and
establishment. So much so that they were ready to sacrifice their
lives in the fight against the whole world itself even though they
should be their own nearest relative. It is true that the followers of
Islam had endured the severest persecutions at the hands of the
Quraish of Makkah and had given a good proof of the firmness of their
faith and their strong relation with Islam, yet further trials were
required to show that Islam had succeeded in acquiring such a band of
followers which considered nothing dearer than its ideal and was ready
to sacrifice life for it.
Secondly, though the voice of Islam had
reached' every part of the country, its effects were yet scattered and
its acquired strength was spread here and there: it had not yet
gathered sufficient force essential for a decisive conflict with the
old established order of "ignorance".
Thirdly, Islam had yet no home
of its own and had not established itself firmly anywhere in the land
where it could consolidate its power and make it a base for further
action. For the Muslims were scattered all over the country and were
living among the unbelievers as aliens whom their bloodthirsty enemies
wanted to uproot from their own homes.
Fourthly, the Muslims had not
yet had an opportunity to demonstrate practically the blessings of the
system of life based on Islam. There was neither any Islamic culture,
nor any social, economic or political system; nor were there any
established principles of war and peace for their guidance. Therefore
the Muslims had no opportunity for demonstrating those moral
principles on which they intended to build their entire system of
life; nor had it been proved on the touchstone of trial that the
Muslims as a community were sincere in their proclamation of the
Message.
Allah created opportunities for making up these deficiencies.
During the last four years or so of the Prophet's stay at Makkah, the
voice of Islam had been proving effective at Yathrab and the people
for various reasons had been accepting the message more readily than
other clans of Arabia. So much so that in the twelfth year of
Prophethood on the occasion of Haj a deputation of 75 people met the
Holy Prophet in the darkness of night. These people not only accepted
Islam, but also offered to give him and his followers a home. As this
was a most epoch making opportunity provided by Allah, the Holy
Prophet took advantage of it.
The significance of this offer was quite
clear to the people of Yathrab, and they fully realized that this was
not an invitation to a mere fugitive, but to the Messenger of Allah so
that he should become their leader and ruler. Likewise they knew that
they were not inviting the Muslim refugees to give them shelter from
persecution but to assemble them from all over the country for their
integration with themselves to form an organized community. Thus the
offer of the people of Yathrab was to make Yathrab the "City of
Islam." Accordingly the Holy Prophet accepted their invitation and
made it the first "City of Islam" in Arabia.
And the people of Yathrab
were fully aware of the implications of this offer. It was indeed a
declaration of war against the whole of Arabia, and an invitation to
their own social and economic boycott as well. And when the Ansar from
Yathrab declared their allegiance to the Holy Prophet at Aqabah, they
knew fully well its consequences. During the course of the formal
declaration of allegiance, Asad-bin- Zurarah, the youngest of all the
delegates from Yathrab, stood up and said, "0 people of Yathrab! Just
listen to me and consider the matter carefully in all its aspects.
Though we have come to him, regarding him only as a Messenger of Allah,
we should know that we shall be inviting the enmity of the whole of
Arabia. For when we take him away to Yathrab, we shall be attacked and
our children may be put to the sword. Therefore if you have the
courage in your hearts to face it, then and then only, you should
declare your allegiance to him and Allah will give you its reward. But
if you love your lives more than him and his Message, then leave this
matter and frankly excuse yourselves, for at this time Allah may
accept your excuses."
Abbas bin Ubadah bin Naalah, another member of
the delegation, reiterated the same thing, saying,
Do you understand
the implication of the declaration of your allegiance to this person?"
(Voices, "Yes, we know it.") "You are challenging the whole world to
war by your declaration of allegiance to him. There is every
likelihood of a serious menace to your lives and properties. Therefore
consider it well. If you have any idea lurking in your minds that you
will then hand him over to his enemies, it is much better to leave him
alone now, because that conduct shall bring shame and disgrace to you
in this world and the next. On the other hand, if you have sincerely
resolved that you will endure all kinds of consequences that will
follow as a result of this invitation, then it would be the best thing
to take the oath of allegiance to him because, by God, this will
surely bring good to you in this world as well as in the next world."
At this all the members of the delegation cried with one voice, "We
are ready and prepared to risk all our wealth and our noble kith and
kin for his sake."
It was then that the famous oath of allegiance,
which is known as the "Second Oath of Allegiance at Aqabah" was taken.
On the other side, the people of Makkah also understood fully well the
implications of this matter from their own point of view. They
realized that Muhammad (Allah's peace be upon him), who, they knew
well, had a great personality and possessed extraordinary abilities,
was going to gain a strong footing, by this allegiance. For this would
help integrate his followers, whose constancy, determination, and
unwavering fidelity to the Messenger had been tried, into a
disciplined community under his wise leadership and guidance. And they
knew that this would spell death for their old ways of life. They also
realized the strategic importance of. Al- Madinah to their trade,
which was their chief means of livelihood.
Its geographical position
was such that the Muslims could strike with advantage at the caravans
traveling on the trade route between Yaman and Syria, and thus strike
at the root of their economy and that of other pagan clans very
effectively. The value of the trade done by the people of Makkah alone
on this route, not to count that of raif and other places, amounted to
about two hundred thousand dinars annually.
As the Quraish were fully
aware of the implications of the oath of allegiance at Aqabah, they
were greatly perturbed when they got wind of it the same night. At
first they tried to win over the people of Al-Madinah to their side.
But when they saw that the Muslims were migrating to Al- Madinah in
small groups, they realized that the Holy Prophet was also going to
emigrate soon from there. Then they decided to adopt an extreme
measure to prevent this danger.
A few days before his migration, the
Quraish held a council to consider the matter. After a good deal of
argument; they decided that one person should be taken from each of
the families of Quraish other than that of Banu Hashim to put an end
to the life of the Holy Prophet. This was to make it difficult for the
family of the Holy Prophet to fight alone with all the other families
of the Quraish and thus to force them to accept blood-money for his
murder-instead of taking revenge from them, but by the grace of Allah
their plot against the life of the Holy Prophet failed because of his
admirable foresight and full trust in Allah, and he reached Al-
Madinah safe and sound. When they could not prevent his emigration, it
occurred to them to exploit Abdullah bin Ub`ai who had begun to cherish a
grievance against the Holy Prophet since his arrival at Al-Madinah. He
was an influential chief of Al-Madinah and the people had agreed to
make him their king. But when the majority of Aus and Khazraj clan
became Muslims and acknowledged the Holy Prophet as their leader,
guide and ruler, all his hopes of becoming a king came to an end.
Therefore the Quraish wrote to him, "As you have given shelter to our
enemy, we tell you plainly that you should either fight with him
yourself or exile him from your city otherwise we swear by God that we
will invade your city, kill your males and make your females our slave
girls." This letter added fuel to the flames of his jealousy and he
was inclined to do some mischief, but the Holy Prophet took timely
precautions and defeated his evil designs.
The Quraish got another
opportunity to hold out a threat. When Sa'ad bin Mu'az, another chief
of Al-Madinah, went to Makkah to perform `Umrah, Abu Jahl interrupted
him at the very door of the Kabah, saying, "Do you think we will let
you perform `Umrah in peace while you give shelter and help to
renegades from us? Had you not been a guest of Ummayyah bin Khalf, you
would not have gone alive from here." Sa'ad replied, "By Allah, if you
prevent me from this, I will retaliate in a worse manner and block
your route near Al-Madinah." This incident virtually led to a
declaration from the people of Makkah that they would prevent the
Muslims from a pilgrimage to the Kabah, and from the people of Al-
Madinah that as a retaliation they would block their trade route to
Syria against the opponents of Islam. As a matter of fact there was no
other alternative for the Muslims than to keep a strong hold on this
route so as to force the Quraish, and the other clans, whose interests
were vitally bound with this route, to reconsider their inimical and
antagonistic attitude towards them. That is why the Holy Prophet
attached the greatest importance to this problem. As soon as he was
free from making the preliminary arrangements for organizing the newly
formed Muslim Community and settling peace terms with the neighboring
Jewish habitations, he adopted two measures in this connection:-
First,
he entered into negotiations with those clans who lived between the
Red Sea and this route so as to make alliances with them or at east to
persuade them to make treaties of neutrality with the Muslims. He was
successful in this, and he entered into a treaty of non-alignment with
Juhainah, which was a very important clan of the hilly tract near the
sea coast. Then, at the end of the first year of Hijrah, he made a
treaty of defensive alliance with Bani Damrah, who lived near Yanb'u
and Zawal Ushairah. In 2 A. H. Bani Mudlij also joined the alliance,
as they were the neighbors and allies of Bani Damrah. Then ii so
happened that quite a large number of these people were converted to
Islam as a result of the missionary work done by the Muslims.
Secondly,
he successively sent small bands of his men on this route to serve as
a warning to the Quraish, and himself accompanied some of them. In the
first year of Hijrah, four expeditions were sent there, that is, the
expedition under Hamzah, the expedition under Ubaidah bin Harith, the
expedition under Sa'ad bin Abi Waqqas and the Al-Abwa' expedition
under the Holy Prophet himself. In the first month of the second year
two more incursions were made on the same route. These are known as
Buwat Expedition and Zawal Ushairah Expedition. Two things about all
these expeditions are noteworthy. First, no blood was shed and no
caravans were plundered in any of these expeditions. This proves that
the real object of these expeditions was to show to the Quraish which
way the wind was blowing. Secondly, not a single man from the people
of Al-Madinah was sent by the Holy. Prophet on any of these incursions.
All the bands consisted purely of the immigrants from Makkah so that
the conflict should remain between the people of the Quraish
themselves and should not further spread by the involvement of other
clans. On the other side, the Quraish of Makkah tried to involve
others also in the conflict. When they sent bands towards Al-Madinah,
they did not hesitate to plunder the people. For instance, an
expedition under the leadership of Kurz bin Jabir al-Fihrl plundered
the cattle of the people of Al-Madinah from the very vicinity of the
city to show what their real intentions were.
This was the state of
affairs when, in Sha'aban, 2 A. H. (February or March, 623 A. D.) a
big trade caravan of the Quraish, carrying goods worth $50,000 or so,
with only a guard of thirty to forty men, on its way back from Syria
to Makkah, reached the territory from where it could be easily
attacked from Al-Madinah. As the caravan was carrying trade goods
worth thousands of pounds, and was scantily guarded, naturally Abu
Sufyan, who was in charge of it, from his Past experience feared an
attach from the Muslims. Accordingly, as soon as he entered the
dangerous territory, he despatched a camel rider to Makkah with a
frantic appeal for help. When the rider reached Makkah, he, following
an old custom of Arabia, tore open the ears of his camel, cut open his
nose and overturned the saddle. Then rending his shirt from front and
behind, he began to cry aloud at the top of his voice, "O people of
Quraish despatch help to protect your caravan from Syria under the
charge of Abu Sufyan, for Muhammad with his followers is in pursuit of
it; otherwise I don't think you will ever get your goods. Run, run for
help." This caused great excitement and anger in the whole of Makkah
and all the big chiefs of the Quraish got ready for war. An army,
consisting of 600 armored soldiers and cavalry of 100 riders with
great pomp and show marched out for a fight. They intended not only to
rescue the caravan but also to put to an end, once for all, the new
menace from the Muslims who had consolidated themselves at Al-Madinah.
They wanted to crush that rising power and overawe the clans
surrounding the route so as to make it absolutely secure for future
trade.
Now the Holy Prophet, who always kept himself well informed of
the state of affairs, felt that the decisive hour has come and that
was the right time when he must take a bold step; otherwise the
Islamic Movement would become lifeless for ever and no chance would be
left for it to rise again. For if the Quraish invaded Al-Madinah, the
odds would be against the Muslims. The condition of the Muslim
Community was still very shaky because the immigrants (Muhajirin) had
not been able to stabilize their economy during the short period (less
than
two years) of their stay at Al-Madinah; their helpers, (the Ansar) had
not yet been tried; and the neighboring Jewish clans were
antagonistic. Then there was a strong group of hypocrites and
mushriks in Al- Madinah itself; above all, the surrounding clans lived
in awe of the Quraish and had all their religious sympathies with them.
The Holy Prophet, therefore, felt that the consequences of this
possible invasion would not be favorable to the Muslims.
The second
possibility was that they would not invade Al-Madinah but try only to
escort their caravan safely and securely by a mere show of force. In
that case, too, if the Muslim remained inactive, it would affect their
reputation adversely. Obviously, this weak stand in the conflict would
embolden the other Arabs also and make the position of the Muslims
very insecure in the country and the surrounding clans would, at the
instance of the Quraish, start hostilities against them, and the Jews,
the hypocrites and the mushriks of Al- Madinah would openly rise
against them and not only endanger their security of life, property
and honor but make it difficult for them even to live there.
The
Muslims would not be able to inspire the enemy with awe so as to keep
safe from them their life, property and honor. A careful study of the
situation led the Holy Prophet to make up his mind to take a decisive
step and go into the battle with whatever little strength he could
muster, for thus and thus only could he show whether the Muslim
Community had the right to survive or was doomed to perish.
When he
arrived at this momentous decision, he called the Muhajirin and the
Ansar together and placed the whole position before them, without any
reservation. He said, "Allah has promised that you will confront one
of the two, the trade caravan coming from the north or the army of the
Quraish marching from the south. Now tell me which of the two you want
to attack!" A large majority of the people replied that they wanted to
attack the caravan. But the Holy Prophet who had something else before
him, repeated the same question. At this Miqdad bin 'Amr, a Muhajir,
stood up and said, "0 Messenger of Allah! Please march to the side to
which your Lord commands you; we will accompany you wherever you go.
We will not say like the Israelites, 'Go and let you and your Lord
fight we will wait'. In contrast to them we say, 'Let you and your
Lord fight; we will fight by your side to our last breath'." Even then
he did not announce any decision but waited for a reply from the Ansar
who had not yet taken any part in any battle of Islam. As this was the
first opportunity for them to prove that they were ready to fulfill
their promise of fighting for the cause of Islam, he repeated the
question without directly addressing them. At this, Sa'ad bin Mu'az,
an Ansar, stood up and said, "Sir, it appears that you are putting the
question to us." When the Holy Prophet said, "Yes", the Ansar replied,
"We have believed in you and confirmed that what you have brought is
the Truth, and have made a solemn pledge with you that we will listen
to you and obey you. Therefore, 0 Messenger of Allah, do whatever you
intend to do. We swear by Allah Who has sent you with the Truth that
we are ready to accompany you to the sea shore and if you enter it, we
will plunge into it. We assure you that not a single one of us will
remain behind or forsake you, for we will not hesitate at all to go to
fight, even if you should lead us to the battlefield tomorrow. We will
remain steadfast in the battle and sacrifice our lives in the fight.
We do hope that by the grace of Allah our behavior will gladden your
heart. So, trusting in Allah's blessing, take us to the battlefield."
After these speeches it was decided that they should march towards the
army of the Quraish and not towards the trade caravan. But it should
be noted that the decision was of an ordinary nature. For the number
of people, who came forward to go to the battlefield, was only a
little more than three hundred (86 Muhajirs, 62 from Aus and 170 from
Khazraj). Then the little army was ill-armed and hardly equipped for
battle. Only a couple of them had horses to ride and the others had to
take their turn in threes and fours on the back of a camel, out of the
70 they had in all. Above all, they had not got enough weapons for the
battle; only 60 of them had armors. It is, therefore, no wonder that
with the exception of those who were prepared to sacrifice their lives
for the cause of Islam, the majority of those who had joined the
expedition, were so filled with fear that they felt as if they were
knowingly going into the jaws of death. Then there were people who
always looked at things from a selfish point of view. Though they had
embraced Islam, they did not realize that their faith would demand the
sacrifice of their lives and properties from them; they were of the
opinion that it was a mad expedition prompted by irrational enthusiasm
for religion. But the Holy Prophet and the true Believers had realized
the urgency of that critical hour which required the risk of life:
therefore they marched straight to the south-west, wherefrom the army
of the Quraish was coming. This is a clear proof of the fact that from
the very beginning they had gone out to fight with the army and not to
plunder the caravan. For if they had aimed at plundering the caravan
they would have taken the north- westerly direction and not the south-
westerly one.
The two parties met in combat at Badr on the seventeenth
of Ramadan. When the two armies confronted each other and the Holy
Prophet noticed that the Quraish army outnumbered the Muslims by three
to one and was much better equipped, he raised his hands up in
supplication and made this earnest prayer with great humility: "0
Allah! Here are the Quraish proud of their war material: they have
come to prove that Thy Messenger is false. 0 Allah! now send that
success that Thou hast promised to give me. 0 Allah!If this little
army of Thy servants is destroyed, then there will be left none in the
land to worship Thee."
In this combat the emigrants from Makkah were
put to the hardest test for they had to fight against their own near
and dear relatives and put to the sword their fathers, their sons,
their paternal and maternal uncles and their brothers. It is obvious
that only such people could have come out successful in this hardest
of tests as had accepted the Truth sincerely and cut off all relations
with falsehood. And in another way the test to which the Ansar were
put was not less hard. So far they had only alienated the powerful
Quraish and their allies by giving shelter to the Muslims against
their wishes but now, for the first time, they were going to give
fight to them and to sow the seeds of a long and bitter war with them.
This was indeed a very hard test for it meant that a small town with a
population of a few thousand inhabitants was going to wage a war with
the whole of Arabia. It is obvious that only such people could take
this bold step who believed in the Truth of Islam so firmly that they
were ready to sacrifice every personal interest for its sake.
So Allah
accepted the self-sacrifices of the Muhajirin and the Ansar because of
their true faith, and rewarded them with His success. The proud, well-
armed Quraish were routed by these ill-equipped devotees of Islam.
Seventy men of their army were killed and seventy captured as
prisoners and their arms and equipment came into the hands of the
Muslims as spoils of war. All their big chiefs, who were their best
soldiers and who had led the opposition to Islam, were killed in this
Battle. No wonder that this decisive victory made Islam a power to be
reckoned with. A Western research scholar says that before the Battle
of Badr, Islam was merely a religion and a state but after the Battle
it became the state religion, nay, the state itself.
Topics of Discussion
It is this great Battle that has been reviewed in this Surah. But let
it be noted that in some respects this review is quite different from
the reviews that are usually made by the worldly commanders after a
great victory.
Instead of gloating over the victory, the moral
weaknesses that had come to the surface in that expedition have been
pointed out so that the Muslims should try their best to reform
themselves.
It has been impressed upon them that the victory was due
to the success of Allah rather -than to their own valor and bravery so
that the Muslims should learn to rely on Him and obey Allah and His
Messenger alone.
The moral lesson of the conflict between the Truth
and falsehood has been enunciated and the qualities which lead to
success in a conflict have been explained.
Then the Surah addresses the
mushriks, the hypocrites, the Jews and the prisoners of this war in a
very impressive manner that should teach them a good lesson.
It also
gives instructions in regard to the spoils of war. The Muslims have
bean told not to regard these as their right but as a bounty from
Allah. Therefore they should accept with gratitude the share that is
granted to them out of it and willingly accede to the share which
Allah sets apart for His cause and for the help of the needy.
Then it
also gives normal instructions concerning the laws of peace and war
for these were urgently needed to be explained at the stage which the
Islamic Movement had entered. It enjoined that the Muslims should
refrain from ways of "ignorance" in peace and war and thus should
establish their moral superiority in the world. It also meant, to
demonstrate to the world in actual practical life the morality which
it had been preaching to the world from the very beginning of Islam
and had been enjoining that practical life should be based on the same.
It also states some articles of the Islamic Constitution which help
differentiate the status of the Muslims living within the limits of
Dar-ul-Islam (the Abode of Islam) from that of the Muslims living
beyond its limits.
Subject: Problems of Jihad
This
surah enunciates general principles of war (one aspect of Jihad) and
peace while reviewing the Battle of Badr and uses them for the moral
training of the Muslims.
Topics and their Interconnection
This
portion deals with the problems of the "Spoils of War". The Quran says
that these are not the spoils of war but the "Bounties of Allah" and
proves this by showing that the victory at Badr (and in all other
battles, too,) was won by His succour and not by the efforts of the
Muslims. It also declares (in v. 40) that the war aim of the Muslims
should be to eliminate all unfavourable conditions for the
establishment of Islam and not to gain spoils. Moreover, the spoils,
being the bounties of God, belong to Allah and His Messenger and they
alone are entitled to allocate them. Then after conditioning the
Muslims to accept these things, the different shares have been
allocated in v. 41. 1 - 41
The Battle of Badr was ordained
by Allah so that Islam should triumph over "ignorance". The lesson from
this is that the Muslims should trust in God and prepare themselves for
war and should not be beguiled by Satan as the disbelievers were. 42 -
54
Sanctity of treaties has been enjoined and the Muslims
commanded to observe them as long as the other party does not break
them. 55 - 59
The Muslims should always be prepared for war
on every front, but should be ready to make peace if the other party is
inclined towards it. 60 - 66
In these verses, instructions about prisoners of war have been given. 67 - 71
In
order to keep the Muslims joined together against their enemies, they
have been taught to have cordial relations with one another. 72 - 75
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
1. They ask thee concerning (things taken as) spoils of war. Say: "(such) spoils are at the disposal of Allah and the Messenger. So fear Allah, and keep straight the relations between yourselves: Obey Allah and His Messenger, if ye do believe."
2. For, Believers are those who, when Allah is mentioned, feel a tremor in their hearts, and when they hear His signs rehearsed, find their faith strengthened, and put (all) their trust in their Lord;
3. Who establish regular prayers and spend (freely) out of the gifts We have given them for sustenance:
4. Such in truth are the believers: they have grades of dignity with their Lord, and forgiveness, and generous sustenance:
5. Just as thy Lord ordered thee out of thy house in truth, even though a party among the Believers disliked it,
6. Disputing with thee concerning the truth after it was made manifest, as if they were being driven to death and they (actually) saw it.
7. Behold! Allah promised you one of the two (enemy) parties, that it should be yours: Ye wished that the one unarmed should be yours, but Allah willed to justify the Truth according to His words and to cut off the roots of the Unbelievers;-
8. That He might justify Truth and prove Falsehood false, distasteful though it be to those in guilt.
9. Remember ye implored the assistance of your Lord, and He answered you: "I will assist you with a thousand of the angels, ranks on ranks."
10. Allah made it but a message of hope, and an assurance to your hearts: (in any case) there is no help except from Allah. and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise.
11. Remember He covered you with a sort of drowsiness, to give you calm as from Himself, and he caused rain to descend on you from heaven, to clean you therewith, to remove from you the stain of Satan, to strengthen your hearts, and to plant your feet firmly therewith.
12. Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them."
13. This because they contended against Allah and His Messenger. If any contend against Allah and His Messenger, Allah is strict in punishment.
14. Thus (will it be said): "Taste ye then of the (punishment): for those who resist Allah, is the penalty of the Fire."
15. O ye who believe! when ye meet the Unbelievers in hostile array, never turn your backs to them.
16. If any do turn his back to them on such a day - unless it be in a stratagem of war, or to retreat to a troop (of his own)- he draws on himself the wrath of Allah, and his abode is Hell,- an evil refuge (indeed)!
17. It is not ye who slew them; it was Allah. when thou threwest (a handful of dust), it was not thy act, but Allah.s: in order that He might test the Believers by a gracious trial from Himself: for Allah is He Who heareth and knoweth (all things).
18. That, and also because Allah is He Who makes feeble the plans and stratagem of the Unbelievers.
19. (O Unbelievers!) if ye prayed for victory and judgment, now hath the judgment come to you: if ye desist (from wrong), it will be best for you: if ye return (to the attack), so shall We. Not the least good will your forces be to you even if they were multiplied: for verily Allah is with those who believe!
20. O ye who believe! Obey Allah and His Messenger, and turn not away from him when ye hear (him speak).
21. Nor be like those who say, "We hear," but listen not:
22. For the worst of beasts in the sight of Allah are the deaf and the dumb,- those who understand not.
23. If Allah had found in them any good. He would indeed have made them listen: (As it is), if He had made them listen, they would but have turned back and declined (Faith).
24. O ye who believe! give your response to Allah and His Messenger, when He calleth you to that which will give you life; and know that Allah cometh in between a man and his heart, and that it is He to Whom ye shall (all) be gathered.
25. And fear tumult or oppression, which affecteth not in particular (only) those of you who do wrong: and know that Allah is strict in punishment.
26. Call to mind when ye were a small (band), despised through the land, and afraid that men might despoil and kidnap you; But He provided a safe asylum for you, strengthened you with His aid, and gave you Good things for sustenance: that ye might be grateful.
27. O ye that believe! betray not the trust of Allah and the Messenger, nor misappropriate knowingly things entrusted to you.
28. And know ye that your possessions and your progeny are but a trial; and that it is Allah with Whom lies your highest reward.
29. O ye who believe! if ye fear Allah, He will grant you a criterion (to judge between right and wrong), remove from you (all) evil (that may afflict) you, and forgive you: for Allah is the Lord of grace unbounded.
30. Remember how the Unbelievers plotted against thee, to keep thee in bonds, or slay thee, or get thee out (of thy home). They plot and plan, and Allah too plans; but the best of planners is Allah.
31. When Our Signs are rehearsed to them, they say: "We have heard this (before): if we wished, we could say (words) like these: these are nothing but tales of the ancients."
32. Remember how they said: "O Allah if this is indeed the Truth from Thee, rain down on us a shower of stones form the sky, or send us a grievous penalty."
33. But Allah was not going to send them a penalty whilst thou wast amongst them; nor was He going to send it whilst they could ask for pardon.
34. But what plea have they that Allah should not punish them, when they keep out (men) from the sacred Mosque - and they are not its guardians? No men can be its guardians except the righteous; but most of them do not understand.
35. Their prayer at the House (of Allah. is nothing but whistling and clapping of hands: (Its only answer can be), "Taste ye the penalty because ye blasphemed."
36. The Unbelievers spend their wealth to hinder (man) from the path of Allah, and so will they continue to spend; but in the end they will have (only) regrets and sighs; at length they will be overcome: and the Unbelievers will be gathered together to Hell;-
37. In order that Allah may separate the impure from the pure, put the impure, one on another, heap them together, and cast them into Hell. They will be the ones to have lost.
38. Say to the Unbelievers, if (now) they desist (from Unbelief), their past would be forgiven them; but if they persist, the punishment of those before them is already (a matter of warning for them).
39. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily Allah doth see all that they do.
40. If they refuse, be sure that Allah is your Protector - the best to protect and the best to help.
41. And know that out of all the booty that ye may acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to Allah,- and to the Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the wayfarer,- if ye do believe in Allah and in the revelation We sent down to Our servant on the Day of Testing,- the Day of the meeting of the two forces. For Allah hath power over all things.
42. Remember ye were on the hither side of the valley, and they on the farther side, and the caravan on lower ground than ye. Even if ye had made a mutual appointment to meet, ye would certainly have failed in the appointment: But (thus ye met), that Allah might accomplish a matter already enacted; that those who died might die after a clear Sign (had been given), and those who lived might live after a Clear Sign (had been given). And verily Allah is He Who heareth and knoweth (all things).
43. Remember in thy dream Allah showed them to thee as few: if He had shown them to thee as many, ye would surely have been discouraged, and ye would surely have disputed in (your) decision; but Allah saved (you): for He knoweth well the (secrets) of (all) hearts.
44. And remember when ye met, He showed them to you as few in your eyes, and He made you appear as contemptible in their eyes: that Allah might accomplish a matter already enacted. For to Allah do all questions go back (for decision).
45. O ye who believe! When ye meet a force, be firm, and call Allah in remembrance much (and often); that ye may prosper:
46. And obey Allah and His Messenger. and fall into no disputes, lest ye lose heart and your power depart; and be patient and persevering: For Allah is with those who patiently persevere:
47. And be not like those who started from their homes insolently and to be seen of men, and to hinder (men) from the path of Allah. For Allah compasseth round about all that they do.
48. Remember Satan made their (sinful) acts seem alluring to them, and said: "No one among men can overcome you this day, while I am near to you": But when the two forces came in sight of each other, he turned on his heels, and said: "Lo! I am clear of you; lo! I see what ye see not; Lo! I fear Allah. for Allah is strict in punishment."
49. Lo! the hypocrites say, and those in whose hearts is a disease: "These people,- their religion has misled them." But if any trust in Allah, behold! Allah is Exalted in might, Wise.
50. If thou couldst see, when the angels take the souls of the Unbelievers (at death), (How) they smite their faces and their backs, (saying): "Taste the penalty of the blazing Fire-
51. "Because of (the deeds) which your (own) hands sent forth; for Allah is never unjust to His servants:
52. "(Deeds) after the manner of the people of Pharaoh and of those before them: They rejected the Signs of Allah, and Allah punished them for their crimes: for Allah is Strong, and Strict in punishment:
53. "Because Allah will never change the grace which He hath bestowed on a people until they change what is in their (own) souls: and verily Allah is He Who heareth and knoweth (all things)."
54. (Deeds) after the manner of the people of Pharaoh and those before them": They treated as false the Signs of their Lord: so We destroyed them for their crimes, and We drowned the people of Pharaoh: for they were all oppressors and wrong- doers.
55. For the worst of beasts in the sight of Allah are those who reject Him: They will not believe.
56. They are those with whom thou didst make a covenant, but they break their covenant every time, and they have not the fear (of Allah..
57. If ye gain the mastery over them in war, disperse, with them, those who follow them, that they may remember.
58. If thou fearest treachery from any group, throw back (their covenant) to them, (so as to be) on equal terms: for Allah loveth not the treacherous.
59. Let not the unbelievers think that they can get the better (of the godly): they will never frustrate (them).
60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.
61. But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in Allah. for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things).
62. Should they intend to deceive thee,- verily Allah sufficeth thee: He it is That hath strengthened thee with His aid and with (the company of) the Believers;
63. And (moreover) He hath put affection between their hearts: not if thou hadst spent all that is in the earth, couldst thou have produced that affection, but Allah hath done it: for He is Exalted in might, Wise.
64. O Messenger. sufficient unto thee is Allah,- (unto thee) and unto those who follow thee among the Believers.
65. O Messenger. rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding.
66. For the present, Allah hath lightened your (task), for He knoweth that there is a weak spot in you: But (even so), if there are a hundred of you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred, and if a thousand, they will vanquish two thousand, with the leave of Allah. for Allah is with those who patiently persevere.
67. It is not fitting for an apostle that he should have prisoners of war until he hath thoroughly subdued the land. Ye look for the temporal goods of this world; but Allah looketh to the Hereafter: And Allah is Exalted in might, Wise.
68. Had it not been for a previous ordainment from Allah, a severe penalty would have reached you for the (ransom) that ye took.
69. But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good: but fear Allah. for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
70. O Messenger. say to those who are captives in your hands: "If Allah findeth any good in your hearts, He will give you something better than what has been taken from you, and He will forgive you: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful."
71. But if they have treacherous designs against thee, (O Messenger.), they have already been in treason against Allah, and so hath He given (thee) power over them. And Allah so He Who hath (full) knowledge and wisdom.
72. Those who believed, and adopted exile, and fought for the Faith, with their property and their persons, in the cause of Allah, as well as those who gave (them) asylum and aid,- these are (all) friends and protectors, one of another. As to those who believed but came not into exile, ye owe no duty of protection to them until they come into exile; but if they seek your aid in religion, it is your duty to help them, except against a people with whom ye have a treaty of mutual alliance. And (remember) Allah seeth all that ye do.
73. The Unbelievers are protectors, one of another: Unless ye do this, (protect each other), there would be tumult and oppression on earth, and great mischief.
74. Those who believe, and adopt exile, and fight for the Faith, in the cause of Allah as well as those who give (them) asylum and aid,- these are (all) in very truth the Believers: for them is the forgiveness of sins and a provision most generous.
75. And those who accept Faith subsequently, and adopt exile, and fight for the Faith in your company,- they are of you. But kindred by blood have prior rights against each other in the Book of Allah. Verily Allah is well-acquainted with all things.
Benefits of the recitation of Surah
al-Anfaal (The Spoils of War)
This surah was revealed in Madinah and it has 75 verses. In
the commentary of Majma’ul Bayaan, it is narrated from Imam Ja’far
as-Sadiq (a.s.) that whoever recites surah al-Anfaal and surah at-Tawba every
month, he will be protected from being a hypocrite and will be counted among
the followers of Ameerul Mu’mineen – Imam Ali (a.s.), and on the day of Qiyamah
he will eat from the table-spread of Jannah together with all the
followers of Ahlul Bayt.
This surah contains the verse about khums, which is
the right of the Ahlul Bayt. The Holy Prophet (s.a.w) said that he
will, on the Day of Judgement, intercede
for the person who recites this surah and will bear witness that the reciter of
this surah was free from hypocrisy. Keeping surah al-Anfaal in your possession
at all times ensures that you get your rights that have been taken from you and
your legitimate desires are fulfilled.
Navigate: (Previous 20 entries)








(peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) said: “If Allaah loves a people, He tries them, and whoever has patience
will have patience, and whoever is anxious will be anxious.” (Reported by
Imaam Ahmad; Saheeh al-Jaami’, 1706).
http://lexicorient.com/e.o/ill/niqab01.j
A
month after ex-foreign secretary Jack Straw suggested that Muslim women
who wear veils over their face can make community relations harder,
what do people within the Muslim community in the UK think of his
remarks? Jack Straw’s comments on veils have been good news for the
owner of The Hijab Centre in the MP’s constituency of Blackburn.